REDD reckoning: A review of research on a rapidly moving target

CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources

Volumn 7, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Seymour, F ^a  

^a CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Climate change; Deforestation; REDD

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862018955     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17498848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20127032     Document Type: Review

References (124)

1. UNFCCC. The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2010. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. Technical paper: FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Conference of the Parties; Cancun; 2010. Available from: URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf#page=2
2. *. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Conference of the Parties; Bali, 2007. Available from URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/cop13/eng/06a01.pdf
3. UNFCCC. Copenhagen Accord. Technical Paper FCCC/CP/2009/L.7. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Conference of the Parties; Copenhagen, 2009. Available from: URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/ cop15/eng/I07.pdf
4. Santilli M, Moutinho P, Schwartzman S, Nepstad D, Curran L, Nobre C. Tropical deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol. Climatic Change 2005;71:267-76. (Pubitemid 41298111)
5. Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change: the Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 2007.
6. Chomitz KM. At Loggerheads? Agricultural Expansion, Poverty Reduction, and Environment in the Tropical Forests. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA; 2007.
7. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Synthesis report: summary for policy makers. In: IPCC fourth assessment report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 2007.
8. Kanninen M, Murdiyarso D, Seymour F, Angelsen A, Wunder S, German L, et al. Do Trees Grow on Money? The Implications of Deforestation Research for Policies to Promote REDD. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; 2007.
9. Angelsen A, Brockhaus M, Kanninen M, Sills E, Sunderlin WD, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S (editors). Realising REDD +: National Strategy and Policy Options. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; 2009.
10. Harzing AW. Publish or perish. 2011. Version 3.3.4291, 2011.05.12.1711U. Available from: URL: www.harzing.com/pop. htm [Accessed 2011 29 July].
11. Alvarado L X R, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S. Why are we seeing 'REDD'? An analysis of the International Debate on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in Developing Countries. Institut du developpement durable et des relations internationales (IDDRI), Paris; 2007.
12. Parker C, Mitchell A, Trivedi M, Mardas M. The Little REDD + Book. Global Canopy Program, Oxford, UK; 2009.
13. Angelsen A (editor). Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; 2008.
14. Meridian Institute. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD): an options assessment report. Prepared for the Government of Norway, by Angelsen A, Brown B, Loisel C, Peskett L, Streck C, Zarin D; 2009. Available from: URL: http://www. REDD-OAR.org
15. Kindermann G, Obersteiner M, Sohngen B, Sathaye J, Andrasko K, Ramtsteiner E, et al. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2008;105(30):10302-7.
16. Strassburg B B N, Kelly A, Balmford A, Davies RG, Gibbs HK, Lovett A, et al. Global congruence of carbon storage and biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems. Conservation Letters 2010;3(2):98-105.
17. IWG-IFR. Report of the Informal Working Group on Interim Finance for REDD+ (IWG-IFR). Discussion Document. Informal Working Group on the Interim Finance for REDD, Helsinki, Finland; 2009. Available from: URL: www.unredd.net/index.php?option=com-docman&task=doc-details&gid= 1096&Itemid=53
18. Neeff T, Ascui F. Lessons from carbon markets for designing an effective REDD architecture. Climate Policy 2009;9(3):306-15.
19. Eliasch J. Climate Change: Financing Global Forests: the Eliasch Review. Earthscan, London, UK; 2008.
20. Lubowski R. What are the costs and potentials of REDD? In: Angelsen A, editor. Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; 2008. p. 23-30.
21. Corbera E, Estrada M, Brown K. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries: revisiting the assumptions. Climatic Change 2010;100(3):355-88.
22. Bellassen V, Gitz V. Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation in Cameroon - assessing costs and benefits. Ecological Economics 2008;68:336-44.
23. Karsenty A. The architecture of proposed REDD schemes after Bali: facing critical choices. International Forestry Review 2008;10(3):443-57.
