Low-frequency sonoporation in vitro: Experimental system evaluation

Strojniski Vestnik/Journal of Mechanical Engineering

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 319-326

  Jelenc, Jure ^a   Jelenc, Joẑe ^a   Miklavčič, Damijan ^b   Lebar, Alenka Maček ^b  

^a Iskra Medical doo ^*  (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Cavitation; Finite element model; Hydrophone; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC LINING; CELL MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; CELL SUSPENSION; EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM; EXPOSURE SYSTEM; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; IN-VITRO; LOW FREQUENCY; LOW-FREQUENCY ULTRASOUND; SONOPORATION; TRANSPORT MECHANISM; ULTRASOUND PARAMETERS; ULTRASOUND WAVES; WATER BATHS;

CAVITATION; CELL CULTURE; CELL MEMBRANES; HYDROPHONES; TRANSDUCERS;

ULTRASONICS;

EID: 84861990555     PISSN: 00392480     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5545/sv-jme.2011.172     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Liang, H. D., Tang, J., Halliwell, M. (2010). Sonoporation, drug delivery, and gene therapy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, vol. 224, no. 20, p. 343-361, DOI:10.1243/09544119JEIM565.
2. Karshafian, R., Samac, S., Bevan, P. D., Burns, P. N. (2010). Microbubble mediated sonoporation of cells in suspension: clonogenic viability and influence of molecular size on uptake. Ultrasonics, vol. 50, no. 7, p. 691-697, DOI:10.1016/j.ultras.2010.01.009.
3. Karshafian, R., Bevan, P. D., Burns, P. N., Samac, S., Banerjee, M. (2005). Ultrasound-induced uptake of different size markers in mammalian cells. IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, p. 13-16, DOI:10.1109/ULTSYM.2005.1602785. (Pubitemid 46285365)
4. Leighton, T. G. (1997). The Acoustic Bubble. Academic Press, London.
5. Neppiras, E. A. (1984). Acoustic cavitation series: part one: Acoustic cavitation: an introduction. Ultrasonics, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 25-28, DOI:10.1016/0041-624X (84) 90057-X.
6. Dular, M., Širok, B., Stoffel, B. (2005). The influence of the gas content of water and the flow velocity on cavitation erosion aggressiveness. Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 51, no. 3, p. 132-145. (Pubitemid 40795479)
7. Osterman, A., Dular, M., Širok, B. (2009). Numerical simulation of a near-wall bubble collapse in an ultrasonic field. Journal of Fluid Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 210-221, DOI:10.1299/jfst.4.210.
8. Osterman, A., Dular, M., Hočevar, M., Širok, B. (2010). Infrared thermography of cavitation thermal effects in water. Strojniski vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 56, no. 9, p. 527-534.
9. Prentice, P., Cuschieri, A., Dholakia, K., Prausnitz, M., Campbell, P. (2005). Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation. Nature Physics, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 107-110, DOI:10.1038/nphys148.
10. Krasovitski, B., Frenkel, V., Shoham, S., Kimmel, E. (2011). Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 108, no. 8, p. 3258-3263, DOI:10.1073/pnas.1015771108.
11. Wu, J., Nyborg, W. L. M. (2006). Emerging therapeutic ultrasound. World Scientific, Singapore, DOI:10.1142/9789812774125.
12. Wells, D. J. (2010). Electroporation and ultrasound enhanced non-viral gene delivery in vitro and in vivo. Cell Biology and Toxicology, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 21-28, DOI:10.1007/s10565-009-9144-8.
13. Newman, C. M. H., Bettinger, T. (2007). Gene therapy progress and prospects: ultrasound for gene transfer. I, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 465-475, DOI:10.1038/sj.gt.3302925. (Pubitemid 46390919)
14. Miller, D. L., Pislaru, S. V., Greenleaf, J. E. (2002). Sonoporation: mechanical DNA delivery by ultrasonic cavitation. Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics, vol. 27, no. 1-6, p. 115-134, DOI:10.1023/A:1022983907223. (Pubitemid 36553831)
15. Postema, M., Gilja, O. H. (2007). Ultrasounddirected drug delivery. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 355-361, DOI:10.2174/138920107783018453. (Pubitemid 350268194)
