Irritant contact dermatitis: Effect of age

Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 138-143

  Zhai, Hongbo ^a   Meier Davis, Susan R ^b   Cayme, Brenda ^b   Shudo, Jutaro ^a,b   Maibach, Howard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NEC Corporation of America   (United States)

Author keywords

cumulative; Irritant; occlusion; percutaneous absorption; sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS); transdermal products; transepidermal water loss (TEWL)

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGING; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; INFLAMMATORY CELL; IRRITANT DERMATITIS; MICROCIRCULATION; REVIEW; SKIN BLOOD VESSEL; STRATUM CORNEUM; TURNOVER TIME;

ADMINISTRATION, CUTANEOUS; AGE FACTORS; DERMATITIS, IRRITANT; HUMANS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS;

EID: 84862078880     PISSN: 15569527     EISSN: 15569535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/15569527.2011.618472     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Weltfriend S, Maibach HI. Irritant dermatitis: clinical heterogeneity and contributing factors. In: Zhai H, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology, 7th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008, 125-138.
2. Ale IS, Maibach HI. Mechanisms in irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. In: Zhai H, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology, 7th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008, 159-167.
3. Chew A-L, Maibach HI. Classification of irritant contact dermatitis. In: Zhai H, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology, 7th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008, 923-926.
4. Berardesca E, Distante F. The modulation of skin irritation. Contact Derm 1994;31:281-287.
5. Wilhelm KP. Irritant dermatitis: experimental aspects. Curr Probl Dermatol 1995;23:144-151.
6. Wilhelm KP, Surber C, Maibach HI. Quantification of sodium lauryl sulfate irritant dermatitis in man: comparison of four techniques: skin color reflectance, transepidermal water loss, laser Doppler flow measurement and visual scores. Arch Dermatol Res 1989;281:293-295.
7. Agner T, Serup J. Seasonal variation of skin resistance to irritants. Br J Dermatol 1989;121:323-328.
8. Agner T. Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1992;173:1-26.
9. Lee CH, Maibach HI. The sodium lauryl sulfate model: an overview. Contact Derm 1995;33:1-7.
10. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview. Contact Derm 2001;44:201-206.
11. Branco N, Lee I, Zhai H, Maibach HI. Long-term repetitive sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritation of the skin: an in vivo study. Contact Derm 2005;53:278-284.
12. Kartono F, Maibach HI. Irritants in combination with synergistic or additive effect on skin response: overview of tandem irritation studies. In: Zhai H, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology, 7th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008, 959-966.
13. Patil S, Maibach HI. Effect of age and sex on the elicitation of irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Derm 1994;30:257-264.
14. Harvell JD, Maibach HI. Percutaneous absorption and inflammation in aged skin: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31:1015-1021.
15. Robinson MK. Population differences in skin structure and physiology and the susceptibility to irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: implications for skin safety testing and risk assessment. Contact Derm 1999;41:65-79.
16. Farage MA, Miller KW, Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Clinical implications of aging skin: cutaneous disorders in the elderly. Am J Clin Dermatol 2009;10:73-86.
17. Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ. The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI, eds. Handbook of Occupational Dermatology, Berlin: Springer, 2000, 3-16.
18. Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Contact dermatitis due to irritation. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI, eds. Handbook of Occupational Dermatology, Berlin: Springer, 2000, 99-110.
19. Tsai T-F. Water: Is it an Irritant? In: Zhai H, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology, 7th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008, 279-282.
20. Fluhr JW, Darlenski R, Angelova-Fischer I, Tsankov N, Basketter D. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment. 1. Skin irritation. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2008;21:124-135.
21. Chew AL, Maibach HI, eds. Irritant Dermatitis. Springer: Berlin, 2006.
22. Rizwan M, Aqil M, Talegaonkar S, Azeem A, Sultana Y, Ali A. Enhanced transdermal drug delivery techniques: an extensive review of patents. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul 2009;3:105-124.
23. Kaestli LZ, Wasilewski-Rasca AF, Bonnabry P, Vogt-Ferrier N. Use of transdermal drug formulations in the elderly. Drugs Aging 2008;25:269-280.
24. Grove GL, Duncan S, Kligman AM. Effect of ageing on the blistering of human skin with ammonium hydroxide. Br J Dermatol 1982;107:393-400.
25. Cua AB, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI. Cutaneous sodium lauryl sulphate irritation potential: age and regional variability. Br J Dermatol 1990;123:607-613.
26. Elsner P, Wilhelm D, Maibach HI. Sodium lauryl sulfateinduced irritant contact dermatitis in vulvar and forearm skin of premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;23:648-652.
27. Elsner P, Wilhelm D, Maibach HI. Irritant effect of a model surfactant on the human vulva and forearm. Age-related differences. J Reprod Med 1990;35:1035-1039.
28. Elsner P, Wilhelm D, Maibach HI. Effect of low-concentration sodium lauryl sulfate on human vulvar and forearm skin. Agerelated differences. J Reprod Med 1991;36:77-81.
29. Schwindt DA, Wilhelm KP, Miller DL, Maibach HI. Cumulative irritation in older and younger skin: a comparison. Acta Derm Venereol 1998;78:279-283.
30. Robinson MK. Population differences in acute skin irritation responses. Race, sex, age, sensitive skin and repeat subject comparisons. Contact Derm 2002;46:86-93.
31. Bowman JP, Kligman AM, Stoudemayer T, Nicholson J. Effects of age on human cumulative irritation responses. J Cosmet Sci 2005;56:213-218.
32. Marrakchi S, Maibach HI. Sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritation in the human face: regional and age-related differences. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2006;19:177-180.
33. Marrakchi S, Maibach HI. Functional map and age-related differences in the human face: nonimmunologic contact urticaria induced by hexyl nicotinate. Contact Derm 2006;55:15-19.
34. Roskos KV, Maibach HI. Percutaneous absorption and age. Implications for therapy. Drugs Aging 1992;2:432-449.
35. Epstein E. Contact dermatitis in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 1971;18:839-852.
36. Peters L, Marriott M, Mukerji B, Indra P, Iyer JV, Roy A et al. The effect of population diversity on skin irritation. Contact Derm 2006;55:357-363.
37. Wesley NO, Maibach HI. Racial (ethnic) differences in skin properties: the objective data. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003;4: 843-860.