Findkelp, a GIS-based community participation project to assess portuguese kelp conservation status

Journal of Coastal Research

Volumn , Issue SPEC. ISSUE 56, 2009, Pages 1469-1473

  Assis, J ^a   Tavares, D ^a   Tavares, J ^a   Cunha, A ^a   Alberto, F ^a   Serrao E A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALGARVE   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Community participation; GIS; Kelp; Laminaria; Marine conservation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862014216     PISSN: 07490208     EISSN: 15515036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Adl, S. M.; Simpson, A. G. B.; Farmer, M. A.; Andersen, R. A.; Anderson, O. R.; Barta, J. R.; Bowser, S. S.; Brugerolle, G.; Fensome, R. A.; Fredericq, S.; James, T. Y.; Karpov, S.; Kugrens, P.; Krug, J.; Lane, C. E.; Lewis, L. A.; Lodge, J.; Lynn, D. H.; Mann, D. G.; McCourt, R. M.; Mendoza, L.; Moestrup, ø.; Mozley-Standridge, S. E.; Nerad, T. A.; Shearer, C. A.; Smirnov, A. V.; Speigel, F. W. and Taylor, M. F. J. R., 2005. The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 52. 399-451.
2. Aitkin, S. C. and Michel, S., 1995. Who Contrives the "Real' in GIS? Geographic Infromation, Planning, and Critical Theory. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems. 22. 17-29.
3. Araújo, R.; Bárbara, I.; Santos, G.; Rangel, M. and Sousa Pinto, I., 2003. Fragmenta Chorologica Occidentalia, Algae, 8572-8640. (Eds) Vol. 60, pp. 405-409.
4. Ardré, F., 1970. Contribution à l'étude des algues marines du Portugal. I. La flore. Portugalia Acta Biologica sér. B, 10.137-555.
5. Arzel, P., 2000. Revue des causes de variations de l'abondance du champ de Laminaires Pierre Arzel. IFREMER-Technopole de la Pointe du Diable - BP 70 29280 PLOUZANE cedex. pp 10-16.
6. Birkett, D.; Maggs, C.; Dring, M. and Boaden, P., 1998. Infralittoral Reef Biotopes with Kelp Species (volume VII). An overview of dynamic and sensitivity characteristics for conservation management of marine SACs. Scottish Association of Marine Science (UK Marine SACs Project). 174 pages.
7. Bodkin, J. L., 1988. Effects of kelp forest removal on associated fish assemblages in central California. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 117. 227-238.
8. Brown, M. E., 2008. Power, Politics and Remote Sensing. Famine Early Warning Systems and Remote Sensing Data. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 285-295
9. Carletta, J., 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the Kappa statistic. Computational linguistics. 22. 249-254
10. Cohen, J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 20. 37-46.
11. Congalton, R., 1991. A Review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classifications of Remotely Sensed Data. Remote Sensing of Environment 37. 35-46.
12. Craig, W. and Elwood, S., 1998. How and Why Community Groups use Maps and Geographic Information. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25. 95-104.
13. Davies, J., 2001. Marine monitoring handbook. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough
14. Dayton, P. K., 1985. Ecology of kelp communities. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1985. 16.215-15
15. De Mesquita Rodrigues, J. E., 1963. Contribuição para o conhecimento das Phaeophyceae da Costa Portuguesa. Memórias da Sociedade Broteriana 16.5-124.
16. Edwards, S. E. and Estes, J. A., 2006. Catastrophe, recovery and range limitation in NE Pacific kelp forests: a large-scale perspective. Marine ecology progress series. 320. 79-87
17. Evans, K., 2003. Fagatele Bay National Marine Sanctuary video script. American Samoa.
18. Gray, J. S., 1997. Marine biodiversity: patterns, threats and conservation needs. Biodiversity and Conservation 6. 153-175.
19. Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G., 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33. 159-174.
20. Lüning, K., 1990. Seaweeds, their environment, biogeography and ecophysiology. John Wiley & Sons. Inc. 527 pp.
21. Monserud, R. A.; Tchebakova, N. M. and Leemans, R., 1993. Global vegetation change predicted by the modified Budyko model. Climate Change, 25. 59-83.
22. Monserud, R. A. and Leemans, R., 1992. The comparison of global vegetation maps. Ecological Modelling 62. 275-293.
23. Roberts, C. M.; Andelman, S.; Branch, G.; Bustamante, R. H.; Castilla, J. C.; Dugan, J.; Halpern, B. S., Lafferty, K. D.; Leslie, H.; Lubcheco, J.; Mcardle, D.; Possingham, H. P.; Ruckelshaus, M., and Warner, R. R., 2003. Ecological criteria for evaluating candidate sites for marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13. 199-214.
24. Smits, P. C.; DELLEPIANE, S. G. and SCHOWENGERDT, R. A., 1999. Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: a review and a proposal for a cost-based approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 20. 1461-1486
25. Talen, E., 1999. Constructing Neighborhoods from the Bottom Up: the Case for Resident Generated GIS. Environment and Planning Biology 26. 533-554.
26. Tyrrell, M. C., 2004. Strategic plan for mapping Massachusetts' benthic marine habitats. Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management, Boston, MA.
27. Unep. 1992. Protection of the Quality and Supply of Freshwater Resources: Application of Integrated Approaches to the Development, Management and Use of Water Resources. Agenda 21, Chapter 18. United Nations Publications, New York.
28. Ward, T. J., and Vanderklift., M. A., Nicholls, A. O. and Kenchington, R. A., 1999. Selecting marine reserves using habitats and species assemblages as surrogates for biological diversity. Ecological Applications 9. 691-698.
29. Williams, W. D., 2002. Community participation in conserving and managing inland waters. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 12:3. 315-326.