Identifying the fuels and energy conversion technologies necessary to meet European passenger car emissions legislation to 2020

Fuel

Volumn 99, Issue , 2012, Pages 88-105

  Bishop, Justin D K ^a   Axon, Colin J ^b   Tran, Martino ^a   Bonilla, David ^c   Banister, David ^c   McCulloch, Malcolm D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive kernel density estimator; Emissions policies; Tank to wheel; Well to tank; Well to wheel

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE KERNELS; BEST ESTIMATES; CAR EMISSIONS; EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT; EMISSIONS LEGISLATION; ENERGY CONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES; GHG EMISSION; GOODS VEHICLES; PER UNIT; TANK-TO-WHEEL; TRANSPORT FUEL; WELL-TO-TANK; WELL-TO-WHEEL;

AUTOMOBILES; BIOETHANOL; ENERGY CONVERSION; ESTIMATION; ETHANOL; FUELS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; TANKS (CONTAINERS); VEHICLES; WHEELS;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

EID: 84862219302     PISSN: 00162361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.045     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. 2 emissions from light-duty vehicles. Regulation 443/2009, European Parliament and the Council; 2009.
2. 2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles, No. 2007/2119(INI). European Parliament Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety; 2007.
3. Edwards R, Larivé J-F, Mahieu V, Rouveirolles P. Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powetrains in the European Context, No. 2c. European Commission Joint Research Centre; 2007. < http://ies.jrc.ec. europa.eu/uploads/media/WTW-Report-010307.pdf >.
4. ANL. Well-to-wheels analysis of advanced fuel/vehicle systems - a North American study of energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and criteria pollutant emissions. Argonne National Laboratory; 2005. < http://www.transportation. anl.gov/pdfs/TA/339.pdf >.
5. LBST. GM well-to-wheel analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems - a European study. L-B-Systemtechnik GmbH; 2002. < http://www.lbst.de/ressources/docs2002/TheReport-Euro-WTW- 27092002.pdf >.
6. Weiss MA, Heywood JB, Drake EM, Schafer A, AuYeung FF. On the road in 2020: a life-cycle analysis of new automobile technologies. Tech Rep MIT EL 00-003. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2000. < http://lfee.mit.edu/ public/el00-003.pdf >.
7. ANL. Greenhouse gases. Regulated emissions and energy use in transportation (GREET); 2007. < www.transportation.anl.gov/modeling- simulation/GREET/index.html >.
8. J.D.K. Bishop, C.J. Axon, D. Bonilla, D. Banister, M. Tran, and M.D. McCulloch Using non-parametric statistics to identify the best pathway for supplying hydrogen as a road transport fuel Int J Hydrogen Energy 36 2011 9382 9395
9. SMMT. Motor industry facts 2011. The London: Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders; 2011.
10. ACEA. The automobile industry pocket guide. Brussels: European Automobile Manufacturers Association; 2010. < http://www.acea.be/images/uploads/files/ 2010924-Pocket-Guide-2nd-edition.pdf >.
11. Moshtagh N. Minimum volume enclosing ellipsoids; 2009. < www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/9542 >.
12. Beer T, Grant T, Morgan G, Lapszewicz J, Anyon P, Edwards J, et al. Comparison of transport fuels: final report to the australian greenhouse office on the stage 2 study of life-cycle emissions analysis of alternative fuels for heavy vehicles, No. EV45A/2/F3C. CSIRO; 2006.
13. GHGenius. GHGenius 3.18: a model for lifecycle assessment of transportation fuels; 2010. < www.ghgenius.ca >.
14. M. Granovskii, I. Dincer, and M.A. Rosen Life cycle assessment of hydrogen fuel cell and gasoline vehicles Int J Hydrogen Energy 31 3 2006 337 352 (Pubitemid 43112177)
15. IEA. Automotive fuels for the future: the search for alternatives. International Energy agency; 1999.
16. EC. ELCD core database version II. European Commission; 2010. < http://lca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/lcainfohub/datasetArea.vm >.
17. X. Yan, and R.J. Crookes Life cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for road transportation fuels in China Renew Sust Energy Rev 13 9 2009 2505 2514
18. H.L. MacLean, and L.B. Lave Life cycle assessment of automobile/fuel options Environ Sci Technol 37 23 2003 5445 5452 (Pubitemid 37499575)
19. GEMIS, Global Emission Model for Integrated Systems (GEMIS 4.5) for embodied greenhouse gas emissions in energy conversion systems and biofuels. < http://www.oeko.de/service/gemis/en/ >.
20. C.M. Silva, G.A. Gonçalves, T.L. Farias, and J.M.C. Mendes-Lopes A tank-to-wheel analysis tool for energy and emissions studies in road vehicles Sci Total Environ 367 1 2006 441 447 (Pubitemid 44067186)
21. Punter G, Rickeard D, Larivé J-F, Edwards R, Mortimer N, Horne R, et al. Well-to-wheel evaluation for production of ethanol from wheat, No. FWG-P-04-024. Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership; 2004.
22. O.P.R. van Vliet, A.P.C. Faaij, and W.C. Turkenburg Fischer-Tropsch diesel production in a well-to-wheel perspective: a carbon energy, flow and cost analysis Energy Convers Manage 50 4 2009 855 876
23. J. Dufour, D.P. Serrano, J.L. Gálvez, J. Moreno, and C. García Life cycle assessment of processes for hydrogen production. Environmental feasibility and reduction of greenhouse gases emissions Int J Hydrogen Energy 34 3 2009 1370 1376
24. Fulton L. The IEA/SMP transportation model. International Energy Agency/World Business Council for Sustainable Development; 2004. < http://www.wbcsd.org/web/publications/mobility/smp-model-spreadsheet.xls >.
25. IEA. Energy technology perspectives 2008 - scenarios & strategies to 2050. International Energy Agency; 2008.
26. Edwards R, Larivé J-F, Mahieu V, Rouveirolles P. Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powetrains in the European context: well-to-tank Report Appendix 2, No. 2c. European Commission Joint Research Centre; 2007. < http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/media/WTW-Report-010307. pdf >.
27. Spath PL, Mann MK. Life cycle assessment of renewable hydrogen production via wind/electrolysis, No. NREL/MP-560-35404. National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2004. < www.nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/35404.pdf >.
28. Simpson AG. Full-cycle assessment of alternative fuels for light-duty road vehicles in Australia. In: Proceedings of the 2004 world energy congress. Sydney; 2004.
29. Karlström M. Environmental technology assessment of introducing fuel cell city buses - a case study of fuel cell buses in Götenburg, No. 2002:10. Chalmers University of Technology; 2002. < www.cpm.chalmers.se/ CPMDatabase/DataReferences/ESA-2002-10.pdf >.
30. BP. BP statisical review of world energy. BP; 2010. < www.bp.com/statisticalreview >.
31. 2 emissions from fossil-fuel burning, cement manufacture, and gas flaring: 1751-2007. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2010. < http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/ndp030/global.1751-2007.ems >.
32. FAO. FAOSTAT: FAO Statistical Database, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2010. < faostat.fao.org >.
33. Bauen A, Berndes G, Junginger M, Londo M, Vuille F, et al. Bioenergy - a sustainable and reliable energy source: a review of status and prospects (Main Report). International Energy Agency; 2009. < http://www.ieabioenergy.com/ LibItem.aspx?id=6479 >.
34. IEA. World energy outlook 2008. International Energy Agency; 2008.