24. Gregersen H, Lakany HE, Karsenty A, White A. Does the Opportunity Cost Approach Indicate the Real Cost of REDD +? Right and Resources Initiative, Washington, DC; 2010. Available from: URL: http://www.rightsandresources.org/ publication-details.php?publicationID = 1555
25. Ghazoul J, Butler RA, Mateo-Vega J, Koh, LP. REDD: a reckoning of environment and development implications. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2010;25(7):396-402.
26. Thomas S, Dargusch P, Harrison S, Herbohn J. Why are there so few afforestation and reforestation Clean Development Mechanism projects? Land Use Policy 2010;27(3):880-7.
27. Borner J, Wunder S. Paying for avoided deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: from cost assessment to scheme design. International Forestry Review 2008;10(Pt 3):496-511.
28. Wunder S. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology 2007;21(1):48-58.
29. Wunder S, Alban M. Decentralized payments for environmental services: the cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecological Economics 2008;65(4):685-98.
30. Isenberg J, Potvin C. Financing REDD in developing countries: a supply and demand analysis. Climate Policy 2010;10(3):216-31.
31. Angelsen A. REDD models and baselines. International Forestry Review 2008;10(3):465-75.
32. Morales A. Forest Carbon Market Faces Bolivian Barrier at Talks. Bloomberg News (Online). Dec. 6, 2010 11:26 PM GMT+ 0700. Article available at URL: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-06/forest-carbonmarketfaces-bolivian- barrier-at-un-climate-protectiontalks. html
33. Ebeling J, Yasue M. Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society 2008;363:1917-24. (Pubitemid 351482532)
34. Pedroni L, Streck C, Estrada M, Dutschke M. The 'Nested Approach': a Flexible Mechanism to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica; 2007.
35. Butler RA, Pin Koh L, Ghazoul J. REDD in the red: palm oil could undermine carbon payment schemes. Conservation Letters 2009;2(2):67-73.
36. Letter of Intent between the Government of the Kingdom of Norway and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia on 'Cooperation on reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation' [international agreement] 2010 May 26. Available from: URL: http://www.norway.orid/PageFiles/ 404362/Letterofintent-Norwayindonesia-26-May-2010.pdf
37. Government of Norway. Agreement on financing and quick-start measures to protect rainforest [press release] 2010 May 27. Available from: URL: http://www.regjeringen. no/en/sub/Portal-Oslo-Climate-and-Forest-Conference. html?id = 600140
38. Dutschke M, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, Peskett L, Luttrell C, Streck C, Brown J. How do we match country needs with financing sources? In: Angelsen A, editor. Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; 2008. p. 41-52.
39. Johns T, Merry F, Stickler C, Nepstad D, Laporte N, Goetz S. A three-fund approach to incorporating government, public and private forest stewards into a REDD funding mechanism. International Forestry Review 2008;10(Pt 3):458-64.
40. Skutsch M, McCall MK, Lovett JC. Carbon emissions: dry forests may be easier to manage. Nature 2009;462(Pt 7273):567.
41. Angelsen A. How do we set the reference levels for REDD payments? In: Angelsen A, editor. Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; 2008. p. 53-63.
42. Busch J, Strassburg B, Catteneo A, Lubowski R, Bruner A, Rice R, et al. Comparing climate and cost impacts of reference levels for reducing emissions from deforestation. Environmental Research Letters [online serial] 2009;4:044006. Available from: URL: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/4/4/ 044006
43. Catteneo A, Lubowski R, Busch J, Creed A, Strassburg B, Boltz F, et al. On international equity in reducing emissions from deforestation. Environmental Science and Policy 2010;13(8):742-53.
44. Griscom B, Shoch S, Stanley B, Cortez R, Virgilio N. Sensitivity of amounts and distribution of tropical carbon credits depending on baseline rules. Environmental Science and Policy 2009;12:897-911.
