Combining dual-continuum approach with diffusion wave model to include a preferential flow component in hillslope scale modeling of shallow subsurface runoff

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 44, Issue , 2012, Pages 113-125

  Dusek, Jaromir ^a   Vogel, Tomas ^a   Dohnal, Michal ^a   Gerke, Horst H ^b  

^a CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^b LEIBNIZ CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE RESEARCH ZALF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Boussinesq equation; Dual permeability model; Hillslope discharge; Preferential flow; Richards' equation; Shallow subsurface runoff

Indexed keywords

BOUSSINESQ EQUATIONS; DUAL-PERMEABILITY MODELS; HILLSLOPE DISCHARGE; PREFERENTIAL FLOWS; RICHARDS' EQUATION; SHALLOW SUBSURFACE;

CATCHMENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTINUUM MECHANICS; DIFFUSION; GROUNDWATER FLOW; NATURAL WATER GEOCHEMISTRY; SOILS; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; THUNDERSTORMS;

RUNOFF;

BOUSSINESQ EQUATION; CATCHMENT; FLOW MODELING; HEADWATER; HILLSLOPE; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; PEAK DISCHARGE; POROSITY; PREFERENTIAL FLOW; RICHARDS EQUATION; RUNOFF; SOIL PROFILE;

EID: 84862124499     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Wienhofer J., Germer K., Lindenmaier F., Faerber A., Zehe E. Applied tracers for the observation of subsurface stormflow at the hillslope scale. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2009, 13:1145-1161.
2. van Verseveld W.J., McDonnell J.J., Lajtha K. The role of hillslope hydrology in controlling nutrient loss. J Hydrol 2009, 367:177-187. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.00.
3. Fox G.A., Wilson G.V. The role of subsurface flow in hillslope and stream bank erosion: a review. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2010, 74:717-733. 10.2136/sssaj2009.031.
4. Rigon R., Bertoldi G., Over T.M. GEOtop: a distributed hydrological model with coupled water and energy budgets. J Hydrometeorol 2006, 7:371-388.
5. Hopp L., Harman C., Desilets S.L.E., Graham C.B., McDonnell J.J., Troch P.A. Hillslope hydrology under glass: confronting fundamental questions of soil-water-biota co-evolution at Biosphere 2. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2009, 13:2105-2118.
6. Nieber J.L., Sidle R.C. How do disconnected macropores in sloping soils facilitate preferential flow?. Hydrol Process 2010, 24:1582-1594. 10.1002/hyp.763.
7. Faeh A.O., Scherrer S., Naef F. A combined field and numerical approach to investigate flow processes in natural macroporous soils under extreme precipitation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 1997, 4:787-800.
8. Kosugi K., Uchida T., Mizuyama T. Numerical calculation of soil pipe flow and its effect on water dynamics in a slope. Hydrol Process 2004, 18:777-789. 10.1002/hyp.136.
9. Tani M. Analysis of runoff-storage relationships to evaluate the runoff-buffering potential of a sloping permeable domain. J Hydrol 2008, 360:132-146. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.02.
10. Paniconi C., Troch P.A., van Loon E.E., Hilberts A.G.J. Hillslope-storage Boussinesq model for subsurface flow and variable source areas along complex hillslopes: 2. Intercomparison with a three-dimensional Richards equation model. Water Resour Res 2003, 39:1317. 10.1029/2002WR00173.
11. Vogel T, Tesař M, Císlerová M. Modeling water regime in a small watershed. In: International conference on small catchment hydrology, Institute of Hydrodynamics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic; 2003, p. 127-36. ISBN 80-02-01586-X.
12. Cordano E., Rigon R. A perturbative view on the subsurface water pressure response at hillslope scale. Water Resour Res 2008, 44:W05407. 10.1029/2006WR00574.
13. Beven K. Kinematic subsurface stormflow. Water Resour Res 1981, 17:1419-1424.
14. Beven K. Interflow. In: Morel-Seytoux HJ, editor. Unsaturated flow in hydrological modelling - theory and practice. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Acad.; 1989. p. 191-219.
15. Fan Y., Bras R. Analytical solutions to hillslope subsurface storm flow and saturation overland flow. Water Resour Res 1998, 34:921-927.
16. Troch P., van Loon E., Hilberts A. Analytical solutions to a hillslope-storage kinematic wave equation for subsurface flow. Adv Water Resour 2002, 25:637-649.
17. Troch P.A., Paniconi C., van Loon E.E. Hillslope-storage Boussinesq model for subsurface flow and variable source areas along complex hillslopes: 1. Formulation and characteristic response. Water Resour Res 2003, 39:1316. 10.1029/2002WR00172.
18. Hilberts A.G.J., Troch P.A., Paniconi C., Boll J. Low-dimensional modeling of hillslope subsurface flow: relationship between rainfall, recharge, and unsaturated storage dynamics. Water Resour Res 2007, 43:W03445. 10.1029/2006WR00496.
19. Vogel T., Sanda M., Dusek J., Dohnal M., Votrubova J. Using oxygen-18 to study the role of preferential flow in the formation of hillslope runoff. Vadose Zone J 2010, 9:252-259. 10.2136/vzj2009.006.
