Humanitarian engagement under counter-terrorism: A conflict of norms and the emerging policy landscape

International Review of the Red Cross

Volumn 93, Issue 883, 2011, Pages 623-647

  Modirzadeh, Naz K ^a   Lewis, Dustin A ^b   Bruderlein, Claude ^c  

^a HARVARD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862182228     PISSN: 18163831     EISSN: 16075889     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1816383112000033     Document Type: Review

References (103)

1. Chief Justice Roberts, United States Supreme Court, writing on behalf of the majority, US Supreme Court, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. Ct. 2705, 2725 (2010) (internal citations omitted).
2. Geneva Convention III (GC III), Art. 9;
3. Geneva Convention IV (GC IV), Arts. 10 and 23;
4. Additional Protocol I (AP I), Art. 70;
5. Additional Protocol II (AP II), Art. 18.
6. US Supreme Court, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. Ct. 2705 (2010).
7. Heike Speiker, 'The right to give and receive humanitarian assistance', in Hans-Joachim Heintze and Andrej Zwitter (eds), International Law and Humanitarian Assistance: A Crosscut Through Legal Issues Pertaining to Humanitarianism, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2011, pp. 7-18;
8. Yoram Dinstein, 'The right to humanitarian assistance', in Naval War College Review, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2000, pp. 77-92;
9. Ruth Abril Stoffels, 'Legal regulation of humanitarian assistance in armed conflict: achievements and gaps', in International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 86, No. 855, 2004, pp. 515-546;
10. Rebecca Barber, 'Facilitating humanitarian assistance in international humanitarian and human rights law', in International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, No. 874, 2009, pp. 383-391.
11. Jean-Marie Henckaerts and Louise Doswald-Beck, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC and Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005, 'Rule 55', pp. 196-197
12. H. Speiker, above note 5, pp. 7-18.
13. Sandoz et al., above note 6, p. 41;
14. International Court of Justice (ICJ), Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment, ICJ Reports 1986, para. 242,
15. UN Security Council Res. 1964, 22 December 2010, concerning the situation in Somalia
16. UNSC Res. 1923, 25 May 2010, para. 22, concerning the situation in Chad, the Central African Republic, and Sudan
17. UNSC Res. 1894, 11 November 2009, para. 14
18. UNSC Res. 1894,11 November 2009, para. 1
19. UNSC Res. 1417, 14 June 2002, para. 5
20. Aristotle Constantinides, 'Human rights obligations and accountability of armed opposition groups: the practice of the UN Security Council', in Human Rights and International Legal Discourse, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2010, pp. 89-110.
21. UNSC Res. 1612, 26 July 2005;
22. UNSC Res. 1882, 4 August 2009;
23. UNSC Res. 1960, 16 December 2010.
24. U.N. Security Council'. Kim Lane Scheppele, 'The international standardization of national security law', in Journal of National Security Law and Policy, Vol. 4, 2010, p. 439.
25. Criminal Code Act 12 of 1995, as amended, c. 102.1-102.8 (Australia).
26. Sara Pantuliano, Kate Mackintosh, and Samir Elhawary, with Vicki Metcalfe, 'Counter-terrorism and humanitarian action: tensions, impact and ways forward', in HPG Policy Brief 43, October 2011, pp. 2-5, available at: http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/docs/7347.pdf (last visited 4 December 2011);
27. Harvard Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research, 'Humanitarian action under scrutiny: criminalizing humanitarian engagement', HPCR Working Paper, February 2011, pp. 23-25, available at: http://www. hpcrresearch.org/research/criminalizing-humanitarian-engagement (last visited 4 December 2011);
28. Kristina Thorne, 'Terror lists and humanitarian assistance', in Humanitarian Exchange Magazine, Issue 37, March 2007, available at: http://www.odihpn.org/report.asp?id=2874 (last visited 24 January 2012).
29. 18 U.S.C para. 2339A(b)(1). As of September 2011, the Secretary of State had designated forty-nine organizations as FTOs; the list is available at: http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm (last visited 4 December 2011).
30. US federal law also prohibits providing material support or resources to 'terrorists': 18 U.S.C. para. 2339A.
31. U.S.C. para. 2339A(b)(2), defined as 'instruction or teaching designed to impart a specific skill, as opposed to general knowledge'.
32. U.S.C. para. 2339A(b)(3), defined as 'advice or assistance derived from scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge'.
33. U.S.C. para. 2339A (1994 edition); 110 Stat. 1214 title III, subtitle B sec. 323, 24 April 1996.
