Attitudes, threshold levels and cumulative effects of the daily wind-turbine encounters

Applied Energy

Volumn 98, Issue , 2012, Pages 40-46

  Ladenburg, Jacob ^a   Dahlgaard, Jens Olav ^a  

^a DANISH INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENTAL RESEARCH   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Attitude; Cumulative effects; On land wind turbines

Indexed keywords

ENERGY RESOURCES; TECHNOLOGY;

ATTITUDE; CUMULATIVE EFFECTS; RESIDENTIAL AREAS; THRESHOLD LEVELS;

WIND TURBINES;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; THRESHOLD; WIND TURBINE;

EID: 84862212892     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.070     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Commission E. An energy policy for Europe. Brussels: COM; 2007.
2. Zhou Y., Wang L., McCalley J.D. Designing effective and efficient incentive policies for renewable energy in generation expansion planning. Appl Energy 2011, 88:2201-2209.
3. Hofman K., Li X. Canada's energy perspectives and policies for sustainable development. Appl Energy 2009, 86:407-415.
4. Purvins A., Zubaryeva A., Llorente M., Tzimas E., Mercier A. Challenges and options for a large wind power uptake by the European electricity system. Appl Energy 2011, 88:1461-1469.
5. Luickx P.J., Delarue E.D., D'Haeseleer W.D. Considerations on the backup of wind power: operational backup. Appl Energy 2008, 85:787-799.
6. Ekren O, Ekren BY, Ozerdem B. Break-even analysis and size optimization of a PV/wind hybrid energy conversion system with battery storage - a case study. Appl Energy 86:1043-54.
7. Ibrahim H., Younès R., Ilinca A., Dimitrova M., Perron J. Study and design of a hybrid wind-diesel-compressed air energy storage system for remote areas. Appl Energy 2010, 87:1749-1762.
8. Roy A., Kedare S.B., Bandyopadhyay S. Application of design space methodology for optimum sizing of wind-battery systems. Appl Energy 2009, 86:2690-2703.
9. Kalantar M., Mousavi G S.M. Dynamic behavior of a stand-alone hybrid power generation system of wind turbine, microturbine, solar array and battery storage. Appl Energy 2010, 87:3051-3064.
10. Wolsink M. Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of [']backyard motives'. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2007, 11:1188-1207.
11. Tsoutsos T., Tsouchlaraki A., Tsiropoulos M., Serpetsidakis M. Visual impact evaluation of a wind park in a Greek island. Appl Energy 2009, 86:546-553.
12. Möller B. Changing wind-power landscapes: regional assessment of visual impact on land use and population in Northern Jutland, Denmark. Appl Energy 2006, 83:477-494.
13. Ladenburg J. Visual impact assessment of offshore wind farms and prior experience. Appl Energy 2009, 86:380-387.
14. Thayer R.L., Freeman C.M. Altamont: public perceptions of a wind energy landscape. Landsc Urban Plann 1987, 14:379-398.
15. Lee T.R., Wren B.A., Hickman M.E. Public response to the siting and operation of wind turbines. Wind Eng 1989, 13:188-195.
16. Ek K. Public and private attitudes towards "green" electricity: the case of Swedish wind power. Energy Pol 2005, 33:1677-1689.
17. Krohn S., Damborg S. On public attitudes towards wind power. Renew Energy 1999, 16:954-960.
18. Ladenburg J. Attitudes towards on-land and offshore wind power development in Denmark; choice of development strategy. Renew Energy 2008, 33:111-118.
19. Kaldellis J.K. Social attitude towards wind energy applications in Greece. Energy Pol 2005, 33:595-602.
20. Ladenburg J. Attitudes towards offshore wind farms - the role of beach visits on attitude and demographic and attitude relations. Energy Pol 2010, 38:1297-1304.
21. Gee K. Offshore wind power development as affected by seascape values on the German North Sea coast. Land Use Pol 2010, 27:185-194.
22. Kempton W., Firestone J., Lilley J., Rouleau T., Whitaker P. The offshore wind power debate: views from Cape Cod. Coast Manage 2005, 33:119-149.
23. Firestone J., Kempton W. Public opinion about large offshore wind power: underlying factors. Energy Pol 2007, 35:1584-1598.
24. Wolsink M. Entanglement of interests and motives: assumptions behind the NIMBY-theory on facility siting. Urban Stud. 1994, 31:851-866.
