Laparoendoscopic single-site versus traditional laparoscopic surgery in patients with cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 449-455

  Zhong, Xi ^a   Rui, Yuan Yi ^a   Zhou, Zong Guang ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; ESTHETICS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE CHOLECYSTECTOMY; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRADITIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84862012609     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: 15579034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2011.0521     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Reynolds W, et al. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 2001;5:89-94.
2. Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL, Ashley SW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The new 'gold standard'? Arch Surg 2001;127:917-921.
3. Schirmer BD, Edge SB, Jones RS, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Ann Surg 1991;213:665-676.
4. Johansson M, Thune A, Lundell L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 2005;92:44-49. (Pubitemid 40144192)
5. Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, et al. Short note: One wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1997;84:695-697.
6. Huang CK, Tsai JC, Lo CH, et al. Preliminary surgical results of single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic barbaric surgery. Obes Surg 2010;21:391-396.
7. Zorron R, Maggioni LC, Filgueiras M, et al. NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: Preliminary clinical application. Surg Endosc 2008; 22:542-547.
8. Rattner D, Kalloo A; ASGE/SAGES Working Group. ASGE/ SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc 2006;20: 329-333. (Pubitemid 43130273)
9. Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 2008;23:896-899.
10. Ponsky TA, Diluciano J, Boulanger S, et al. Early experience with single port laparoscopic surgery in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19:551-553.
11. Targarona EM, Balague C, Trias M, et al. Single-port access: A feasible alternative to conventional laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Innov 2009;16:348-352.
12. Chow AG, Purkayastha S, Zacharakis E, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right hemicolectomy. Arch Surg 2009;146:183-186.
13. Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH, Dewoolkar AV, et al. Singleincision laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A comprehensive review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2010;6:575-582.
14. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1-12. (Pubitemid 26120810)
15. Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C, et al. Reported methodological quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:982-989. (Pubitemid 33131619)
16. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-560. (Pubitemid 37088507)
17. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, et al. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1842-1848.
18. Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, et al. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2011; [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2028-z.
19. Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2011;98:1695-1702.
20. Aprea G, Coppola Bottazzi E, et al. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized prospective study. J Surg Res 2011;166:e109-e112.
21. Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN, et al. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2011;202:254-258.
22. Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 2011;201:369-372.
23. Lirici MM, Califano AD, Angelini P, Corcione F. Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Results of a pilot randomized trial. Am J Surg 2011;202:45-52.
24. Cuesta MA, Berends F, Veenhof AA, et al. The "invisible cholecystectomy": A transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scar. Surg Endosc 22:1211-1213.
25. Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G, et al. Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2000;14:32-36. (Pubitemid 30036698)
26. Sarli S, Iusco D, Roncoroni L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with miniinstruments. Br J Surg 2009;90:1345-1348.
27. Bucher P, Ostermann S, Pugin F, Morel P. E-NOTES appendectomy versus transvaginal appendectomy: Similar cosmetic results but shorter complete recovery? Surg Endosc 2009;23:916-917.