Electronic health record technology [2]

JAMA

Volumn 307, Issue 21, 2012, Pages 2255-2256

  Cresswell, Kathrin ^a   Sheikh, Aziz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INVESTMENT; LETTER; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM; HUMAN; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NOTE; TECHNOLOGY; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 84861864699     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Wang CJ, Huang AT. Integrating technology into health care: what will it take? JAMA. 2012;307(6):569-570.
2. Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000387.
3. Sheikh A, Cornford T, Barber N, et al. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: final qualitative results from prospective national evaluation in "early adopter" hospitals. BMJ. 2011;343:d6054.
4. Avery AJ, Rodgers S, Cantrill JA, et al. A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2012;379(9823):1310-1319.
5. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Vinogradova Y, et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2. BMJ. 2008;336(7659):1475-1482. (Pubitemid 351977019)