Product yields and kinetics of pyrolysis of sawdust and bagase particles

Energy Education Science and Technology Part A: Energy Science and Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 419-426

  Kapoor, L ^a   Chaurasia, A S ^a  

^a JAYPEE UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Biomass; Kinetic modeling; Kinetic scheme; Pyrolysis

Indexed keywords

ARRHENIUS CONSTANTS; AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE; BEST VALUE; BIOMASS CONVERSION; BIOMASS MATERIALS; ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS; HIGH ENERGY; KINETIC MODELING; KINETIC SCHEME; KINETICS OF PYROLYSIS; MUFFLE FURNACES; NON-LINEAR REGRESSION; ORGANIC CONTENT; ORGANICS; PRODUCT YIELDS; PYROLYSIS KINETICS; REACTION MODEL; REACTION PARAMETERS; RESIDENCE TIME; TEMPERATURE RANGE; THERMAL DESTRUCTION; TWO-DIMENSIONAL SURFACE;

ACTIVATION ENERGY; BAGASSE; BIOCONVERSION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETIC PARAMETERS; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; PYROLYSIS;

BIOMASS;

EID: 84861965213     PISSN: 1308772X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Prakash N, Karunanithi T. Advances in modeling and simulation of biomass pyrolysis. Asian J Sci Res 2009;2:1-27.
2. th Annual Session of IIChE in association with International Partners (CHEMCON-2007), The Diamond Jubilee Conference of IIChE, Heritage Institute of Technology, Kolkata, 2007;33.
3. Sheth PN, Babu BV. Kinetic modeling of the pyrolysis of biomass. Proceedings of National Conference on Environmental Conservation, BITS-Pilani, India, p 453, 2006.
4. Ertas M, Alma MH. Slow pyrolysis of chinaberry (Melia azedarach L.) seeds: Part I. The influence of pyrolysis parameters on the product yields. Energ Educ Sci Tech-A 2011;26:143-154.
5. Olivella MA, De Las Deras FXC. Evaluation of linear kinetic methods from pyrolysis data of Spanish oil shales and coals. Oil Shale 2008;25:227-245.
6. Sonobe T, Worasuwannarak N. Kinetic analyses of biomass pyrolysis using the distributed activation energy model. Fuel 2008;87:414-421.
7. Babu BV, Chaurasia AS. Modeling, simulation and estimation of optimum parameters in pyrolysis of biomass. Energy Convers Manage 2002;44:2135-2158.
8. Xu B, Kandiyoti R. Two-stage kinetic model of primary coal liquefaction. Energy Fuels 1996;10:1115-1122.
9. Boroson ML, Howard JB, Longwell JP, Peters AW. Products yields and kinetics from the vapor phase cracking of wood pyrolysis tars. AIChE 1989;35:120-128.
10. Diebold JP. The cracking kinetics of depolymerized biomass vapours in a continuous reactor. Thesis T-3007, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 1985.
11. Liden AG, Berruti F, Scott DS. A kinetic model for production of liquids from the fast pyrolysis of biomass. Chem Eng Commun 1988;65:207-221.
12. Demirbas A. Energy issues in energy education. Energ Educ Sci Tech-A 2011;27:209-220.
13. Demirbas B. Sustainable biomass-to-energy business. Energ Educ Sci Tech-A 2011;28:453-458.
14. Konur O. The evaluation of the research on the biofuels: a scientometric approach. Energ Educ Sci Tech-A 2011;28:903-916.
15. Ak A. Waste management: Some energy recovery processes. Ener Educ Sci Technol Part-A 2012;28:1175-1182.
16. Yumurtaci M, Kecebas A. Renewable energy and its university level education in Turkey. Energ Educ Sci Tech-B 2011;3:143-152.
17. Balat M. Challenges and opportunities for large-scale production of biodiesel. Energ Educ Sci Tech-A 2011;27:427-434.
18. Demirbas MF. Decentralization of energy generation in Turkey in the future. Energ Educ Sci Tech-A 2011;28:9-16.
19. Alp D, Cirak B. Biofuels from micro-and macroalgae. Energ Educ Sci Tech-A 2012;28:719-726.