25. Jones C.R., Eiser J.R. Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study. Energy Pol 2009, 37:4604-4614.
26. Coleby A.M., Miller D.R., Aspinall P.A. Public attitudes and participation in wind turbine development. J Environ Assess Pol Manage 2009, 11:69-95.
27. Borch K. Stormen om vindmøllerne ved Østerild: analyse af en konfllikt med mange parter. Master thesis; 2011 [in Danish: executive summary in English].
28. Lilley M.B., Firestone J., Kempton W. The effect of wind power installations on coastal tourism. Energies 2010, 3:1-22.
29. Dalton G.J., Lockington D.A., Baldock T.E. A survey of tourist attitudes to renewable energy supply in Australian hotel accommodation. Renew Energy 2008, 33:2174-2185.
30. Frantál B., Kunc J. Wind turbines in tourism landscapes: Czech experience. Ann Tour Res 2011, 38:499-519.
31. Riddington G., McArthur D., Harrison T., Gibson H. Assessing the economic impact of wind farms on tourism in Scotland: GIS, surveys and policy outcomes. Int J Tour Res 2010, 12:237-252.
32. Warren C., Lumsden C., O'Dowd S., Birnie R. Green on Green': public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. J Environ Plan Manage 2005, 48:853-875.
33. Swofford J., Slattery M. Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making. Energy Pol 2010, 38:2508-2519.
34. Ladenburg J, Krause G. Local attitudes towards wind power: the effect of prior experience. In: Krause G, editor. From turbine to wind farms: technical requirements and spin-off products. Intech; 2011. p. 3-14.
35. Ladenburg J, Möller B. Attitudes and acceptance of offshore wind farms: the influence of travel time and wind farm attributes. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011;15:4223-35.
36. Andersen KH, Thomsen M, Kruse J. Rapport om hvordan en dansk kommune blev selvforsynende med ren vindenergi og skabte ny indkomst til kommunens borgere. Nordvestjysk Folkecenter for Vedvarende Energi; 1997 [in Danish].
37. AMR-Interactive. Community attitudes to wind farms in NSW. Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water, New South Wales, Australia; 2010. [accessed 15.03.11]. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/climatechange/10947WindFarms_Final.pdf.
38. Johansson M., Laike T. Intention to respond to local wind turbines: the role of attitudes and visual perception. Wind Energy 2007, 10:435-451.
39. Meyerhoff J., Ohl C., Hartje V. Landscape externalities from onshore wind power. Energy Pol 2010, 38:82-92.
40. Jones C.R., Orr B.J., Eiser J.R. When is enough, enough? Identifying predictors of capacity estimates for onshore wind-power development in a region of the UK. Energy Pol 2011, 39:4563-4577.
41. Danish Energy Authority. The master data register for wind turbines; 2011 [in Danish: Stamdataregister for vindmøller].
42. Pasqualetti M. Wind energy landscapes: society and technology in California desert. Soc Nat Resour 2007, 14:689-699.
43. Train K. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
44. Maddala GS. Limited-depend and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press; 1983.
45. Short L. Wind power and English landscape identity. In: Pascualetti M, Gipe P, Richter R, editors. Wind power in a view-energy landscapes in a crowded world. London: Academic Press; 2002. p. 43-58.
46. Dimitropoulos A., Kontoleon A. Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of wind-farm investment: a choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands. Energy Pol 2009, 37:1842-1854.
47. Ek C. Quantifying the environmental impacts of renewable energy. In: Pearce DW, editor. Environmental valuation in developed countries: case studies. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2006. p. 181-200.
48. McCartney A. The social value of seascapes in the Jurien Bay Marine Park: an assessment of positive and negative preferences for change. J Agric Econ 2006, 57:577-594.
49. Aravena C, Martinsson P, Scarpa R. The effect of a monetary attribute on the marginal rate of substitution in a choice experiment. In: Environmental and resource economics 3rd world congress, Kyoto, Japan; July 3-7, 2006.