Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction after partial PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial UTN U1111-1117-9588

Trials

Volumn 13, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Wellner, Ulrich F ^a   Brett, Sabine ^a   Bruckner, Thomas ^a   Limprecht, Ronald ^a   Rossion, Inga ^a   Seiler, Christoph ^a   Sick, Olivia ^a   Wegener, Inga ^a   Hopt, Ulrich T ^a   Keck, Tobias ^a   Neumann, ^b   Junge, ^b   Neuhaus, ^c   Bahra, ^c   Uhl, ^d   Chromik, ^d   Kalff, ^e   Standop, ^e   Schafer ^e   Padberg, ^f   Menzler, ^f   Izbicki, ^g   Yekebas, ^g   Buchler ^h   Werner, ^h   Knebel, ^h   Post, ⁱ   Niedergethmann, ⁱ   Bartsch, ^j   Fendrich, ^j   Jauch, ^k   Bruns, ^k   Friess, ^l   Kleeff, ^l   Mihaljevic, ^l   Piso, ^m   Max Mayr, ^m   Schlitt, ⁿ   Farkas, ⁿ   more..

^a Department of General and Visceral Surgery ^*  (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^c CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^d ST JOSEF HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BONN   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GIESSEN   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^j UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MARBURG   (Germany)

^k LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^l TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^m KRANKENHAUS BARMHERZIGE BRÜDER REGENSBURG   (Germany)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

Pancreatic fistula; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Pancreatogastrostomy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; GASTROSTOMY; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MORBIDITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREAS SURGERY; PANCREATICOGASTROSTOMY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PANCREATIC FISTULA; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAMPLE SIZE;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; GASTROSTOMY; GERMANY; HUMANS; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESEARCH DESIGN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84862198796     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-45     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 2006, 244(1):10-15. 10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea, 1570590, 16794383.
2. Makowiec F, Post S, Saeger HD, Senninger N, Becker H, Betzler M, Buhr HJ, Hopt UT. Current practice patterns in pancreatic surgery: results of a multi-institutional analysis of seven large surgical departments in Germany with 1454 pancreatic head resections, 1999 to 2004 (German Advanced Surgical Treatment study group). J Gastrointest Surg 2005, 9(8):1080-1087. 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.07.020, 16269378.
3. Kausch The carcinoma of the Papilla Vateri and its radical resection. Beitr Z Clin Chir 1912, 78:439-486. in German, Kausch.
4. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005, 138(1):8-13. 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001, 16003309.
5. Pratt WB, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, Huang ZS, Callery MP, Vollmer CM. Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme. Ann Surg 2007, 245(3):443-451. 10.1097/01.sla.0000251708.70219.d2, 1877022, 17435552.
6. Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM. Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg 2008, 32(3):419-428. 10.1007/s00268-007-9388-5, 18175170.
7. Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H, Sick O, Makowiec F, Hoppner J, Hopt UT, Keck T. A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively. HPB (Oxford) 2010, 12(10):696-702.
8. Shrikhande SV, Qureshi SS, Rajneesh N, Shukla PJ. Pancreatic anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy: do we need further studies?. World J Surg 2005, 29(12):1642-1649. 10.1007/s00268-005-0137-3, 16311866.
9. Shukla PJ, Barreto SG, Fingerhut A, Bassi C, Buchler MW, Dervenis C, Gouma D, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos J, Padbury R, Sarr MG, Traverso W, Yeo CJ, Wente MN. Toward improving uniformity and standardization in the reporting of pancreatic anastomoses: a new classification system by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2010, 147(1):144-153. 10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.003, 19879614.
10. Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Muller MW, Diener MK, Seiler CM, Friess H, Buchler MW. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2007, 193(2):171-183. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.010, 17236843.
11. Wellner U, Makowiec F, Fischer E, Hopt UT, Keck T. Reduced postoperative pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2009, 13(4):745-751. 10.1007/s11605-008-0763-9, 19083070.
12. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1995, 222(4):580-592. 1234894, 7574936.
13. Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S, Fourtanier G, Muscari F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Millat B, Radovanowic A, Fagniez PL. A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 2005, 189(6):720-729. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.015, 15910726.
14. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Salvia R, Butturini G, Sartori N, Mantovani W, Pederzoli P. Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 2005, 242(6):767-773. 10.1097/01.sla.0000189124.47589.6d, 1409871, 16327486.
15. Fernandez-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L, Lopez-Boado MA, Astudillo E. Pancreatogastrostomy with gastric partition after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreatojejunostomy: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg 2008, 248(6):930-938. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818fefc7, 19092337.
16. Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, Tomazic A, Bruns CJ, Busch OR, Farkas S, Belyaev O, Neoptolemos JP, Halloran C, Keck T, Niedergethmann M, Gellert K, Witzigmann H, Kollmar O, Langer P, Steger U, Neudecker J, Berrevoet F, Ganzera S, Heiss MM, Luntz SP, Bruckner T, Kieser M, Buchler MW. Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 2011, 377(9776):1514-1522. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60237-7, 21529927.
17. Hashimoto Y, Traverso LW. Incidence of pancreatic anastomotic failure and delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy in 507 consecutive patients: use of a web-based calculator to improve homogeneity of definition. Surgery 2010, 147(4):503-515. 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.034, 20018335.
18. Koti RS, Gurusamy KS, Fusai G, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery: a Cochrane review. HPB (Oxford) 2010, 12(3):155-165.
19. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2007, 142(5):761-768. 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005, 17981197.
20. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)-An International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007, 142(1):20-25. 10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001, 17629996.
21. Young T, De Haes H, Curran D, Fayers P, Brandberg Y, Vanvoorden V, Bottomley A. EORTC Guidelines for Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trials 2002, EORTC Quality of Life Group Publication, Brussels.
22. Wellner U, Adam U, Makowiec F, Hopt UT, Keck T. [Unicentric prospective randomized trial for comparison of pancreatigastrostomy (PG) and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) - interim analysis -]. Annual Meeting of the German Society for Surgery 2009, (in German) [http://www.egms.de].
23. Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Stat Med 2002, 21(19):2917-2930. 10.1002/sim.1296, 12325108.
24. Bauer P, Kohne K. Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses. Biometrics 1994, 50(4):1029-1041. 10.2307/2533441, 7786985.
25. Higgins JP, White IR, Wood AM. Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials. Clin Trials 2008, 5(3):225-239. 10.1177/1740774508091600, 2602608, 18559412.
26. Newell DJ. Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research. Int J Epidemiol 1992, 21(5):837-841. 10.1093/ije/21.5.837, 1468842.
27. Montedori A, Bonacini MI, Casazza G, Luchetta ML, Duca P, Cozzolino F, Abraha I. Modified versus standard intention-to-treat reporting: are there differences in methodological quality, sponsorship, and findings in randomized trials? A cross-sectional study. Trials 2011, 12:58. 10.1186/1745-6215-12-58, 3055831, 21356072.
28. Wassmer G. Statistical Testing for Group Sequential and Adaptive Designs in Clinical Trials: Theoretical Concepts and Practical Application with SAS 1999, Verlag Alexander Mönch, Cologne, Germany, (in German).
29. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6 (R1). [http://www.ich.org].
30. Hunter K. Host genetics influence tumour metastasis. Nat Rev 2006, 6(2):141-146.
31. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. [http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/].