Authorship trends over the past fifty years in the Journal of the Danish Medical Association (Danish: Ugeskrift for Læger)

Danish Medical Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Vinther, Siri ^a   Rosenberg, Jacob ^a  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHOR; BIOMEDICAL DISCIPLINES, SCIENCE AND ART; HUMAN; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; WRITING; ARTICLE; DENMARK; HISTORY; LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PUBLICATION;

AUTHORSHIP; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DENMARK; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMANS; MANUSCRIPTS, MEDICAL; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 84861938304     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22451919     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. ICMJE. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. www.icmje.org/ethical_1author (21 Oct 2011).
2. Baethge C. Publish together or perish. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008;105:380-3.
3. Wager E. Recognition, reward and responsibility: Why the authorship of scientific papers matters. Maturitas 2009;62:109-12.
4. Weeks WB, Wallace AE, Kimberly BCS. Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious US medical journals. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:1949-54.
5. Levsky ME, Rosin A, Coon TP et al. A descriptive analysis of authorship within medical journals, 1995-2005. South Med J 2007;100:371-5.
6. Regalado A. Scientific publishing-multiauthor papers on the rise. Science 1995;268:25.
7. Gusto I. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993;329:673-82.
8. Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 2007;316:1036-9.
9. Aad G, Abat E, Abdallah J et al. The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. J Instrum 2008;3:S08003
10. Cronin B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2001;52:558-69.
11. Claxton LD. Scientific authorship Part 1. A window into scientific fraud? Mutat Res 2005;589:17-30.
12. Claxton LD. Scientific authorship Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Mutat Res 2005;589:31-45.
13. Committee On Publication Ethics. Guidelines. www.publicationethics.org/ resources/guidelines (21 Oct 2011).
14. Council of Science Editors. CSE's White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications. www.councilscienceeditors.org/i4a/pages/ index.cfm?pageid=3313 (21 Oct 2011).
15. European Medical Writers Association. European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications. www.emwa.org/Mum/ EMWAguidelines.pdf (21 Oct 2011).
16. National Committee of Health Research. Clinical research in Denmark-time for action. www.biopeople.dk/fileadmin/filer/Per/report_2009_ clinical.pdf (21 Oct 2011).
17. Rennie D, Flanagin A, Yank V. The contributions of authors. JAMA 2000;284:89-91.
18. Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L. When authorship fails-a proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA 1997;278:579-85.
19. Bates T, Anic A, Marusic M et al. Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions-comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms. JAMA 2004;292:86-8.
20. Ivanis A, Hren D, Sambunjak D et al. Quantification of authors' contributions and eligibility for authorship: Randomized study in a general medical journal. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:1303-10.