34. Ahilan T. Arulanantham, Testimony at Oversight Hearing on Amendments to the Material Support for Terrorism Laws: Section 805 of the USA PATRIOT Act and Section 6603 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Before the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security of the House Judiciary, 10 May 2005, arguing that: '[t]o prevent outbreaks, humanitarian organizations must provide displaced people with water purification systems, toilets, tents, and other such goods which are not "medicine" but nonetheless serve an absolutely critical medical function'.
35. 'Terrorism' as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989, and 'terrorist activity' as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
36. U.S.C. para. 2339B(a)(1).
37. U.S.C. para. 2339B(d)(1)(C).
38. Holder v. HLP, Opening Brief for Humanitarian Law Project, et al., pp. 17-21.
39. Humanitarian Law Project v. Reno, 9 F.Supp.2d 1176, C.D.Cal. (1998);
40. Humanitarian Law Project v. Reno, 205 F.3d 1130, 9th Cir. (2000);
41. Humanitarian Law Project v. Ashcroft, 309 F.Supp.2d 1185, C.D.Cal. (2004);
42. Humanitarian Law Project v. United States Department of Justice, 393 F.3d 902, 9th Cir. (2004);
43. Humanitarian Law Project v. Gonzales, 380 F.Supp.2d 1134, C.D.Cal. (2005);
44. Humanitarian Law Project v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 916, 9th Cir. (2009);
45. Humanitarian Law Project v. Holder, 130 S. Ct. 48, (2009);
46. US Supreme Court, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. Ct. 2705 (2010).
47. U.S.C. para. 2339A.
48. U.S.C. para. 2339B.
49. Charles Doyle, Terrorist Material Support: An Overview of 18 U.S.C. 2339A and 2339B, Congressional Research Service, 19 July 2010, available at: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R41333.pdf (last visited 4 December 2011).
50. The Center for Constitutional Rights, which litigated the case, hosts a collection of pleadings and decisions pertaining to the case, including all the case documents referenced in this section, available at: http://ccrjustice.org/ holder-v-humanitarian-law-project (last visited 4 December 2011).
51. Holder v. HLP, Opening Brief for Humanitarian Law Project, et al., pp. 17-21.
52. Holder v. HLP, Brief for the Government (respondents), p. 14.
53. Holder v. HLP, Reply Brief for the Government (respondents), p. 38, citing Humanitarian Law Project v. Reno, 205 F.3d, 1130, 1133, 9th Cir. (2000).
54. Opening Brief for the Government (respondents), p. 61, citing De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353, 365 (1937).
55. Holder v. HLP, Reply Brief for the Government (respondents), p. 39.
56. Holder v. HLP, Brief of Amicus Curiae of the Carter Center, Christian Peacemaker Teams, Grassroots International, Human Rights Watch, International Crisis Group, the Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution at George Mason University, the Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies at Notre Dame University, Operation USA, and Peace Appeal Foundation in Support of Humanitarian Law Project, et al, 23 November 2009, pp. 25-26.
57. US Supreme Court, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. Ct. 2705, 2739 (2010).
58. Chrisje Brants and Stijn Franken, 'The protection of fundamental human rights in criminal process: general report', in Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 5, October 2009, pp. 7, 14-16.
59. Justin A. Fraterman, 'Criminalizing humanitarian relief: are US material support for terrorism laws compatible with international humanitarian law?', January 2011, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1750963 (last visited 4 December 2011);
60. Elizabeth Holland, 'Holderv. Humanitarian Law Project and the potential to cripple humanitarian assistance in armed conflict', June 2011, available at: http://ssrn. com/abstract=1939008 (last visited 4 December 2011);
61. Jennifer R. White, ' IEEPA's override authority: potential for a violation of the Geneva Conventions' right to access for humanitarian organizations?', in Michigan Law Review, Vol. 104, No. 8, 2006, pp. 2019-2055. (Pubitemid 44199024)
62. US Supreme Court, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. Ct. 2705, 2710, 2724, 2729 (2010).
63. The list of parties subject to EO 13224 are on OFAC's website, available at: http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/SDN-List/Pages/default. aspx (last visited 4 December 2011).
64. KindHearts for Charitable Humanitarian Dev., Inc. v. Geithner, 647 F. Supp.2d 857 (N.D. Ohio 2009).
65. Al Haramain Islamic Found., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of the Treasury, Civil No. 07-1155-KI, 2009 WL 3756363 (D. Or. Nov. 5, 2009);
