Developing criteria and data to determine best options for expanding the core CODIS loci

Investigative Genetics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Ge, Jianye ^a   Eisenberg, Arthur ^a   Budowle, Bruce ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMELOGENIN;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; AUTOSOME; AVERAGE KINSHIP INDEX; COMBINED DNA INDEX SYSTEM DATABASE; FACTUAL DATABASE; FORENSIC SCIENCE; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC SELECTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATCH PROBABILITY; MUTATION RATE; PATERNAL LINEAGE; PEDIGREE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT TANDEM REPEAT; Y CHROMOSOME;

EID: 84862173997     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20412223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2041-2223-3-1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/codis/ndis-statistics, accessed on 8 August 2011.
2. Hares DR. Expanding the CODIS core loci in the United States. Forensic Sci Int Genet doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.04.012.
3. National DNA Index System (NDIS) DNA Data Acceptance Standards Operational Procedures. 2005, http://www.nlada.org/Defender/forensics/for_lib/Documents/1132070952.06/RF_GN_13_NDIS_Data_Standards%252005_31_05.pdf, accessed on 8 August 2011, National DNA Index System (NDIS) DNA Data Acceptance Standards.
4. Gill P, Fereday L, Morling N, Schneider PM. New multiplexes for Europe -- amendments and clarification of strategic development. Forens Sci Int 2006, 163:155-157.
5. Schneider PM. Expansion of the European Standard Set of DNA database loci - the current situation. Profiles in DNA 2009, 12(1):6-7., http://www.promega.com/profiles/1201/1201_06.html.
6. Gill P, Fereday L, Morling N, Schneider PM. The evolution of DNA databases -- recommendations for new European STR loci. Forens Sci Int 2006, 156:242-244.
7. Budowle B, Ge J, Chakraborty R, Eisenberg AJ, Green R, Mulero J, Lagace R, Hennessy L. Population genetic analyses of the NGM STR loci. Int J Legal Med 2011, 125(1):101-109. 10.1007/s00414-010-0516-7, 20878415.
8. Budowle B, Shea B, Niezgoda S, Chakraborty R. CODIS STR loci data from 41 sample populations. J Forens Sci 2001, 46:453-489.
9. Budowle B, Ge J, Aranda X, Planz J, Eisenberg A, Chakraborty R. Texas population substructure and its impact on estimating the rarity of y str haplotypes from DNA Evidence. J Forens Sci 2009, 54(5):1016-1021.
10. Budowle B, Masibay A, Anderson SJ, Barna C, Biega L, Brenneke S, Brown BL, Cramer J, DeGroot GA, Douglas D, Duceman B, Eastman A, Giles R, Hamill J, Haase DJ, Janssen DW, Kupferschmid TD, Lawton T, Lemire C, Llewellyn B, Moretti T, Neves J, Palaski C, Schueler S, Sgueglia J, Sprecher C, Tomsey C, Yet D. STR primer concordance study. Forens Sci Int 2001, 124(1):47-54.
11. Butler JM, Hill CR, Kline MC, Duewer DL, Sprecher CJ, McLaren RS, Rabbach DR, Krenke BE, Storts DR. The single most polymorphic STR Locus SE33 performance in U.S. populations. Forens Sci Int Genet doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2009.08.173.
12. AABB annual report. 2008, http://www.aabb.org/sa/facilities/Documents/rtannrpt08.pdf Accessed on 8 August 2011.
13. http://www.cstl.nist.gov/strbase/ Accessed on 8 August 2011.
14. Ge J, Budowle B, Aranda XG, Planz JV, Eisenberg AJ, Chakraborty R. Mutation rates at Y chromosome short tandem repeats in Texas populations. Forens Sci Int Genet 2009, 3(3):179-184.
15. Willuweit S, Roewer L. Y chromosome haplotype reference database (YHRD): update. Forens Sci Int Genet 2007, 1:83-87.
16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ Accessed on 8 August 2011.
17. O'Connor KL, Hill CR, Vallone PM, Butler JM. Linkage disequilibrium analysis of D12S391 and vWA in U.S. population and paternity samples. Forens Sci Int Genet 2011, 5(5):538-540.
18. O'Connor KL, Hill CR, Vallone PM, Butler JM. Corrigendum to "Linkage disequilibrium analysis of D12S391 and vWA in U.S. population and paternity samples.". Forens Sci Int Genet 2011, doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.09.003.
19. Phillips C, Ballard D, Gill P, Syndercombe Court D, Carracedo A, Lareu M. The recombination landscape around forensic STRs: accurate measurement of genetic distances between syntenic STR pairs using HapMap high density SNP data. Forens Sci Int Genet 2011, doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.07.012.
20. http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/downloads/recombination/latest/rates/ Accessed on 2 September 2011.
21. Weir BS. Matching and partially-matching DNA profiles. Ann Appl Stat 2007, 1(2):358-370. 10.1214/07-AOAS128, 2585748, 19030117.
22. Ge J, Chakraborty R, Eisenberg AJ, Budowle B. Comparisons of familial DNA database searching strategies. J Forensic Sci 2011, Doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01867.x.
23. Ge J, Budowle B, Chakraborty R. Choosing relatives for DNA identification of missing persons. J Forens Sci 2011, 56(s1):S23-S28.
24. Ge J, Yan JW, Budowle B, Chakraborty R, Eisenberg A. Issues on China forensic DNA database. Chinese J Forens Med 2011, 26(3):252-255.
25. Ge J, Budowle B, Planz J, Eisenberg A, Ballantyne J, Chakraborty R. US forensic Y-chromosome short tandem repeats database. Leg Med 2010, 12(6):289-295.
26. Bhoopat T, Hohoff C, Steger HF. Identification of DYS385 allele variants by using shorter amplicons and Northern Thai haplotype data. J Forensic Sci 2003, (5):1108-1112.
27. Ge J, Budowle B, Chakraborty R. Interpreting Y chromosome STR haplotype mixture. Leg Med 2010, 12(3):137-143.
28. http://www.agcu.cn/ProductView.asp?ID=55, accessed on Nov. 26th 2011.
29. National Research Council Committee on DNA Forensic Science An Update: the Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence. 1996, Washington (DC): National Academy Press, National Research Council Committee on DNA Forensic Science.