Incivility and standing firm: A second layer of partisan division

PS - Political Science and Politics

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 428-434

  Wolf, Michael R ^a   Strachan, J Cherie ^b   Shea, Daniel M ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY FORT WAYNE   (United States)

^b CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Health Services and Department of Biology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862181285     PISSN: 10490965     EISSN: 15375935     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1049096512000509     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Abramowitz, A. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2. Abramowitz, A., and K. Saunders. 2008. "Is Polarization a Myth?" The Journal of Politics 70 (2): 542-55.
3. Barabas, J. 2004. "How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions." American Political Science Review 98 (4): 687-701.
4. Berelson, B., P. Lazarsfeld, andW. McPhee. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Black, E., and M. Black. 2002. The Rise of the Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Brown, P., and S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Carmines, E., and J. Stimson. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Drew, E. 2000. The Corruption of American Politics: WhatWentWrong and Why. New York: Overlook Press.
9. Fiorina, M., and S. Abrams. 2009. Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
10. Fiorina, M., S. Abrams, and J. Pope. 2005. CultureWar? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Longman.
11. Geer, J. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Hetherington, M. J., and J. D.Weiler. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Herbst, S. 2010. Rude Democracy: Civility and Incivility in American Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14. Huckfeldt, R., P. Johnson, and J. Sprague. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Huckfeldt, R., J. Morehouse Mendez, and T. Osborn. 2004. "Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogenous Networks." Political Psychology 25 (1): 65-95.
16. Jamieson, K. H., P.Waldman, and S. Sherr. 2000. "Eliminate the Negative? Categories of Analysis for Political Advertisements." In J. Thurber, C. Nelson, and D. Dulio, Crowded Airwaves: Campaign Advertising in Elections, 44-64.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17. Mutz, D. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Mutz, D. 2002. "Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice." American Political Science Review 96 (1) 111-26.
19. Pew Research Center. 2007. Broad Support for Political Compromise inWashington. January 22. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from Pew Research Center for the People and the Press: http://www.people-press.org/2007/01/22/broadsupport- for-political-compromise-in-washington/
20. Pew Research Center. 2010. Little Compromise on Compromising. September 20. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from Pew Research Center for the People and the Press: http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1735/political-compromiseunpopular-neither- party-favored-on-economy-four-in-ten-say-cutting-taxcuts-for-wealthy-hurts- economy
21. Reiter, H., and J. Stonecash. 2011. Counter Realignment: Political Change in the Northeastern United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.