Correlation between radiographic measures of acetabular morphology with 3D femoral head coverage in patients with acetabular retroversion

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 233-239

  Hansen, Benjamin J ^a   Harris, Michael D ^a,b   Anderson, Lucas A ^a   Peters, Christopher L ^a   Weiss, Jeffrey A ^a,b   Anderson, Andrew E ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of Utah   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ACETABULUM RETROVERSION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE RETROVERSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMUR HEAD; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MEASUREMENT; MORPHOLOGY; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIODIAGNOSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VOLUMETRY;

ACETABULUM; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMUR HEAD; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84861913625     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2012.684138     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson A E, Peters C L, Tuttle B D, et al. Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies. J Biomech Eng 2005; 127 (3): 364-73.
2. Banks K P, Grayson D E. Acetabular retroversion as a rare cause of chronic hip pain: recognition of the "figure-eight" sign. Skeletal Radiol (Suppl 1) 2007; 36: S108-11.
3. Bardakos N V, Villar R N. Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91 (2): 162-9.
4. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, et al. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87 (7): 1012-8.
5. Clohisy J C, Carlisle J C, Trousdale R, et al. Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop 2009; (467) (3): 666-75. (Evaluation Studies Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural)
6. Dandachli W, Kannan V, Richards R, et al. Analysis of cover of the femoral head in normal and dysplastic hips: new CT-based technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90 (11): 1428-34.
7. Dandachli W, Islam S U, Liu M, et al. Three-dimensional CT analysis to determine acetabular retroversion and the implications for the management of femoro-acetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91 (8): 1031-6.
8. Ezoe M, Naito M, Inoue T. The prevalence of acetabular retroversion among various disorders of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2006; 88 (2): 372-9.
9. Fujii M, Nakashima Y, Yamamoto T, et al. Acetabular retroversion in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2010; 92 (4): 895-903.
10. Giori N J, Trousdale R T. Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop 2003; (417): 263-9.
11. Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Lund B, et al. Pelvic orientation and assessment of hip dysplasia in adults. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75 (6): 721-9.
12. Jamali A A, Mladenov K, Meyer D C, et al. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the "cross-oversign". J Orthop Res 2007; 25 (6): 758-65.
13. Klaue K, Wallin A, Ganz R. CT evaluation of coverage and congruency of the hip prior to osteotomy. Clin Orthop 1988; (232): 15-25.
14. Landis J R, Koch G G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33 (1): 159-74.
15. Li P L, Ganz R. Morphologic features of congenital acetabular dysplasia: one in six is retroverted. Clin Orthop 2003; (416): 245-53.
16. Mast J W, Brunner R L, Zebrack J. Recognizing acetabular version in the radiographic presentation of hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop 2004; (418): 48-53.
17. Perreira A C, Hunter J C, Laird T, et al. Multilevel measurement of acetabular version using 3-D CT-generated models: implications for hip preservation surgery. Clin Orthop 2011; (469) (2): 552-61.
18. Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999; 81 (2): 281-8.
19. Sharp I K. Acetabular dysplasia-the acetabular angle. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1961; 43: 268-72.
20. Siebenrock K A, Kalbermatten D F, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop 2003a; (407): 241-8.
21. Siebenrock K A, Schoeniger R, Ganz R. Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003b; 85 (2): 278-86.
22. Steppacher S D, Tannast M, Werlen S, et al. Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage. Clin Orthop 2008; 466 (4): 782-90.
23. Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, et al. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop 2005; (438): 182-90.
24. Tannast M, Siebenrock K A, Anderson S E. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis-what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188 (6): 1540-52.
25. Tannast M, Goricki D, Beck M, et al. Hip damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop 2008; (466) (2): 273-80.
26. Tönnis D. Congenital dysplasia and dislocation of the hip. 1st ed. Springer- Verlag 1987.
27. Werner C M, Copeland C E, Ruckstuhl T, et al. Prevalence of acetabular dome retroversion in a mixed race adult trauma patient population. Acta Orthop Belg 2008; 74 (6): 766-72.
28. Werner C M, Copeland C E, Ruckstuhl T, et al. Radiographic markers of acetabular retroversion: correlation of the cross-over sign, ischial spine sign and posterior wall sign. Acta Orthop Belg 2010; 76 (2): 166-73.
29. Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint with special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand 1953; 83: 1-135.
30. Zheng G, Tannast M, Anderegg C, et al. Hip2Norm: an object-oriented crossplatform program for 3D analysis of hip joint morphology using 2D pelvic radiographs. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2007; 87 (1): 36-45.