IRB review and public health biobanking: A case study of the Michigan biotrust for health

IRB Ethics and Human Research

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 11-16

  Moncoven, Ann ^a   McGee, Harry ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD STAIN; DRIED BLOOD SPOT TESTING; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; BLOOD STAINS; DRIED BLOOD SPOT TESTING; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFORMED CONSENT; MICHIGAN; NEONATAL SCREENING;

EID: 84861947935     PISSN: 01937758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Beleno v. Lakey, SA-09-CA-188-FB, U. S. District Court, W. D. Texas, 9/17/09, http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/12/10/Baby-Blood.pdf.
2. Michigan Neonatal BioTrust Business Plan (2008), unpublished report on file with the authors;
3. see also Kuras A, Michigan BioTrust for Health spots opportunities for blood research. Research Corridor, December 6, 2011, http://researchcorridor. com/features/michiganneonatalbiobankooo3-aspx.
4. Tarini BA, Goldenberg A, Singer SJ, et al. Not without my permission: Parents' willingness to allow newborn screening samples to be used for research. Public Health Genomics 2010;13:125-130;
5. see also Botkin JR, Rothwell E, Anderson R, et al. Public attitudes regarding the use of residual newborn screening specimens for research. Pediatrics 2012;129(2) 1231-238.
6. Tomlinson T. Protection of non-welfare interests in the research uses of archived biological samples. In Dierick K and Borry P, eds., New Challenges for Biobanks: Ethics, Law, and Governance. Antwerp, the Netherlands: Intersentia, 2009, pp. 99-110.
7. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1979.
8. See Fleck L, Mongoven A, Marzec S, Stored blood spots: Ethical and policy challenges, http://www.ippsr.msu.edu/Publications/HPFleck.pdf.
9. Harmon A. Indian tribe wins right to limit use of its DNA. New York Times, April 21, 2010.
10. Two legal cases, one filed by an individual Havasupai and one by the tribe, became consolidated in multiple layers of court review. Tilousi v. Arizona State Board of Regents; and Havasupai Tribe v. Arizona State University Board of Regents, 204 P.3d 1063 (9th Circuit 2008).
11. Chrysler D, McGee H, Bach J, et al. The Michigan BioTrust for Health: Using dried blood spots for research to benefit the community while respecting the individual. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics Spring 2011;39:98-101.
12. Winickoff DE, Winickoff RN. The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. NEJM 2003;349:1180-1184. (Pubitemid 37122332)