Looking glass: A field study on noticing interactivity of a shop window

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 297-306

  Müller, Jörg ^a   Walter, Robert ^a   Bailly, Gilles ^a   Nischt, Michael ^a   Alt, Florian ^b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interactivity; Noticing interactivity; Public displays; User representation

Indexed keywords

FIELD STUDIES; HONEYPOTS; INTERACTIVE INSTALLATIONS; INTERACTIVITY; MULTIPLE ROWS; PUBLIC DISPLAY; USER REPRESENTATION; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

EID: 84862086430     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2207676.2207718     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Brignull, H., and Rogers, Y. Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In Proc. of INTERACT '03 (2003), 17-24.
2. Cutting, J. E., and Kozlowski, L. T. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9, 5 (1977), 353-356.
3. Dix, A., Finlay, J. E., Abowd, G. D., and Beale, R. Human-Computer Interaction (3rd Edition). Prentice-Hall, Inc., 2003.
4. Gallup JR, G. G. Chimpanzees: Self-recognition. Science 167, 3914 (1970), 86-87.
5. Heikenfeld, J., Drzaic, P., Yeo, J.-S., and Koch, T. A critical review of the present and future prospects for electronic paper. Journal of the Society for Information Display 19, 2 (2011), 129-156.
6. Hilliges, O., Izadi, S., Wilson, A. D., Hodges, S., Garcia-Mendoza, A., and Butz, A. Interactions in the air: adding further depth to interactive tabletops. In Proc. of UIST '09, A. D. Wilson and F. Guimbretière, Eds., ACM (2009), 139-148.
7. Hinrichs, U., and Carpendale, S. Gestures in the wild: studying multi-touch gesture sequences on interactive tabletop exhibits. In Proc. of CHI '11, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 3023-3032.
8. Huang, E., Koster, A., and Borchers, J. Overcoming assumptions and uncovering practices: When does the public really look at public displays? In Proc. of Pervasive '08. Springer, 2008, 228-243.
9. Jacucci, G., Morrison, A., Richard, G. T., Kleimola, J., Peltonen, P., Parisi, L., and Laitinen, T. Worlds of information: designing for engagement at a public multi-touch display. In Proc. of CHI '10, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 2267-2276.
10. Jeannerod, M. The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behavioural Brain Research 142, 1-2 (2003), 1-15.
11. Ju, W., and Sirkin, D. Animate objects: How physical motion encourages public interaction. In PERSUASIVE'10 (2010), 40-51.
12. Kozlowski, L. T., and Cutting, J. E. Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception Psychophysics 21, 6 (1977), 575-580.
13. Krueger, M. W. Artificial reality II. Addison-Wesley, 1991.
14. Kules, B., Kang, H., Plaisant, C., Rose, A., and Shneiderman, B. Immediate usability: a case study of public access design for a community photo library. Interacting with Computers 16, 6 (2004), 1171-1193.
15. Landis, J. R., and Koch, G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 1 (1977), 159-174.
16. Marshall, P., Morris, R., Rogers, Y., Kreitmayer, S., and Davies, M. Rethinking 'multi-user': an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface. In Proc. of CHI '11 (2011), 3033-3042.
17. Michelis, D., and Mueller, J. The audience funnel. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2010).
18. Mitchell, R. W. Mental models of mirror-self-recognition: Two theories. New Ideas in Psychology 11, 3 (1993), 295-325.
19. Müller, J., Alt, F., Michelis, D., and Schmidt, A. Requirements and design space for interactive public displays. In Proc. of ACM Multimedia '10, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 1285-1294.
20. Norman, D. A. Affordance, conventions, and design. interactions 6 (May 1999), 38-43.
21. Norman, D. A. The way i see it: Signifiers, not affordances. interactions 15 (November 2008), 18-19.
22. Peltonen, P., Kurvinen, E., Salovaara, A., Jacucci, G., Ilmonen, T., Evans, J., Oulasvirta, A., and Saarikko, P. It's mine, don't touch!: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. In Proc. of CHI '08, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2008), 1285-1294.
23. Reeves, S., Benford, S., O'Malley, C., and Fraser, M. Designing the spectator experience. In Proc. of CHI '05, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2005), 741-750.
24. Schmidt, A. Implicit human computer interaction through context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 4, 2/3 (2000), 191-199.
25. Scholl, B. J., and Tremoulet, P. D. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 8 (2000), 299-309.
26. Shoemaker, G., Tang, A., and Booth, K. S. Shadow reaching: a new perspective on interaction for large displays. In Proc. of UIST '07, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2007), 53-56.
27. Wilson, M. Perceiving imitatible stimuli: Consequences of isomorphism between input and output. Psychological Bulletin 127, 4 (2001), 543-553.