Dutch spatial planning policies in transition

Planning Theory and Practice

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 336-341

  Gerrits, Lasse ^a   Rauws, Ward ^b   de Roo, Gert ^b  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANNING PRACTICE; POLICY MAKING; SPATIAL PLANNING;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84862027141     PISSN: 14649357     EISSN: 1470000X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2012.669992     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Alterman, R. 1997. The challenge of farmland preservation: Lessons from a six nation comparison. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63: 220-243.
2. Boelens, L. 2009. The Urban Connection: An Actor-Relational Approach to Urban Planning, Rotterdam, 010.
3. de Roo, G. 2003. Environmental Planning in the Netherlands Too Good to be True- From Command-and-Control Planning to Shared Governance, Aldershot: Ashgate.
4. de Roo, G. and Porter, G. 2007. Fuzzy Planning- The Role of Actors in a Fuzzy Governance Environment, Aldershot: Ashgate.
5. de Roo, G. and Rauws, W.S. 2012. "Positioning planning in the world of order, chaos and complexity on perspectives, behaviour and interventions in a non-linear environment". In Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age. An Overview with Implications for Urban Planning and Design, Edited by: Portugali, J., Meyer, H. and Stolk, E. Berlin: Springer.
6. de Roo, G. and Schwartz, M. 2001. "Inleiding "Omgevingsplanning naar de volgende ronde" [Introduction: Comprehensive planning to the next level]". In Omgevingsplanning, een innovatief proces; Over integratie, participatie, omgevingsplannen en de gebiedsgerichte aanpak, [Comprehensive Planning, an Innovative Process; About Integration, Participation, Comprehensive Plans and the Area-Oriented Approach] Edited by: de Roo, G. and Schwartz, M. The Hague: Sdu Uitgevers.
7. D'Hondt, F. 2002. Discourse at work in the planning of the Benelux countries. Planning Theory & Practice, 3: 361-363.
8. Faludi, A. 1987. A Decision-Centered View of Environmental Planning, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
9. Faludi, A. and van de Valk, A. 1994. Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
10. Faludi, A. 2010. Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation; European Spatial Planning Coming of Age?, London: Routledge.
11. Fifth National Policy Paper on spatial development. 2000. Ruimte Maken, Ruimte Delen. Vijfde Nota over de Ruimtelijke Ordening, Den Haag: Ministerie van VROM.
12. e Eeuw, Den Haag: Interprovinciaal Overleg.
13. Hajer, M. and Zonneveld, W. 2000. Spatial planning in the network society-Rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 8: 337-355.
14. Haartsen, T. and Venhorst, V. 2010. Planning for decline: Anticipating on population decline in the Netherlands. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 101: 218-228.
15. Hajer, M.A. and Wagenaar, H. 2003. "Introduction". In Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society, Edited by: Hajer, M.A. and Wagenaar, H. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hall, P. 1997. The future of the metropolis and its forms. Regional Studies, 31: 211-220.
17. Hooimeijer, P., Kroon, H. and Luttik, J. 2001. Kwaliteit in meervoud. Conceptualisering en operationalisering van ruimtelijke kwaliteit voor meervoudig ruimtegebruik, [Quality in Plural. Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Spatial Quality for Multifunctional Land Use] Gouda: Habiforum.
18. Janssen-Jansen, L.B. and Woltjer, J. 2010. British discretion in Dutch planning: Establishing a comparative perspective for regional and local development in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Land Use Policy, 27: 906-916.
19. Koomen, E., Dekkers, J. and Van Dijk, T. 2008. Effectiveness of open space preservation: Assessment by comparison of planning regimes within the Netherlands. Land Use Policy, 25: 361-377.
20. MEZ. 2004. Pieken in de Delta, Den Haag: Ministerie van Economische Zaken.
21. Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu [Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, or MIenM]. 2011. Eenvoudig Beter. Beleidsbrief aan het Parlement no. 2011047517
22. MVROM. 2005. Nota Ruimte. Ruimte voor ontwikkeling, Den Haag: Ministerie van VROM.
23. Mori, H. 1998. Land Conversion at the Urban Fringe. Urban Studies, 35(9): 1541-1558.
24. Priemus, H. 2007. System innovation in spatial development: Current Dutch approaches. European Planning Studies, 15: 991-1006.
25. Regeerakkoord. 2010. Vrijheid en Verantwoordelijkheid. Regeerakkoord VVD-CDA, Den Haag: VVD-CDA. [Freedom and Responsibility. Coalition Agreement VVD-CDA]
26. Tielrooij, F. 2001. Van Ordenen naar Ontwikkelen. Provincies investeren in de kwaliteit van de ruimte, Den Haag: Interprovinciaal Overleg. [From Structuring to Developing: Provincial Plan for Investments Promoting Spatial Quality]
27. van der Cammen, H. and de Klerk, L. 2003. Ruimtelijke Ordening. Van Grachtengordel tot Vinex-wijk, Houten: Het Spectrum.
28. van Rij, E., Dekkers, J. and Koomen, E. 2008. Analysing the success of open space preservation in the Netherlands: the Midden-Delfland case. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 99: 115-124.
29. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor Regeringsbeleid.(1998) Ruimtelijke Ontwikkelingspolitiek [Spatial Development Policy]. Rapport aan de regering no 53. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers.
30. Woltjer, J. 2000. Consensus Planning: The Relevance of Communicative Planning Theory in Dutch Infrastructure Development, Aldershot: Ashgate.
31. Zeeuw, F. de. 2007. De engel uit het marmer. Reflecties op gebiedsontwikkeling [The Angel of Marble, Reflections on Area-Oriented Development] Delft: Delft University of Technology.
32. Zonneveld, W. 2005a. The Europeanization of Dutch national spatial planning: An uphill battle. DisP, 163: 4-15.
33. Zonneveld, W. 2005b. In search of conceptual modernization: The new Dutch "spatial planning strategy". Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 20: 425-443.