How screen transitions influence touch and pointer interaction across angled display arrangements

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 209-212

  Hennecke, Fabian ^a   Matzke, Wolfgang ^a   Butz, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Display connection; Dragging; Interactive surfaces; Tabletops; Transition

Indexed keywords

DRAGGING; INTERACTIVE SURFACES; MULTIPLE DISPLAYS; OFFICE ENVIRONMENTS; POINTING DEVICES; TABLETOPS; TASK COMPLETION TIME; TRANSITION; USER SATISFACTION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; TOUCH SCREENS;

DISPLAY DEVICES;

EID: 84862101185     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2207676.2207705     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Acer: http://us.acer.com/ac/en/US/content/iconia. Accessed: 2012-12-28.
2. Ball, R. and North, C. 2005. An Analysis of User Behavior on High-Resolution Tiled Displays. INTERACT 2005 (2005), 350-363.
3. Baudisch, P. et al. 2004. Mouse ether: accelerating the acquisition of targets across multi-monitor displays. CHI 2004 (2004), 1379-1382.
4. Microsoft: 2007. http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/jeff/10- 23convergence.mspx. Accessed: 2011-12-28.
5. Foley, J.D. et al. 1984. The human factors of computer graphics interaction techniques. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 4, 11 (1984), 10-48.
6. Forlines, C. et al. 2007. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. CHI 2007 (2007), 647-656.
7. Grudin, J. 2001. Partitioning digital worlds: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use. CHI 2001 (2001), 458-465.
8. Guiard, Y. 1987. Asymmetric Division of Labor in Human Skilled Bimanual Action: The Kinematic Chain as a Model. Journal of Motor Behavior. 19, 4 (1987), 486-517.
9. Hinckley, K. et al. 2004. Stitching: pen gestures that span multiple displays. AVI 2004 (2004), 23-31.
10. ISO 9241-9 Ergonomic Requirements for Work with Visual Display Terminals, Non-keyboard Input Device Requirements. (2000).
11. MacKenzie, I.S. et al. 2001. Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices. CHI 2001 (2001), 9-16.
12. Reetz, A. et al. Superflick: a Natural and Efficient Technique for Long-Distance Object Placement on Digital Tables. GI 2006 163-170.
13. Robertson, G. et al. 2005. The large-display user experience. IEEE computer graphics and applications. 25, 4 (2005), 44-51.
14. Tognazzini, B. 1994. The "Starfire" Video Prototype A Case History. CHI 1994 (1994), 99-105.
15. Uray, P. et al. 2005. MRI - A Mixed Reality Interface for the Masses. SIGGRAPH 2006 (2005), 3-3.
16. Weiss, M. et al. 2010. BendDesk: Dragging Across the Curve. ITS 2010 (2010), 1-10.
17. Wimmer, R. et al. 2010. Curve: Revisiting the Digital Desk. NordiCHI 2010 (2010), 561-570.