Using an eye-tracker to assess the effectiveness of a three-dimensional riding simulator in increasing hazard perception

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 274-276

  Alberti, Concetta F ^a   Gamberini, Luciano ^a   Spagnolli, Anna ^a   Varotto, Diego ^a   Semenzato, Luca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; EDUCATION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; OCULOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; VISION;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADULT; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RISK ASSESSMENT; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84862106388     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0610     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Treat JR, Tumbas NS, McDonald ST, et al. (1979) Tri-level study of the causes of traffic accidents. In Causal Factor Tabulations and Assessments, vol. 1. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Institute for Research in Public Safety. Report No. DOT-HS-034-3-535-77 (TAC).
2. McKnight AJ, McKnight AS. Young novice drivers: careless or clueless? Accident Analysis and Prevention 2003; 35: 921-925.
3. Shinar D. Looks are (almost) everything: where drivers look to get information. Human Factors 2008; 50:380-384.
4. Mourant, RR, Rockwell TH. Strategies of visual search by novice and experienced drivers. Human Factors 1972; 14: 325-335.
5. Crundall D, Chapman P, Phelps N, et al. Eye movements and hazard perception in police pursuit and emergency response driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2003; 9:163-174.
6. Fisher DL, Laurie NE, Glaser R, et al. The use of an advanced driving simulator to evaluate the effects of training and experience on drivers behavior in risky traffic scenarios. Human Factors 2002; 44:287-302.
7. Pollatsek A, Narayanaan V, Pradhan A, et al. Using eye movements to evaluate a PC-based risk awareness and perception training program on a driving simulator. Human Factors 2006; 48:447-464.
8. Pollatsek A, Fisher DL, Pradhan A. Identifying and remedying failures of selective attention in younger drivers. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2006; 15: 255-259.
9. Wiederhold BA, Wiederhold MD. (2006) Communication and experience in clinical psychology and neurorehabilita-tion: the use of virtual reality driving simulators. In: Riva G, Anguera MT, Wiederhold BK, Mantovani F, eds. From communication to presence: cognition, emotions and culture towards the ultimate communicative experience. Festschrift in honor of Luigi Anolli. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 262-275.
10. Ivancic K, Hesketh B. Learning from errors in a driving simulation: effects on driving skill and self-confidence. Ergonomics 2000; 43:1966-1984.
11. Gamberini L, Spagnolli A, Furlan S, et al. Users' performance with a riding simulation: the role of social setting. IxD&A\-Interaction Design and Architecture(s) 2009;59-62.
12. Liu CC, Hosking SG, Lennè MG. Hazard perception abilities of experienced and novice motorcyclists: an interactive simulator experiment. Transportation Research Part F 2009; 12:325-334.
13. Ragan ED, Sowndararajan A, Kopper R, et al. The effects of higher levels of immersion on procedure memorization performance and implications for educational virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2010; 19:527-543.
14. Shahar A, Alberti CF, Clarke D, et al. Hazard Perception as a function of target location and the field of view. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2010; 42:1577-1584.