Towards an understanding of the information dynamics of the handover process in aged care settings-A prerequisite for the safe and effective use of ICT

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 81, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 452-460

  Lyhne, Svend ^a   Georgiou, Andrew ^b   Marks, Anne ^b   Tariq, Amina ^b   Westbrook, Johanna I ^b  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Handover process; Information communication technology; Information management; Long term care; Safety

Indexed keywords

AGED CARE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENTS; CODEBOOKS; COMMUNICATION MODE; FOCUS GROUPS; HANDOVER; HANDOVER PROCESS; IN-DEPTH UNDERSTANDING; INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; INFORMATION DYNAMICS; INFORMATION EXCHANGES; INFORMATION FLOWS; INFORMATION GATHERING; INFORMATION SOURCES; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICATION ERRORS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATION; PROCESS MAPPING; PROCESS MODEL; QUALITATIVE DATA;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; MAPPING; NURSING; RESEARCH;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

ARTICLE; ELDERLY CARE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NURSING HOME PATIENT; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGISTERED NURSE; RESIDENT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

AGED; COMMUNICATION; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; NURSING HOMES; PATIENT TRANSFER;

EID: 84862138565     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Australian Commission on Quality and Safety in Health Care, Clinical handover, 2010, available at: a (accessed 23.11.10). http://www.health.gov.au/internet/safety/publishing.nsf/content/PriorityProgram-05.
2. Haikerwal M., Dobb G., Ahmed T. Safe Handover: Safe Patients. Guidance on Clinical Handover for Clinicians and Managers 2006, Australian Medical Association.
3. Petersen L.A., Brennan T.A., O'Neil A.C. Does housestaff discontinuity of care increase the risk for preventable adverse events?. Ann. Intern. Med. 1994, 121:866-872.
4. Borowitz S.M., Waggoner-Fountain L.A., Bass E.J., Sledd R.M. Adequacy of information transferred at resident sign-out (in-hospital handover of care): a prospective survey. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2008, 17:6-10.
5. Singh H., Thomas E.J., Petersen L.A., Studdert D.M. Medical errors involving trainees: a study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers. Arch. Intern. Med. 2007, 167(19):2030-2036.
6. Jagsi R., Kitch B.T., Weinstein D.F., Campbell E.G., Hutter M., Weissman J.S. Residents report on adverse events and their causes. Arch. Intern. Med. 2005, 165(22):2607-2613.
7. WHO, High 5s Project-action on patient safety, available at:, November 2010. https://www.high5s.org/bin/view/Main/WebHome.
8. Yee K.C., Wong M.C., Turner P. HAND ME AN ISOBAR: a pilot study of an evidence-based approach to improving shift-to-shift clinical handover. MJA 2009, 11:121-124.
9. Centre for Health Communication, University of Technology Sydney, The National Clinical Handover Initiative, Helics, 2008.
10. Stead K., Pirone C., Adams R., Phillips P., Kumar S., Schultz T. TeamSTEPPS Implementation of a Teamwork Programme Into an Australian Setting Public Report on Pilot Study 2009, Safety and Quality Unit, Department of Health, SA.
11. Australian Commission on Safety, Quality in Health Care The OSSIE Guide to Clinical Handover Improvement 2009, Sydney, ACSQHC.
12. Tang C., Carpendale S., Scott S. InfoFlow framework for evaluating information flow and new health. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2010, 26(5):477-505.
13. Raptis D., Fernandes C., Chua W., Boulos P.B. Electronic software significantly improves quality of handover in a London teaching hospital. Health Informat. J. 2009, 15:163-165.
14. Wong M.C., Turner P., Yee K.C. Socio-cultural issues and patient safety: a case study. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2007, 130:279-289.
15. M.R. McGee-Lennon, M. Carberry, P.D. Gray, HECTOR: a PDA based clinical handover, DCS Technical Report Series, 2007, 1-14.
16. British Medical Association Making IT Work for Hospital Juniors 2003, British Medical Association, London.
17. Beach C., Croskerry P., Shapiro M. Profiles in patient safety: emergency care transitions. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2003, 10(4):364-367.
18. Mtic J., Davidson P.M., Salamonson Y. Review: bringing patient safety to the forefront through structured computerisation during clinical handover. J. Clin. Nurs. 2009.
19. Chacko V., Varvarelis N., Kemp D.G. eHand-offs: an IBM(R) Lotus(R) Domino(R) application for ensuring patient safety and enhancing resident supervision in hand-off communications. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2006, 874.
20. Commonwealth Australia National Strategy for an Ageing Australia-An Older Australia, Challenges and Opportunities for all 2001.
21. Doherty G., McKnight J., Luz S. Fieldwork for requirements: frameworks for mobile healthcare applications. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2010, 68:760-776.
22. Stommel M., Wills C.E. Clinical Research-Concepts and Principles for Advanced Practice Nursing 2004, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
23. Hudak S., Sharkey S. Health Information Technology: Are Long Term Care Providers Ready? 2007, Prepared for the California Healthcare Foundation.
24. Pacicco S. The current state of EMRs in LTC settings. Nurs. Homes 2008, 57(2):34-37.
25. Access Economics, Nurses in residential aged care, available at: (accessed 19.04.10). http://www.accesseconomics.com.au/publicationsreports/getreport.php%3Freport.
26. Microsoft Microsoft Office 2010, available at: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/.
27. Kaufman D.R., Roberts W.D., Merrill J., Lai T.Y., Bakken S. Applying an evaluation framework for health information system design, development, and implementation. Nurs. Res. 2006, 55(S2):37-42.
28. Lawrence R.H., Tomolo A.M., Garlisi A.P., Aron D. Conceptualizing handover strategies at change of shift in the emergency department: a grounded theory study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2008, 8:256.
29. Horsky J., Zhang J., Patel V.L. Commentary: to err is not entirely human: complex technology and user cognition. J. Biomed. Inform. 2005, 38:264-266.
30. Edwards A., Fitzpatrick L.A., Augustine S., Trzebucki A., Lai C.S., Presseau C. Synchronous communication facilitates interruptive workflow for attending physicians and nurses in clinical settings. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2009, 78(9):629-637.
31. Saleem J.J., Russ A.L., Justice C.F., Hagg H., Ebright P.R., Woodbrigde P.A. Exploring the persistence of paper with the electronic health record. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2009, 78(9):618-628.
32. Eastes L. Use of the personal digital assistant for point-of-care trauma documentation. J. Emerg. Nurs. 2001, 27:516-518.
33. Prgomet M., Georgiou A., Westbrook J.I. The impact of mobile handheld technology on hospital physician work practices and patient care: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Ass. 2009, 16:792-801.
34. Cheah L.P., Amott D.H., Pollard J., Watters D.A.K. Electronic medical handover: towards safer medical care. Med. J. Aust. 2005, 183(7):369.