45. De Fries RS, Asner G, Achard F, Justice C, Laporte N, Price K, et al. Monitoring tropical deforestation for emerging carbon markets. In: Moutinho P, Schwartzman S, editors. Tropical Deforestation and Climate Change. IPAM and Environmental Defense, Belem, Brazil; 2005. p. 35-44.
46. Herold M, Johns T. Linking requirements with capabilities for deforestation monitoring in the context of the UNFCCCREDD process. Environmental Research Letters [online serial] 2010;2:045025. Available from: URL: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/2/4/045025
47. Olander LP, Gibbs HK, Steininger M, Swenson JJ, Murray BC. Reference scenarios for deforestation and forest degradation in support of REDD: a review of data and methods. Environmental Research Letters [online serial] 2008;3:025011. Available from: URL: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/3/2/ 025011
48. Achard F, Belward AS, Eva HD, Federici S, Mollicone D, Raes F. Accounting for Avoided Conversion of Intact and Non-Intact Forests. Technical options and a proposal for a policy tool. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Brussels, Belgium; 2005.
49. Schlamadinger B, Ciccarese L, Dutschke M, Fearnside P M N, Brown S, Murdiyarso D, et al. Should we include avoidance of deforestation in the international response to climate change? In: Moutinho P, Schwartzman S, editors. Tropical Deforestation and Climate Change. IPAM and Environmental Defense, Belem, Brazil; 2005.
50. Motel PC, Pirard R, Combes JL. A methodology to estimate impacts of domestic policies on deforestation: compensated successful efforts for 'avoided deforestation' (REDD). Ecological Economics 2009;68(3):680-91.
51. Gumpenberger M, Vohland K, Heyder U, Poulter B, Macey K, Rammig A, et al. Predicting pan-tropical climate change induced forest stock gains and losses-implications for REDD. Environmental Research Letters [online serial] 2010;5:014013. Available from: URL: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/5/1/ 014013
52. Pedroni L, Dutschke M, Streck C, Porrua ME. Creating incentives for avoiding further deforestation: the nested approach. Climate Policy 2009;9(2):207-20.
53. Angelsen A, Streck C, Peskett L, Brown J, Luttrell C. What is the right scale for REDD? In: Angelsen A, editor. Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; 2008. p. 31-40.
54. Virgilio NR, Marshall S, Zerbock O, Holmes C, Fishbein G, Cortez R, et al. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD): A Casebook of On-the-Ground Experience. The Nature Conservancy, Conservation International and Wildlife Conservation Society, Arlington, Virginia; 2010.
55. Arlington V, Brown C, Brown E, Brown K. Building institutions to trade ecosystem services: marketing forest carbon in Mexico. World Development 2008;36(10):1956-79.
56. Putz FE, Zuidema PA, Pinard MA, Boot R G A, Sayer JA, Sheil D, et al. Improved tropical forest management for carbon retention. PLoS Biol 6(7):e166. [serial online]. 2008. Available from: URL: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/ info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0060166
57. Peskett L, Harkin L. Risk and Responsibility in REDD. Forestry Briefing 15. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK; 2007.
58. Singh PP. Exploring biodiversity and climate change benefits of community-based forest management. Global Environmental Change 2008;18(3):468-78.
59. Phelps J, Webb EL, Agrawal A. Land use: does REDD plus threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science 2010;328(5976):312-3.
60. Grainger A. Towards a new global forest science. International Forestry Review 2009;11(1):126-33.
61. Hare W, Stockwell C, Flachsland C, Oberthur S. The architecture of the global climate regime: a top-down perspective. Climate Policy 2010;10:600-14.
62. Ostrom E. Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales? Economic Theory 2010;49(2):353-369. Online first. DOI: 10.1007/s00199-010-0558- 6.
63. Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Veaseardo DJ, Dokken DJ (editors). Land use, Land-use Change, and Forestry: a Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 2000.
64. Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Krug T, Kruger D, Pipatti R, et al. (editors). Good practice guidance on land use, landuse change and forestry, prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Japan; 2003. Available from: URL: http://www.ipcc-nggip. iges.or.jp/public/gpglulucf/gpglulucf.html
65. Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (editors). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines (IPCC) for national greenhouse gas inventories. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Japan; 2006. Available from: URL: http://www.ipcc-nggip. iges.or.jp/public/2006g1/index.html
66. Burgess ND, Bahane B, Clairs T, Danielsen F, Dalsgaard S, Funder M, et al. Getting ready for REDD+ in Tanzania: a case study of progress and challenges. Flora and Fauna International 2010;44(3):339-51.
67. Gibbs HK, Brown S, Niles JO, Foley JA. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality. Environmental Research Letters [online serial] 2007;2:045023. Available from: URL: http://iopscience.iop.org/ 1748-9326/2/4/045023
68. GOFC-GOLD. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in Developing Countries: a Sourcebook of Methods and Procedures for Monitoring, Measuring and Reporting. GOFC-GOLD Project Office, Natural Resources, Alberta, Canada; 2009.
69. Asner GP, Powell G V N, Mascaro J, Knapp DE, Clark JK, Jacobson J, et al. High-resolution forest carbon stocks and emissions in the Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2010;107(38):16738-42.
70. Andersson K, Evans TP, Richards KR. National forest carbon inventories: policy needs and assessment capacity. Climatic Change 2009;93(1-2):69-101.
71. Grassi G, Monni S, Federici S, Achard F, Mollicone D. Applying the conservativeness principle to REDD to deal with the uncertainties of the estimates. Environmental Research Letters [online serial] 2008;3:035005. Available from: URL: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/3/3/035005
72. Asner GP. Tropical forest carbon assessment: integrating satellite and airborne mapping approaches. Environmental Research Letters 2009;4:034009. Available from: URL: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/4/3/034009
73. Asner GP, Rudel TK, Aide TM, Defries R, Emerson R. A Contemporary Assessment of Change in Humid Tropical Forests Una EvaluaciOn. Conservation Biology 2009;23(Pt 6):1386-95.
74. DeFries R, Achard F, Brown S, Herold M, Murdiyarso D, Schlamadinger B, et al. Earth observations for estimating greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation in developing countries. Environmental Science and Policy 2007;10:385-94. (Pubitemid 46830335)
75. Herold M, Skutsch MM. Measurement, reporting and verification for REDD +: objectives, capacities and institutions. In: Angelsen A, Brockhaus M, Kanninen M, Sills E, Sunderlin WD, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, editors. Realising REDD +: National Strategy and Policy Options. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; 2009. p. 85-100.
76. Hoare A, Legge T, Nussbaum R, Saunders J. Estimating the Cost of Building Capacity in Rainforest Nations to Allow them to Participate in a Global REDD Mechanism. Chatham House and ProForest, London, UK; 2008. http://www.occ.gov. uk/activities/eliasch/Chatham-House-cost-of-building-capacity.pdf
77. Karky BS, Skutsch M. The cost of carbon abatement through community forest management in Nepal Himalaya. Ecological Economics 2010;69(3):666-72.
78. Baker DJ, Richards G, Grainger A, Gonzalez P, Brown S, De Fries R, et al. Achieving forest carbon information with higher certainty: a five-part plan. Environmental Science and Policy 2010;13(3):249-60.
79. Phelps J, Guerrero MC, Dalabajan DA, Young B, Webb EL. What makes a 'REDD' country? Global Environmental Change 2010;20(2):322-32.
80. Melick D. Credibility of REDD and experiences from Papua New Guinea. Conservation Biology 2010;24(2):359-61.
81. Blom B, Sunderland T, Murdiyarso D. Getting REDD to work locally: lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects. Environmental Science and Policy 2010;13(2):164-72.