20. Gerke H.H., van Genuchten M.T. A dual-porosity model for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media. Water Resour Res 1993, 29:305-319.
21. Sanda M., Kulasova A., Cislerova M. Hydrological processes in the subsurface investigated by water isotopes and silica. Soil Water Res 2009, 4:S83-S92.
22. Hrncir M., Sanda M., Kulasova A., Cislerova M. Runoff formation in a small catchment at hillslope and catchment scales. Hydrol Process 2010, 24:2248-2256. 10.1002/hyp.761.
23. Sanda M., Cislerova M. Transforming hydrographs in the hillslope subsurface. J Hydrol Hydromech 2009, 57:264-275. 10.2478/v10098-009-0023-z.
24. Boussinesq J. Essai sur la théorie des eaux courantes. Mem Acad Sci Inst Fr 1877, 23:1-680.
25. Vogel T. Simplified dual continuum approach to modeling subsurface runoff from a hillslope segment. In: General assembly, European Geophysical Union, Vienna, Austria; 2005.
26. Gerke H.H., van Genuchten M.T. Evaluation of a first-order water transfer term for variably saturated dual-porosity models. Water Resour Res 1993, 29:1225-1238.
27. Vogel T., Brezina J., Dohnal M., Dusek J. Physical and numerical coupling in dual-continuum modeling of preferential flow. Vadose Zone J 2010, 9:260-267. 10.2136/vzj2009.009.
28. Ray C., Vogel T., Dusek J. Modeling depth-variant and domain-specific sorption and biodegradation in dual-permeability media. J Contam Hydrol 2004, 70:63-87. 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2003.08.00.
29. Gerke H.H., Dusek J., Vogel T., Köhne J.M. Two-dimensional dual-permeability analyses of a bromide tracer experiment on a tile-drained field. Vadose Zone J 2007, 6:651-667. 10.2136/vzj2007.003.
30. Dusek J., Vogel T., Lichner L., Cipakova A. Short-term transport of cadmium during a heavy-rain event simulated by a dual-continuum approach. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 2010, 173:536-547. 10.1002/jpln.20080028.
31. Vogel T., van Genuchten M.T., Cislerova M. Effect of the shape of soil hydraulic properties near saturation on numerical simulation of variably-saturated flow. Adv Water Resour 2000, 24:133-144. 10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00037-3.
32. Dohnal M., Dusek J., Vogel T., Herza J., Tacheci P. Analysis of soil water response to grass transpiration. Soil Water Res 2006, 1:85-98.
33. Dohnal M., Dusek J., Vogel T. The impact of the retention curve hysteresis on prediction of soil water dynamics. J Hydrol Hydromech 2006, 54:258-268.
34. Monteith J.L. Evaporation and surface temperature. JCR database 1981, 107:1-27.
35. Feddes RA, Kowalik PJ, Zaradny H. Simulation of field water use and crop yield. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation; 1978.
36. Weiler M., McDonnell J.J. Virtual experiments: a new approach for improving process conceptualization in hillslope hydrology. J Hydrol 2004, 285:3-18. 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00271-3.
37. Hilberts A.G.J., Troch P.A., Paniconi C. Storage-dependent drainable porosity for complex hillslopes. Water Resour Res 2005, 41:W06001. 10.1029/2004WR00372.
38. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 1970, 10:282-290.
39. Genereux D.P., Hemond H.F., Mulholland P.J. Spatial and temporal variability in streamflow generation on the west fork of walker branch watershed. J Hydrol 1993, 142:137-166.
40. Famiglietti J.S., Rudnicki J.W., Rodell M. Variability in surface moisture content along a hillslope transect: Rattlesnake Hill, Texas. J Hydrol 1998, 210:259-281.
41. Harman C., Sivapalan M. Effects of hydraulic conductivity variability on hillslope-scale shallow subsurface flow response and storage-discharge relations. Water Resour Res 2009, 45:W01421. 10.1029/2008WR00722.
42. Chapman T.G. Recharge-induced groundwater flow over a plane sloping bed: solutions for steady and transient flow using physical and numerical models. Water Resour Res 2005, 41:W07027. 10.1029/2004WR00360.
43. Anderson A.E., Weiler M., Alila Y., Hudson R.O. Subsurface flow velocities in a hillslope with lateral preferential flow. Water Resour Res 2009, 45:W11407. 10.1029/2008WR00712.
44. Holländer H.M., Blume T., Bormann H., Buytaert W., Chirico G.B., Exbrayat J.F., et al. Comparative predictions of discharge from an artificial catchment (Chicken Creek) using sparse data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2009, 13:2069-2094.
45. Vogel T, Dusek J. Comparison of two different approaches to modeling subsurface runoff at the hillslope scale. In: General assembly, European Geophysical Union, Vienna, Austria; 2006.
46. Neuman S.P. On methods of determining specific yield. Ground Water 1987, 25:679-684.
47. Jones J.A.A. Pipeflow contributing areas and runoff response. Hydrol Process 1997, 11:35-41.
48. Weill S., Mouche E., Patin J. A generalized Richards equation for surface/subsurface flow modelling. J Hydrol 2009, 366:9-20. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.00.