Constructs and Attributes in Test Validity: Reflections on Newton's Account

Measurement

Volumn 10, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 84-87

  Markus, Keith A ^a  

^a JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861978019     PISSN: 15366367     EISSN: 15366359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15366367.2012.677348     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). 1999. Standards for educational and psychological testing, Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Brandom, R. B. 2000. Rorty and his critics, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
3. Gamut, L. T. F. 1991. Logic, language, and meaning, Vol. 1, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Markus, K. A. and Borsboom, D. forthcoming. Frontiers in test validity theory: Measurement, causation, and meaning, New York, NY: Routledge.
5. Newton, P. E. this issue. Clarifying the consensus definition of validity. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 10: 1-29.
6. Ostertag, G. 1998. Definite descriptions: A reader, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Quine, W. V. and Ullian, J. S. 1978. The web of belief, 2nd, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
8. Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.