82. Sunderlin WD, Atmadja S. Is REDD+ an idea whose time has come, or gone? In: Angelsen A, Brockhaus M, Kanninen M, Sills E, Sunderlin WD, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, editors. Realising REDD +: National Strategy and Policy Options. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; 2009. p. 45-53.
83. Levin K, McDermott C, Cashore B. The climate regime as global forest governance: can reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) initiatives pass a 'dual effectiveness' test? International Forestry Review 2008;10(3):538-49.
84. Aragao L E O C, Shimabukuro YE. The incidence of fire in Amazonian forests with implications for REDD. Science 2010;328(5983):1275-8.
85. Soares-Filho B, Moutinho P, Nepstad D, Anderson A, Rodrigues H, Garcia R, et al. Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences USA 2010;107(24):10821-26.
86. Scharlemann J P W, Kapos V, Campbell A, Lysenko I, Burgess ND, Hansen MC, et al. Securing tropical forest carbon: the contribution of protected areas to REDD. Oryx 2010;44(3):352-7.
87. De Fries R, Rosenzweig C. Toward a whole-landscape approach for sustainable land use in the tropics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2010;107(46):19627-32.
88. Angelsen A. Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2010;107(46):19639-44.
89. Murdiyarso D, Hergoualch K, Verchot LV. Opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in tropical peatlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2010;107(46):19655-60.
90. Palm CA, Smukler SM, Sullivan CC, Mutuo PK, Nyadzi GI, Walsh MG. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2010;107(46):19661-66.
91. West PC, Gibbs HK, Monfreda C, Wagner J, Barford CC, Carpenter SR, et al. Trading carbon for food: Global comparison of carbon stocks vs. crop yields on agricultural land. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences USA 2010;107(46):19645-48.
92. Gibbs HK, Ruesch AS, Achard F, Clayton MK, Holmgren, Ramankutty N, et al. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences USA 2010;107(38):16732-37.
93. Koh LP, Ghazoul J. Spatially explicit scenario analysis for reconciling agricultural expansion, forest protection, and carbon conservation in Indonesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2010;107(24):11140-44.
94. Hansen C, Lund JF, Treue T. Neither fast, nor easy: the prospect of Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) in Ghana. International Forestry Review 2009;11(4):439-55.
95. Barr C, Dermanwan A, Purnomo H, Komarudin H. Financial Governance and Indonesia's Reforestation Fund During the Soeharto and Post-Soeharto Periods, 1989-2009: A Political Economic Analysis of Lessons for REDD+. Occasional Paper 52. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; 2010.
96. Skutsch MM, McCall MK. Reassessing REDD: governance, markets and the hype cycle. Climatic Change 2010;100(3-4):395-402.
97. Umemiya C, Rametsteiner E, Kraxner F. Quantifying the impacts of the quality of governance on deforestation. Environmental Science Policy 2010;13(8):695-701, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.07.002.
98. Vatn A, Angelsen A. Options for a national REDD+ architecture. In: Angelsen A, Brockhaus M, Kanninen M, Sills E, Sunder lin WD, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, editors. Realising REDD +: National Strategy and Policy Options. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; 2009. p. 57-74.
99. Kanninen M, Brockhaus M, Murdiyarso D, Nabuurs GJ. Harnessing forests for climate change mitigation through REDD+. In: Mery G, Katila P, Galloway G, Alfaro RR, Kanninen M, Lobovikov M, et al., editors. Forests and Society - Responding to Global Drivers of Change. IUFRO World Series Volume 25. International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), Vienna, Austria; 2010. p. 43-54.
100. Irawan S, Tacconi L. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD) and decentralized forest management. International Forestry Review 2009;11(4):427-38.
101. Sikor T, Stahl J, Enters T, Ribot JC, Singh N, Sunder lin W, et al. REDD-plus, forest people's rights and nested climate governance. Global Environmental Change 2010;20(3);423-25.
102. The Nature Conservancy. Noel Kempff Mercado Climate Action Project: A Case Study in Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation. The Nature Conservancy, Washington; 2009.
