Beyond Harm, Intention, and Dyads: Relationship Regulation, Virtuous Violence, and Metarelational Morality

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 189-193

  Rai, Tage S ^a   Fiske, Alan P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862162003     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.670782     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Alicke, M. D. 1992. Culpable causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63: 368-378.
2. Carlsmith, K. M. and Sood, A. M. 2009. The fine line between interrogation and retribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45: 191-196. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.025
3. Cushman, F. 2008. Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108: 353-380. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006
4. Fiske, A. P. 2012. Metarelational models: Configurations of social relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42: 2-18. doi:10.1002/ejsp.847
5. Haidt, J. 2007. The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316: 998-1002. doi:10.1126/science.1137651
6. Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., Bloom, P. and Mahajan, N. The richness of early social evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 10819931-19936. 2011
7. Harris, L. T. and Fiske, S. T. 2006. Dehumanizing the lowest of the low. Psychological Science, 17: 847-853. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01793.x
8. Haslam, N. 2006. Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10: 252-264. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
9. Hauser, M. 2006. Moral minds: How nature designed a universal sense right and wrong, New York, NY: HarperCollins.
10. Mikhail, J. 2007. Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11: 143-152. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007
11. Pizarro, D. A. and Tannenbaum, D. 2011. "Bringing character back: How the motivation to evaluate character influences judgments of moral blame". In The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 91-108), Edited by: Mikulincer, M. and Shaver, P. R. Washington, DC: APA Press.
12. Rai, T. S. and Fiske, A. P. 2011. Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118(1): 57-75. doi:10.1037/a0021867
13. Singer, P. 1975. Animal liberation, New York, NY: Random House.
14. Tannenbaum, D., Uhlmann, E. L. and Diermeier, D. Moral signals, public outrage, and immaterial harms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 471249-1254. 2011
15. Turiel, E. 1983. The development of social knowledge: morality and convention, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Young, L. and Saxe, R. 2011. The role of intent for distinct moral domains. Cognition, 120: 202-214.