Exposure Gone "Wild": A Call for Rational Exposure Scenarios

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 485-

  Hope, Bruce K ^a  

^a CH2M HILL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861940654     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: 15497860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2012.672878     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Ginsberg, G L and Toal, B F. 2009. Quantitative approach for incorporating methylmercury risks and omega-3 fatty acid benefits in developing species-specific fish consumption advice. Environ Health Perspect, 117(2): 267-75.
2. Hope, BK. 2009. Will there ever be a role for risk assessments?. Hum Ecol Risk Assess, 15(1): 1-6.
3. NRC (National Research Council). 1994. "Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment". Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press.
4. Stone, D and Hope, B K. 2010. Carcinogenic risk as the basis for fish advisories: A critique. Integrated Environ Assess Manage, 6(1): 180-3.
5. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2003. "Example Exposure Scenarios. EPA/600/R-03/036". Washington, DC, USA: National Center for Environmental Assessment.