66. Al Haramain Islamic Found., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of the Treasury, 585 F.Supp. 2d 1233 (D. Or. 2008).
67. Even U.S. citizens could face prosecution on these grounds'. Anne Richards, 'On the Libyan border: helping freedom fighters or terrorists?', The Hill's Congress Blog, 28 March 2011, available at: http://thehill.com/blogs/ congress-blog/foreign-policy/152143-on-the-libyan-border-helping-freedom- fighters-or-terrorists (last visited 4 December 2011).
68. Michael John Garcia and Ruth Ellen Wasem, Immigration: Terrorist Grounds for Exclusion and Removal of Aliens, Congressional Research Service, 12 January 2010, available at: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/RL32564.pdf (last visited 4 December 2011).
69. Steven H. Schulman, 'Victimized twice: asylum seekers and the material-support bar', in Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2009-2010, p. 949;
70. Human Rights First, Denial and Delay: The Impact of the Immigration Law's "Terrorism Bars" on Asylum Seekers and Refugees in the United States, November 2009, available at: http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/wp-content/ uploads/pdf/RPP-DenialandDelay-FULL-111009-web.pdf (last visited 4 December 2011).
71. Statement issued by USAID to the Congressional Research Service on 5 February 2009. Jim Zanotti, U.S. Foreign Aid to the Palestinians, Congressional Research Service, 13 January 2011, p. 7, available at: http://www.fas.org/sgp/ crs/mideast/RS22967.pdf (last visited 24 January 2012).
72. USAID, 'AAPD 04-14: Certification regarding Terrorist Financing Implement E.O. 13224 (Revision 2)', Acquisition & Assistance Policy Directive, 24 September 2004, p. 3, available at: http://www.usaid.gov/business/business- opportunities/cib/pdf/aapd04-14.pdf (last visited 4 December 2011).
73. Testimony of Dr Rajiv Shah, USAID Administrator, Senate Appropriations Subcommittee, 12 April 2010, available at: http://kirk.senate.gov/?p=press- release&id=137 (last visited 4 December 2011).
74. UNSC Res. 1267, 15 October 1999;
75. UNSC Res. 1333, 19 December 2000;
76. UNSC Res. 1390, 28 January 2002;
77. UNSC Res. 1455, 17 January 2003;
78. UNSC Res. 1526, 30 January 2004;
79. UNSC Res. 1617, 29 July 2005;
80. UNSC Res. 1735, 22 December 2006;
81. UNSC Res. 1822, 30 June 2008;
82. UNSC Res. 1904, 17 December 2009.
83. The Consolidated List is available at: http://www.un.org/sc/committees/ 1267/consolist.shtml (last visited 4 December 2011).
84. UNSC Res. 1373, 28 September 2001, paras. 1(d) and 2(a).
85. UNSC Res. 1456, 20 January 2003;
86. UNSC Res. 1535, 26 March 2004;
87. UNSC Res. 1624, 14 September 2005;
88. UNSC Res. 1787, 10 December 2007;
89. UNSC Res. 1805, 20 March 2008;
90. UNSC Res. 1963, 20 December 2010.
91. UNSC Res. 1373, paras. 1(b) and 2(e).
92. Antonios Tzanakopoulos, 'United Nations sanctions in domestic courts: from interpretation to defiance in Abdelrazik v. Canada, in Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2010, pp. 249-251;
93. Yvonne Terlingen, 'The United States and the UN's targeted sanctions of suspected terrorists: what role for human rights?', in Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2010, pp. 131 142.
94. Donald Rumsfeld, Transcript, Department of Defense News Briefing, 18 September 2001, available at: http://replay.web.archive.org/20041118041827/http: //www.defense.gov/transcripts/2001/t09182001-t0918sda. html (last visited 4 December 2011).
95. UNSC Res. 1916, 19 March 2010, paras. 4, 5, and 11;
96. UNSC Res. 1972, 17 March 2011.
97. Global Humanitarian Assistance, 'United States: country profile', available at: http://www.globalhumani-tarianassistance.org/countryprofile/ united-states (last visited 4 December 2011):
98. Robert Burns, 'Envoy laments weak US knowledge about Taliban', Associated Press, 7 April 2009, available at: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/ nationworld/2008961176-apusafghanistan.html (last visited 24 January 2012):
99. US Embassy, Islamabad, 'U.S. troops reach flood relief milestone, deliver 25 million pounds of aid', United States Central Command, 23 November 2010, available at: http://www.centcom.mil/pakistan-flood/u-s-troops-reach-flood- relief-milestone-deli-ver-25-million-pounds-of-aid (last visited 4 December 2011),
100. Jeffrey Gettleman, 'U.N. officials assail U.S. on limiting Somali aid', in New York Times, 18 February 2010, p. 8,
101. UN Department of Public Information, 'Press Conference by Special Rapporteur on Protecting Human Rights While Countering Terrorism', 26 October 2010, available at: http://www.un. org/News/briefings/docs/2010/101026-Scheinin. doc.htm (last visited 4 December 2011).
102. Sandoz et al., above note 6, p. 41.
103. Harvard Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research, above note 13, pp. 27-37.