A conceptual model for the implementation of an Inter-Knowledge Objects Exchange System (IKOES) in automotive industry

Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1090-1101

  Louis Sidney, Ludovic ^a,b   Cheutet, Vincent ^a   Lamouri, Samir ^c   Puron, Olivier ^b   Mezza, Antoine ^b  

^a EA 2336   (France)

^b RENAULT   (France)

^c Laboratoire Conception de Produits et Innovation   (France)

Author keywords

Data exchange; Data structuring; Parameterised knowledge objects; Redesign process

Indexed keywords

ADDED VALUES; AUTOMATED TOOLS; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; DATA STRUCTURING; INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS; PARAMETERISED KNOWLEDGE OBJECTS; PRODUCT REDESIGN; REDESIGN PROCESS; RENAULT; TECHNOLOGY DESIGNS;

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; COMPETITION; DATA ENCAPSULATION; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; PARAMETERIZATION;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84862153103     PISSN: 09521976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2011.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ash Amin, and Joanne Roberts Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice Res. Policy 37 2 2008 353 369
2. Badin, Julien, Monticolo, Davy, Chamoret, D.; Gomes, Samuel, 2010. Moving toward a product model to manage data, information and knowledge for mechanical design and simulation. In: Proceedings of the KARE10, Knowledge Acquisition, Reuse and Evaluation.
3. Baizet, Yoan, 2004. La gestion des connaissances en conception - Application à la simulation numérique chez Renault-DIEC. Ph.D. thesis of INP Grenoble, France.
4. Mordechai Ben-Ari, and Yeshno Tzippora Conceptual models of software artifacts Interacting Comput. 18 6 2006 1336 1350 (Pubitemid 44709884)
5. A. Bernard, and S. Tichkiewitch Methods and Tools for Effective Knowledge Life-cycle-management 2008 Springer
6. Eugenia Cacciatori Memory objects in project environments: storing, retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms Res. Policy 37 9 2008 1591 1601
7. Craig B. Chapman, and Martyn Pinfold The application of knowledge based engineering approach to the rapid design and analysis of an automotive structure Adv. Eng. Software 32 12 2001 903 912 (Pubitemid 33034508)
8. Guoqing Chen, Qiang Wei, De Liu, and Geert Wets Simple association rules (SAR) and the SAR-based rule discovery Comput. Ind. Eng. 43 4 2002 721 733 (Pubitemid 34991786)
9. CIMdata, 2011. cPDm - The Key to Harnessing Innovation in an E-Business World, 〈 http://www.cimdata.com/plm/definition-cpdm.html 〉 (Accessed February 2011).
10. Alfonso Iodice Denza, Francesco Palumbo, and Michael Greenacre Exploratory data analysis leading towards the most interesting simple association rules Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 52 6 2008 3269 3281
11. Jean-Louis Ermine, Mathias Chaillot, and Philippe Bigeon Méthode pour la gestion des connaissances Ingénierie des systèmes dinformation, AFCETHermès 4 4 1996 541 575
12. John S. Gero Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design AI Mag.; Am. Assoc. Artif. Intell. 11/4 1990 26 36
13. Gomadam, K.; Ranabahu, A.; Sheth, A.; 2010. SA-REST: Semantic Annotation of Web Resources. 〈http://www.w3.org/Submission/SA-REST〉 (Accessed August 2010).
14. Michel Grundstein, Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux, and Alexandre Pachulski Reinforcing decision aid by capitalizing on companys knowledge: future prospects Eur. J. Oper. Res. 45 2 2003 256 272 (Pubitemid 35411976)
15. Ching-Chih Hsu, and Sheue-Ling Hwang A study of interface design improvement in an engineering data management system on the world wide web Comput. Ind. Eng. 47 1 2004 31 43
16. J. Joo, and S.M. Lee Adoption of the semantic web for overcoming technical limitations of knowledge management systems Expert Syst. Appl. 36 3 2009 7318 7327 (Part 2)
17. Chris McMahon, Alistair Lowe, and Steve Culley Knowledge management in engineering design: personalization and codification J. Eng. Des. 15 4 2004 307 325 (Pubitemid 38905788)
18. Moka, 2000. A Framework for Structuring and Representing Engineering Knowledge. Final Synthesis. 〈 http://web1.eng.coventry.ac.uk/moka/kbe.htm 〉 (Accessed February 2011).
19. E.W.T. Ngai, and E.W.C. Chan Evaluation of knowledge management tools using AHP Expert Syst. Appl. 29 4 2005 P889 P899
20. OMGa, Miller, Joaquin, Mukerji, Jishnu, 2003. MDA Guide Version 1.0.1. 〈 http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?omg/03-06-0 〉 (Accessed February 2011).
21. OMGb. OMG, 2009. Unified Modeling Language Superstructure Version 2.2. 〈 http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.2/ 〉 (Accessed February 2011).
22. OMGc, 2011. Business Process Model and Notation Version 2. 〈 http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0 〉 (Accessed February 2011).
23. Pikosz, P.; Malmqvist, J.; 1996. Possibilities and limitations when using PDM systems to support the product development process. In: Proceedings of the NordDesign96, Helsinki. pp. 165-176.
24. G. Prudhomme, J.F. Boujut, and F. Pourroy Activités de conception et instrumentation de la dynamique des connaissances locales, Ingénierie des Connaissances, Plate-forme AFIA 2001 Presses Universitaires de Grenoble pp. 41-60
25. S.R. Ranganathan Classification, Coding and Machinery for Search 1950 UNESCO/NS/SL/3 Paris
26. W. Skarka Application of MOKA methodology in generative model creation using CATIA Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 20 2007 677 690 (Pubitemid 46856152)
27. D. Sutton, and V. Patkar CommonKADS analysis and description of a knowledge based system for assessment of breast cancer Expert Syst. Appl. 36 2 2009 2411 2423
28. E. Triantaphyllou, T.W. Liao, and S.S. Iyengar A focused issue on data mining and knowledge discovery in industrial engineering Comput. Ind. Eng. 43 4 2002 657 659 (Pubitemid 34991781)
29. Tsuchiya S.; 1993. Improving knowledge creation ability through organizational learning. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Management of Industrial and Corporate Knowledge ISMICK93, Compiegne.
30. V. Uren, P. Cimiano, J. Iria, S. Handschuh, M. Vargas-Vera, E. Motta, and F.A. Ciravegn Semantic annotation for knowledge management: requirements and a survey of the state of the art, Web Semantics: Science Serv. Agents World Wide Web 4 1 2006 14 28 (Pubitemid 43082865)
31. Antonino Vaccaro, Ronaldo Parente, and Francisco M. Veloso Knowledge management tools, inter-organizational relationships, innovation and firm performance Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 77 7 2010 1076 1089
32. M. Yoshioka, Y. Umeda, H. Takeda, Y. Shimomura, Y. Nomaguchi, and T. Tomiyama Physical concept ontology for knowledge intensive engineering framework Adv. Eng. Inf. 18 2 2004 95 113