Choice behaviour and performance of Cassida stigmatica on various chemotypes of Tanacetum vulgare and implications for biocontrol

Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Volumn 144, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 78-85

  Wolf, Vera C ^a,b   Gassmann, André ^b   Müller, Caroline ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b CABI   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Asteraceae; Chrysomelidae; Coleoptera; GC MS; Host acceptance; Oviposition and feeding paired choice tests; Plant invasions; Terpenes; Weed control

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BIOCONTROL AGENT; BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CHEMOTHERAPY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HERB; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; NATURAL ENEMY; OVIPOSITION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; TERPENE; WEED CONTROL;

ASTERACEAE; CASSIDA STIGMATICA; CHRYSOMELIDAE; COLEOPTERA; DRYOBALANOPS; TANACETUM VULGARE;

EID: 84862156581     PISSN: 00138703     EISSN: 15707458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2012.01242.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adams RP (2007) Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 4th edn. Allured Publishing, Carol Stream, IL, USA.
2. Arand K & Müller C (2007) Trade-offs in oviposition choice? Food-dependent performance and defence against predators of a herbivorous sawfly. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 124: 153-159.
3. Barra A (2009) Factors affecting chemical variability of essential oils: a review of recent developments. Natural Product Communications 4: 1147-1154.
4. Blossey B & Nötzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology 83: 887-889.
5. Chrobock T, Kempel A, Fischer M & van Kleunen M (2011) Introduction bias: cultivated alien plant species germinate faster and more abundantly than native species in Switzerland. Basic and Applied Ecology 12: 244-250.
6. Davis MA (2009) Invasion Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
7. Doorduin LJ & Vrieling K (2011) A review of the phytochemical support for the shifting defence hypothesis. Phytochemistry Reviews 10: 99-106.
8. Dray FA, Bennett BC, Center TD, Wheeler GS & Madeira PT (2004) Genetic variation in Melaleuca quinquenervia affects the biocontrol agent Oxyops vitiosa. Weed Technology 18: 1400-1402.
9. Egigu MC, Ibrahim MA, Yahya A & Holopainen JK (2011) Cordeauxia edulis and Rhododendron tomentosum extracts disturb orientation and feeding behavior of Hylobius abietis and Phyllodecta laticollis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 138: 162-174.
10. Gershenzon J & Dudareva N (2007) The function of terpene natural products in the natural world. Nature Chemical Biology 3: 408-414.
11. Gripenberg S, Mayhew PJ, Parnell M & Roslin T (2010) A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecology Letters 13: 383-393.
12. Holopainen M, Hiltunen R & von Schantz M (1987) A study on tansy chemotypes. Planta Medica 53: 284-287.
13. Joshi J & Vrieling K (2005) The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecology Letters 8: 704-714.
14. Kleine S & Müller C (2011) Intraspecific plant chemical diversity and its relation to herbivory. Oecologia 166: 175-186.
15. Lokki J, Sorsa M, Forsen K & Schantz MV (1973) Genetics of monoterpenes in Chrysanthemum vulgare. 1. Genetic control and inheritance of some of the most common chemotypes. Hereditas 74: 225-232.
16. Mitich LW (1992) Intriguing world of weeds: Tansy. Weed Technology 6: 242-244.
17. Müller-Schärer H & Schaffner U (2008) Classical biological control: exploiting enemy escape to manage plant invasions. Biological Invasions 10: 859-874.
18. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U & Steinger T (2004) Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 417-422.
19. Müller C (1999) Chemische Ökologie des Phytophagenkomplexes an Tanacetum vulgare L. (Asteraceae). PhD Dissertation, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany.
20. Nerio LS, Olivero-Verbel J & Stashenko E (2010) Repellent activity of essential oils: a review. Bioresource Technology 101: 372-378.
21. Pimentel D, Zuniga R & Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52: 273-288.
22. Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J & Pigliucci M (2006) Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecology Letters 9: 981-993.
23. Schmitz G (1998) The phytophagous insect fauna of Tanacetum vulgare L. (Asteraceae) in Central Europe. Beiträge zur Entomologie 48: 219-235.
24. Thompson JN (1988) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 47: 3-14.
25. Wheeler GS (2006) Chemotype variation of the weed Melaleuca quinquenervia influences the biomass and fecundity of the biological control agent Oxyops vitiosa. Biological Control 36: 121-128.
26. Wheeler GS & Ordung KM (2005) Secondary metabolite variation affects the oviposition preference but has little effect on the performance of Boreioglycaspis melaleucae: A biological control agent of Melaleuca quinquenervia. Biological Control 35: 115-123.
27. Wheeler GS, Pratt PD, Giblin-Davis RM & Ordung KM (2007) Intraspecific variation of Melaleuca quinquenervia leaf oils in its naturalized range in Florida, the Caribbean, and Hawaii. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 35: 489-500.
28. White DJ (1997) Tanacetum vulgare L.: Weed Potential, Biology, Response to Herbivory, and Prospects for Classical Biological Control in Alberta. MSc Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
29. Wolf CV, Berger U, Gassmann A & Müller C (2011) High chemical diversity of a plant species is accompanied by increased chemical defence in invasive populations. Biological Invasions 13: 2091-2102.