Clinical and economic impact of adhesiolysis during repeat cesarean delivery

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 91, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 719-725

  Sikirica, Vanja ^a   Broder, Michael S ^b   Chang, Eunice ^b   Hinoul, Piet ^a   Robinson, David ^a   Wilson, Malcolm ^c  

^a ETHICON INC   (United States)

^b PARTNERSHIP FOR HEALTH ANALYTIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^c CHRISTIE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

adhesion; Cesarean; complication; economics; length of stay

Indexed keywords

ADHESIOLYSIS; ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBOLISM; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDICAL RECORD; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THROMBOPHLEBITIS; TISSUE ADHESION; TRANSFUSION; UNITED STATES; WOUND COMPLICATION;

ADULT; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY; PROPENSITY SCORE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; TISSUE ADHESIONS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84862095224     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01395.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alpay Z, Saed GM, Diamond MP,. Postoperative adhesions: from formation to prevention. Semin Reprod Med. 2008; 26: 313-21.
2. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ,. Births: preliminary data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009; 57: 1-23.
3. Taffel SM, Placek PJ, Liss T,. Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise. Am J Public Health. 1987; 77: 955-9. (Pubitemid 17126600)
4. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ,. Births: preliminary data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010; 58: 1-17.
5. Stark M, Hoyme UB, Stubert B, Kieback D, di Renzo GC,. Post-cesarean adhesions - are they a unique entity? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008; 21: 513-6.
6. Hamel K,. Incidence of adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196: e31-2. (Pubitemid 46627462)
7. Phipps MG, Watabe B, Clemons JL, Weitzen S, Myers DL,. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105: 156-60. (Pubitemid 40189926)
8. Kumar S, Wong PF, Leaper DJ,. Intra-peritoneal prophylactic agents for preventing adhesions and adhesive intestinal obstruction after non-gynaecological abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(1): CD005080. DOI:.
9. Ahmad G, Duffy JMN, Farquhar C, Vail A, Vanderkerchove P, Watson A, et al,. Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(2): CD000475. DOI:.
10. Metwally ME, Watson A, Lilford R, Vanderkerchove P,. Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(2): CD001298. DOI:.
11. Bruce FC, Berg CJ, Hornbrook MC, Whitlock EP, Callaghan WM, Bachman DJ, et al,. Maternal morbidity rates in a managed care population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 1089-95. (Pubitemid 351620342)
12. Berg CJ, MacKay AP, Qin C, Callaghan WM,. Overview of maternal morbidity during hospitalization for labor and delivery in the United States: 1993-1997 and 2001-2005. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 1075-81.
13. Henry OA, Gregory KD, Hobel CJ, Platt LD,. Using ICD-9 codes to identify indications for primary and repeat cesarean sections: agreement with clinical records. Am J Public Health. 1985; 75: 1143-5.
14. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB,. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Stat. 1985; 39: 33-8.
15. Cheong YC, Premkumar G, Metwally M, Peacock JL, Li TC,. To close or not to close? A systematic review and a meta-analysis of peritoneal non-closure and adhesion formation after caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009; 147: 3-8.
16. Tulandi T, Agdi M, Zarei A, Miner L, Sikirica V,. Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201: 56.e1-6.
17. Morales KJ, Gordon MC, Bates GW Jr,. Postcesarean delivery adhesions associated with delayed delivery of infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196: 461.e1-6.
18. Menacker F,. Trends in Cesarean rates for first births and repeat Cesarean rates for low-risk women: United States, 1990-2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005; 54: 1-8.
19. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S, et al,. Births: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009; 57: 1-102.
20. Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M, Henderson SC, Perry S,. Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg. 1998; 186: 1-9. (Pubitemid 28104036)
21. DeFrances CJ, Cullen KA, Kozak LJ,. National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2005 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. Vital Health Stat. 2007;(165): 1-209.
22. Robertson D, Lefebvre G, Leyland N, Wolfman W, Allaire C, Awadalla A, et al,. Adhesion prevention in gynaecological surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010; 32: 598-602.
23. Doody KJ,. Treatment of the infertile couple. In:, Schorge JO, Schafer JI, Halvorson LM, Hoffman BL, Bradshaw KD, Cunningham G, (eds). Willliams gynecology. New York, NJ: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2009. Accessed 1 July 2010.
24. Hogan MC, Foreman KJ, Naghavi M, Ahn SY, Wang M, Makela SM, et al,. Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980-2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. Lancet. 2010; 375: 1609-23.