The role of clinical decision support tools to reduce blood pressure variability in critically ill patients receiving vasopressor support

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 204-209

  Giuliano, Karen K ^a   Jahrsdoerfer, Mary ^a   Case, Jody ^b   Drew, Tara ^b   Raber, Greg ^a  

^a PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^b New Hampshire Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Blood pressure management; Clinical decision support tools; Vasopressor therapy

Indexed keywords

VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DRUG EFFECT; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INSTRUMENTATION; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITOR; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPOTENSION; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862144649     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3182418c39     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Franklin SS, Lopez VA, Wong ND, et al. Single versus combined blood pressure components and risk for cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2009;119(2):243-250.
2. Franklin SS, Khan SA, Wong ND, Larso, M, Levy D. Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart disease? The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1999;100(4):354-360. (Pubitemid 29362404)
3. Quezado ZM, Natanson C. Systemic hemodynamic abnormalities and vasopressor therapy in sepsis and septic shock. Am J Kidney Dis. 1992;20(3):214-222.
4. Sander O, Welters ID, Foëx P, Sear JW. Impact of prolonged elevated heart rate on incidence of major cardiac events in critically ill patients with a high risk of cardiac complications. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(1):81-88. (Pubitemid 40116540)
5. Relos RP, Hasinoff IK, Beilman GJ. Moderately elevated serum troponin concentrations are associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates in surgical intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(11):2598-2603. (Pubitemid 37452839)
6. Deedwania PC, Nelson JR. Pathophysiology of silent myocardial ischemia during daily life. Hemodynamic evaluation by simultaneous electrocardiographic and blood pressure monitoring. Circulation. 1990;82(4):1296-1304.
7. Diedrich A, Jordan J, Tank J, et al. The sympathetic nervous system in hypertension; assessment by blood pressure variability and ganglionic blockade. J Hypertens. 2003;21(9):1677-1686. (Pubitemid 37076351)
8. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computerbased clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 1998;280(15): 1339-1346. (Pubitemid 28473723)
9. Bryan C, Boren SA. The use and effectiveness of electronic clinical decision support tools in the ambulatory/primary care setting: a systematic review of the literature. Inform Prim Care. 2008;16(2): 79-91.
10. Berwick DM, James B, Coye MJ. Connections between quality measurement and improvement. Med Care. 2003;41(suppl 1):130-138.
11. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
12. Shiffman RN, Liaw Y, Brandt CA, Corb GJ. Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6(2):104-114. (Pubitemid 29122817)
13. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005; 293(10):1223-1238. (Pubitemid 40327908)
14. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005; 330(7494):765.
15. Drew BJ, Califf RM, Funk M, et al. Practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Clinical Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by the International Society of Computerized Electrocardiology and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. Circulation. 2004;110(17):2721-2746. (Pubitemid 39453025)