The bridg model as the most authoritative resource in shared Semantics for ontologies development in healthcare practice

KMIS 2011 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 379-383

  Mendes, David ^a   Rodrigues, Irene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Automatic knowledge discovery; Healthcare; Ontologies; Semantic Web

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERIES; CURRENT TRENDS; FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS; HEALTHCARE DOMAINS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; ONTOLOGY MAPPING; ONTOLOGY POPULATION; SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY; SUBDOMAIN;

AUTOMATA THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INTEROPERABILITY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC WEB;

HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84862214426     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. S. M. Meystre, G. K. Savova, K. C. Kipper-Schuler, J. F. Hurdle, 2008. Extracting Information from Textual Documents in the Electronic Health Record: A Review of Recent Research.
2. Smith B., Brochhausen M., 2008. Establishing and Harmonizing Ontologies in an Interdisciplinary Health Care and Clinical Research Environment.
3. Obo-Owl RESTful Conversion API, 2011. http://www.berkeleybop.org/obo- conv.cgi.
4. Illhoi Yoo, Patricia Alafaireet, Miroslav Marinov, Keila Pena-Hernandez, Rajitha Gopidi, Jia-Fu Chang, Lei HuaData, 2010. Mining in Healthcare and Biomedicine: A Survey of the Literature. Journal of Medical Systems.
5. Irena Spasic, Sophia Ananiadou, John McNaught and Anand Kumar, 2005. Text mining and ontologies in Biomedicine: Making sense of raw text. Brief Bioinform 6 (3): 239-251.
6. Demner-Fushman, Dina Mork, James G Shooshan, Sonya E Aronson, Alan R., 2010. UMLS content views appropriate for NLP processing of the biomedical literature vs. clinical text. Journal of biomedical informatics, vol 43:587-594. Elsevier Inc. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.02.005.
7. BRIDG, 2011. The Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group, http://www.bridgmodel.org.
8. Smith, B., & Ceusters, W., 2006. HL7 RIM: An Incoherent Standard. Medical Informatics, (August), 133-138.
9. Kifer, M., Lausen, G., & Wu, J., 1995. Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages. Journal of the ACM, 42(4), 741-843.
10. Liu, K., Hogan, W. R., & Crowley, R. S., 2011. Natural Language Processing methods and systems for biomedical ontology learning. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44(1), 163-179. Elsevier Inc. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010. 07.006.
11. Cimino, J. J., 2011: High-quality, Standard, Controlled Healthcare Terminologies Come of Age. Methods of information in medicine, 50(2), 101-4: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21416108.
12. Navigli R, Velardi P., 2005. Structural semantic interconnections: a knowledge-based approach to word sense disambiguation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intel (PAMI) 2005; 27:1075-86.
13. Poesio M, Vieira R, Teufel S, 1997. Resolving bridging in unrestricted text, Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Operational Factors in Robust Anaphora Resolution, 1997, p. 1-6.
14. Soon W. M., Ng H. T., Lim D. C. Y., 2001. A machine learning approach to co-reference resolution of noun phrases. Comput Linguist 2001; 27:521-44.
15. Ng V, Cardie C., 2001. Improving machine learning approaches to co-reference resolution. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the ACL. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: ACL.
16. Friedman C, Borlawsky T, Shagina L, Xing HR, Lussier YA., 2006. Bio-ontology and text: bridging the modeling gap. Bioinformatics; 22:2421-9.
17. Cornet R., De Keizer N. F., Abu-Hanna A., 2006. A framework for characterizing terminological systems. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45:253-66.
18. Guarino, Nicola, Chris Welty, 2000. Identity, Unity, and Individuality: Towards a formal toolkit for ontological analysis. In, Horn, W. ed., Proceedings of ECAI-2000: 219-223. Berlin: IOS Press.