16. Sundaram, J., Mellein, B. R., Mitragotri, S. (2003). An experimental and theoretical analysis of ultrasoundinduced permeabilization of cell membranes. Biophysical Journal, vol. 84, no. 5, p. 3087-3101, DOI:10.1016/S0006-3495 (03) 70034-4. (Pubitemid 36531757)
17. Guzmán, H. R., Nguyen, D. X., Khan, S., Prausnitz, M. R. (2001). Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. I. Quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 110, no. 1, p. 588-596, DOI:10.1121/1.1376131. (Pubitemid 32642595)
18. Guzmán, H. R., Nguyen, D. X., Khan, S., Prausnitz, M. R. (2001). Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. II. Heterogeneous effects on cells. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 110, no. 1, p. 597-606, DOI:10.1121/1.1376130. (Pubitemid 32642596)
19. Keyhani, K., Guzmán, H. R., Parsons, A., Lewis, T. N., Prausnitz, M. R. (2001). Intracellular drug delivery using low-frequency ultrasound: quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability. Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 18, no. 11, p. 1514-1520, DOI:10.1023/A:1013066027759. (Pubitemid 33022405)
20. Wei, W., Zheng-zhong, B., Yong-jie, W., Qing-wu, Z., Ya-lin, M. (2004). Bioeffects of low-frequency ultrasonic gene delivery and safety on cell membrane permeability control. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 23, no. 12, p. 1569-1582. (Pubitemid 39586862)
21. Tachibana, K., Uchida, T., Tamura, K., Eguchi, H., Yamashita, N., Ogawa, K. (2000). Enhanced cytotoxic effect of Ara-C by low intensity ultrasound to HL-60 cells. Cancer Letters, vol. 149, no. 1-2, p. 189-194, DOI:10.1016/S0304- 3835 (99) 00358-4. (Pubitemid 30100575)
22. ter Haar, G., Shaw, A., Pye, S., Ward, B., Bottomley, F., Nolan, R., Coady, A.-M. (2011). Guidance on reporting ultrasound exposure conditions for bio-effects studies. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 177-183, DOI:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.10.021.
23. Pong, M., Umchid, S., Guarino, A. J., Lewin, P. A., Litniewski, J., Nowicki, A., Wrenn, S. P. (2006). In vitro ultrasound-mediated leakage from phospholipid vesicles. Ultrasonics, vol. 45, no. 1-4, p. 133-145, DOI:10.1016/j.ultras.2006.07.021. (Pubitemid 44765060)
24. Kaddur, K., Lebegue, L., Tranquart, F., Midoux, P., Pichon, C., Bouakaz, A. (2010). Transient transmembrane release of green fluorescent proteins with sonoporation. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 57, no. 7, p. 1558-1567, DOI:10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1586.
25. IEC 62127-1 (2007). Ultrasonics - Hydrophones - Part 1: Measurement and characterization of medical ultrasonic fields up to 40 MHz. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
26. Kinoshita, M., Hynynen, K. (2007). Key factors that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: the importance of standing wave in sonoporation. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 359, no. 4, p. 860-865, DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.05.153. (Pubitemid 46946898)
27. Radmanovic, M. D., Mancic, D. D. (2004). Design and modeling of the power ultrasonic transducers, University of Niš, Niš.
28. Moreno, E., Acevedo, P., Fuentes, M., Sotomayor, A., Borroto, L., Villafuerte, M. E., Leija, L. (2005). Design and construction of a bolt-clamped Langevin transducer. International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Proceedings, p. 393-395, DOI:10.1109/ICEEE.2005.1529652. (Pubitemid 44425016)
29. Abboud, N. N., Wojcik, G. L., Vaughan, D. K., Mould, J., Powell, D. J., Nikodym, L. (1998). Finite element modeling for ultrasonic transducers. Proceedings of the SPIE International Symposium on Medical Imaging, p. 19-42. (Pubitemid 35039417)
30. Szabá, B. A., Babuska, I. (1991). Finite element analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
31. Barati, A. H., Mokhtari-Dizaji, M., Mozdarani, H., Bathaie, Z., Hassan, Z. M. (2007). Effect of exposure parameters on cavitation induced by low-level dualfrequency ultrasound. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 783-789, DOI:10.1016/j. ultsonch.2006.12.016. (Pubitemid 46783677)