103. Chhatre A, Agrawal A. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2009;106(42):17667-70.
104. Burner J, Wunder S, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, Tito MR, Pereira LS, Nascimento N. Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: scope and equity implications. Ecological Economics 2010;69(6):1272-82.
105. Sunderlin W, Hatcher J, Liddle M. From Exclusion to Ownership? Challenges and Opportunities in Advancing Forest Tenure Reform. Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, DC, USA; 2008.
106. Rands M R W, Adams WM, Bennun L, Butchart S H M, Clements A, Coomes D, et al. Biodiversity conservation: challenges beyond. Science 2010;329(5997):1298- 303.
107. O'Connor D. Governing the global commons: linking carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation in tropical forests. Global Environmental Change 2008;18(3):368-74.
108. Brown D, Seymour F, Peskett L. How do we achieve REDD co-benefits and avoid doing harm? In: Angelsen A, editor. Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; 2008. p. 107-18.
109. Malhi Y, Roberts JT, Betts RA, Killeen TJ, Li W, Nobre CA. Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 2008;319(5860):169- 72.
110. Miles L, Kapos V. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land-use implications. Science 2008;320(5882):1454-5. (Pubitemid 351929392)
111. Harvey CA, Dickson B, Kormos C. Opportunities for achieving biodiversity conservation through REDD. Conservation Letters 2010;3(1):53-61.
112. Putz FE, Redford KH. Dangers of carbon-based conservation. Global Environmental Change 2009;19(4):400-1.
113. Putz FE, Redford KH. The importance of defining 'forest': tropical forest degradation, deforestation, long-term phase shifts, and further transitions. Biotropica 2010;42(1):10-20.
114. Guariguata MR, Nasi R, Kanninen M. Forest degradation: it is not a matter of new definitions. Conservation Letters 2009;2(6):286-7.
115. Edwards DP, Fisher B, Boyd E, Protecting degraded rainforests: enhancement of forest carbon stocks under REDD+. Conservation Letters 2010;3(5):313-6.
116. Venter O, Laurence WF, Iwamura T, Wilson KA, Fuller RA, Possingham HP. Harnessing carbon payments to protect biodiversity. Science 2009;326(5958):1368.
117. Stickler CM, Nepstad DC, Coe MT, McGrath DG, Rodrigues HO, Walker WS, et al. The potential ecological costs and cobenefits of REDD: a critical review and case study from the Amazon region. Global Change Biology 2009;15(12):2803-24.
118. Climate, Community and Biodiversity Alliance (CCBA). Climate, Community & Biodiversity Project Design Standards. 2nd ed. CCBA, Arlington, VA, USA; 2008. Available from: URL: http://www.climate-standards.org/standards/pdf/ccb- standards-second-edition-december-2008.pdf
119. Peskett L, Huberman D, Bowen-Jones E, Edwards G, Brown J. Making REDD Work for the Poor. Poverty Environment Partnership/The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA; 2008.
120. Okereke C, Dooley K. Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoided deforestation: towards a post-Kyoto climate agreement. Global Environmental Change 2010;20(1):82-95.
121. Seymour F. Forests, climate change and human rights: managing risks and trade-offs. In: Humphreys S, editor. Human Rights and Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA; 2010. p. 207-37.
122. Lawlor K, Huberman D. Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) and human rights. In: Campese J, Sunderland T, Greiber T, Oviedo G, editors. Rights-Based Approaches: Exploring Issues and Opportunities for Conservation. Center for International Forestry Research and IUCN, Bogor, Indonesia; 2009. p. 269-85.
123. Seymour F, Angelsen A. Summary and conclusions: REDD wine in old wineskins? In: Angelsen A, Brockhaus M, Kanninen M, Sills E, Sunder lin WD, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, editors. Realising REDD +: National Strategy and Policy Options. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; 2009. p. 293-303.
124. Lewis SL. Carbon emissions: the poorest forest dwellers could suffer. Nature 2009;462(7273):567.