Comparison of photographic and visual assessment of occlusal caries with histology as the reference standard

BMC Oral Health

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Boye, Uriana ^a   Walsh, Tanya ^b   Pretty, Iain A ^c   Tickle, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c Dental Health Unit   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIN; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; TOOTH PULP;

BICUSPID; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL PULP; DENTIN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84862173810     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-10     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baelum V. What is an appropriate caries diagnosis?. Acta Odontol Scand 2010, 68(2):65-79. 10.3109/00016350903530786, 20141362.
2. Neuhaus KW, Ellwood R, Lussi A, Pitts NB. Traditional lesion detection aids. Monogr Oral Sci 2009, 21:42-51.
3. Sridhar N, Tandon S, Rao N. A comparative evaluation of DIAGNOdent with visual and radiography for detection of occlusal caries: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2009, 20(3):326-331. 10.4103/0970-9290.57376, 19884717.
4. Karlsson L, Johansson E, Tranaeus S. Validity and reliability of laser-induced fluorescence measurements on carious root surfaces in vitro. Caries Res 2009, 43(5):397-404. 10.1159/000239754, 19776571.
5. Kuhnisch J, Ifland S, Tranaeus S, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Comparison of visual inspection and different radiographic methods for dentin caries detection on occlusal surfaces. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009, 38(7):452-457. 10.1259/dmfr/34393803, 19767515.
6. Kuhnisch J, Goddon I, Berger S, Senkel H, Bucher K, Oehme T, Hickel R, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Development, methodology and potential of the new Universal Visual Scoring System (UniViSS) for caries detection and diagnosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009, 6(9):2500-2509. 10.3390/ijerph6092500, 2760425, 19826559.
7. Kuhnisch J, Bucher K, Henschel V, Albrecht A, Garcia-Godoy F, Mansmann U, Hickel R, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Diagnostic performance of the universal visual scoring system (UniViSS) on occlusal surfaces. Clin Oral Investig 2010, 15:215-223.
8. Pretty IA. Caries detection and diagnosis: novel technologies. J Dent 2006, 34(10):727-739. 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.06.001, 16901606.
9. Shi XQ, Welander U, Angmar-Mansson B. Occlusal caries detection with KaVo DIAGNOdent and radiography: an in vitro comparison. Caries Res 2000, 34(2):151-158. 10.1159/000016583, 10773633.
10. Pretty IA, Tavener JA, Browne D, Brettle DS, Whelton H, Ellwood RP. Quantification of dental fluorosis using fluorescence imaging. Caries Res 2006, 40(5):426-434. 10.1159/000094289, 16946612.
11. Ricketts DN, Kidd EA, Liepins PJ, Wilson RF. Histological validation of electrical resistance measurements in the diagnosis of occlusal caries. Caries Res 1996, 30(2):148-155. 10.1159/000262152, 8833140.
12. Kupietzky A, Waggoner WE, Galea J. Long-term photographic and radiographic assessment of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors: results after 3 years. Pediatr Dent 2005, 27(3):221-225.
13. Serra R, Otis L. Quantifying enamel luster. J Clin Dent 2004, 15(3):83-87.
14. Meneghim MC, Kozlowski FC, Pereira AC, Assaf AV, Tagliaferro EP. Perception of dental fluorosis and other oral health disorders by 12-year-old Brazilian children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007, 17(3):205-210. 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00821.x, 17397465.
15. Elfrink ME, Veerkamp JS, Aartman IH, Moll HA, Ten Cate JM. Validity of scoring caries and primary molar hypomineralization (DMH) on intraoral photographs. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2009, 10(Suppl 1):5-10.
16. Pitts NB, Evans DJ, Pine CM. British Association for the Study of Community Dentistry (BASCD) diagnostic criteria for caries prevalence surveys-1996/97. Community Dent Health 1997, 14(Suppl 1):6-9.
17. Pine CM, Pitts NB, Nugent ZJ. British Association for the Study of Community Dentistry (BASCD) guidance on sampling for surveys of child dental health. A BASCD coordinated dental epidemiology programme quality standard. Community Dent Health 1997, 14(Suppl 1):10-17.
18. Pine CM, Pitts NB, Nugent ZJ. British Association for the Study of Community Dentistry (BASCD) guidance on the statistical aspects of training and calibration of examiners for surveys of child dental health. A BASCD coordinated dental epidemiology programme quality standard. Community Dent Health 1997, 14(Suppl 1):18-29.
19. Ricketts DN, Watson TF, Liepins PJ, Kidd EA. A comparison of two histological validating techniques for occlusal caries. J Dent 1998, 26(2):89-96. 10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00081-4, 9540304.
20. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33(1):159-174. 10.2307/2529310, 843571.
21. Mitropoulos CM, Lennon MA, Worthington HV. A national calibration exercise for the British Association for the Study of Community Dentistry regional examiners. Community Dent Health 1990, 7(2):179-187.
22. Pitts NB, Boyles J, Nugent ZJ, Thomas N, Pine CM. The dental caries experience of 5-year-old children in Great Britain (2005/6). Surveys co-ordinated by the British Association for the study of community dentistry. Community Dent Health 2007, 24(1):59-63.
23. Pitts NB, Palmer JD. The dental caries experience of 5-, 12- and 14-year-old children in Great Britain. Surveys coordinated by the British Association for the Study of Community Dentistry in 1991/92, 1992/3 and 1990-91. Community Dent Health 1994, 11(1):42-52.
24. Weintraub JA. Pit and fissure sealants in high-caries-risk individuals. J Dent Educ 2001, 65(10):1084-1090.
25. Lizarelli RF, Bregagnolo JC, Lizarelli RZ, Palhares JM, Villa GE. A comparative in vitro study to diagnose decayed dental tissue using different methods. Photomed Laser Surg 2004, 22(3):205-210. 10.1089/1549541041438669, 15315727.
26. Ando M, van Der Veen MH, Schemehorn BR, Stookey GK. Comparative study to quantify demineralized enamel in deciduous and permanent teeth using laser- and light-induced fluorescence techniques. Caries Res 2001, 35(6):464-470. 10.1159/000047491, 11799288.
27. Wenzel A, Hintze H. Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999, 28(3):182-185. 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600438, 10740474.
28. Jacobsen JH, Hansen B, Wenzel A, Hintze H. Relationship between histological and radiographic caries lesion depth measured in images from four digital radiography systems. Caries Res 2004, 38(1):34-38. 10.1159/000073918, 14685022.
29. Jablonski-Momeni A, Ricketts DN, Stachniss V, Maschka R, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Pieper K. Occlusal caries: Evaluation of direct microscopy versus digital imaging used for two histological classification systems. J Dent 2009, 37(3):204-211. 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.11.014, 19124186.
30. Karim RB, Hage JJ, Ahmed AK, de Wit FS, van de Sandt MM, Daemen A. Digital photography as a means of enhancing interconsultant communication in oncological cutaneous surgery. Ann Plast Surg 2002, 48(2):180-183. 10.1097/00000637-200202000-00011, 11910224.
31. Jolliffe VM, Harris DW, Whittaker SJ. Can we safely diagnose pigmented lesions from stored video images? A diagnostic comparison between clinical examination and stored video images of pigmented lesions removed for histology. Clin Exp Dermatol 2001, 26(1):84-87. 10.1046/j.1365-2230.2001.00767.x, 11260186.
32. Patterson S, Botchway C. Dental screenings using telehealth technology: a pilot study. J Can Dent Assoc 1998, 64(11):806-810.