Validity of a Smartphone-based instrumented Timed Up and Go

Gait and Posture

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 163-165

  Mellone, Sabato ^a   Tacconi, Carlo ^a   Chiari, Lorenzo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Accelerometer; Mobile sensing; Reliability; Smartphone; Timed Up and Go

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COST; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; MOBILIZATION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SITTING; SMARTPHONE; STANDING; TIMED UP AND GO;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; AGED; CELLULAR PHONE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; POSTURAL BALANCE; SAMPLING STUDIES; SENSATION DISORDERS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WALKING;

EID: 84861988499     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: 18792219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Berg K.O., Maki B.E., Williams K.I. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992, 73:1073-1080.
2. Lin M., Hwang H., Hu M., Wu H., Wang Y., Huang F. Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach, and tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004, 52:1343-1348.
3. American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society, and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Panel on Falls Prevention Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001, 49(5):664-672.
4. Weiss A., Herman T., Plotnik M., Brozgol M., Maidan I., Giladi N., et al. Can an accelerometer enhance the utility of the Timed Up & Go Test when evaluating patients with Parkinson's disease?. Med Eng Phys 2010, 32(2):119-125.
5. Zampieri C., Salarian A., Carlson-Kuhta P., Aminian K., Nutt J.G., Horak F.B. The instrumented timed up and go test: potential outcome measure for disease modifying therapies in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010, 81(2):171-176.
6. Marschollek M., Nemitz G., Gietzelt M., Wolf K.H., Meyer Zu Schwabedissen H., Haux R. Predicting in-patient falls in a geriatric clinic: a clinical study combining assessment data and simple sensory gait measurements. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2009, 42(4):317-321.
7. Consolvo S., McDonald D.W., Toscos T., Chen M.Y., Froehlich J., Harrison B., et al. Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of Ubifit garden. Proceedings of the 26th annual SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems 2008, 1797-1806.
8. Lane N.D., Miluzzo E., Lu H., Peebles D., Choudhury T., Campbell A.T. A survey of mobile phone sensing. IEEE Commun Mag 2010, 48(9):140-150.
9. Salarian A., Horak F.B., Zampieri C., Carlson-Kuhta P., Nutt J.G., Aminian K. iTUG, a sensitive and reliable measure of mobility. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010, 18(3):303-310.
10. Moe-Nilssen R., Helbostad J.L. Estimation of gait cycle characteristics by trunk accelerometry. J Biomech 2004, 37(1):121-126.
11. Zijlstra W. Assessment of spatio-temporal parameters during unconstrained walking. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004, 92(1-2):39-44.
12. Moe-Nilssen R., Helbostad J.L. Interstride trunk variability but not step width variability can differentiate between fit and frail older adults. Gait Posture 2005, 21(2):164-170.
13. Hausdorff J.M., Rios D.A., Edelberg H.K. Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: a 1-year prospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001, 82(8):1050-1056.
14. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, i:307-310.
15. Dijkstra B., Kamsma Y., Zijlstra W. Detection of gait and postures using a miniaturised triaxial accelerometer-based system: accuracy in community-dwelling older adults. Age Ageing 2010, 39(2):259-262.