Age-related changes in the use of regular patterns for auditory scene analysis

Hearing Research

Volumn 289, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 98-107

  Rimmele, Johanna ^a   Schröger, Erich ^a   Bendixen, Alexandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY SCENE ANALYSIS; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND INTENSITY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; TIME FACTORS; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861842032     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alain C., Woods D.L. Age-related changes in processing auditory stimuli during visual attention: evidence for deficits in inhibitory control and sensory memory. Psychol. Aging 1999, 14:507-519.
2. Alain C., Andre A., Woods D.L. Separate memory-related processing for auditory frequency and patterns. Psychophysiology 1999, 36:737-744.
3. Alain C., Dyson B.J., Snyder J.S. Aging and the perceptual organization of sounds: a change of scene?. Handbook of Models for Human Aging 2006, 759-770. Academic Press, New York. P.M. Conn (Ed.).
4. Alain C., McDonald K.L., Ostroff J.M., Schneider B. Aging: a switch from automatic to controlled processing of sounds?. Psychol. Aging 2004, 19:125-133.
5. Andreou L.-V., Kashino M., Chait M. The role of temporal regularity in auditory segregation. Hear. Res. 2011, Advance online publication. 10.1016/j.heares.2011.06.001.
6. Bendixen, A., Böhm, T.M., Szalárdy, O., Mill, R., Denham, S.L., Winkler, I. Different roles of similarity and predictability in auditory stream segregation. Learn. Percept., in press.
7. Bendixen A., Denham S.L., Gyimesi K., Winkler I. Regular patterns stabilize auditory streams. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2010, 128:3658-3666.
8. Bertoli S., Smurzynski J., Probst R. Temporal resolution in young and elderly subjects as measured by mismatch negativity and a psychoacoustic gap detection task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 113:396-406.
9. Best V., Mason C.R., Kidd J.G. Spatial release from masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners as a function of the temporal overlap of competing talkers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011, 129:1616-1625.
10. Boh B., Herholz S.C., Lappe C., Pantev C. Processing of complex auditory patterns in musicians and nonmusicians. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e21458.
11. Bregman A. Auditory Scene Analysis: the Perceptual Organization of Sound 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts).
12. Denham S.L., Winkler I. The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams. J. Physiol. Paris 2006, 100:154-170.
13. Devergie A., Grimault N., Tillmann B., Berthommier F. Effect of rhythmic attention on the segregation of interleaved melodies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2010, 128:EL1-EL7.
14. Eagleman D.M., Tse P.U., Buonomano D., Janssen P., Nobre A.C., Holcombe A.O. Time and the brain: how subjective time relates to neural time. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:10369-10371.
15. Fitzgibbons P.J., Gordon-Salant S. Age effects in discrimination of repeating sequence intervals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011, 129:1490-1500.
16. Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., McHugh P.R., Kessler J., Markowitsch H.J., Denzler P. Mini-mental Status Test 1990, Belz Test GmbH, Weinheim.
17. French-St George M., Bregman A. Role of predictability of sequence in auditory stream segregation. Percept. Psychophys. 1989, 46:384-386.
18. Frisina D.R., Frisina R.D. Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hear. Res. 1997, 106:95-104.
19. Green D.M., Sweets J.A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics 1966, Wiley, New York.
20. Hasher L., Zacks R.T. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 1988, 193-225. Academic Press, New York, NY. G.H. Bower (Ed.).
21. Hopkins K., Moore B.C.J. The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011, 130:334-349.
22. Jones M.R. Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychol. Rev. 1976, 83:323-355.
23. Jones M.R., Johnston H.M., Puente J. Effects of auditory pattern structure on anticipatory and reactive attending. Cognit. Psychol. 2006, 53:59-96.
24. Jones M.R., Kidd G., Wetzel R. Evidence for rhythmic attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1981, 7:1059-1073.
25. Kaernbach C. A single-interval adjustment-matrix (SIAM) procedure for unbiased adaptive testing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1990, 88:2645-2655.
26. Larsby B., Hällgren M., Lyxell B., Arlinger S. Cognitive performance and perceived effort in speech processing tasks: effects of different noise backgrounds in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Int. J. Audiol. 2005, 44:131-143.
27. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection Theory: a Users's Guide 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. second ed.
28. Mäntysalo S., Näätänen R. The duration of a neuronal trace of an auditory stimulus as indicated by event-related potentials. Biol. Psychol. 1987, 24:183-195.
29. Micheyl C., Oxenham A. Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2010, 11:709-724.
30. Moore B. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing 2003, Academic Press, London, UK. fifth ed.
31. Moore B.C.J., Gockel H. Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acust. 2002, 88:320-333.
32. Näätänen R., Astikainen P., Ruusuvirta T., Huotilainen M. Automatic auditory intelligence: an expression of the sensory-cognitive core of cognitive processes. Brain Res. Rev. 2010, 64:123-136.
33. Näätänen R., Kujala T., Winkler I. Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: a unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:4-22.
34. Pekkonen E. Mismatch negativity in aging and in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Audiol. Neurootol. 2000, 5:216-224.
35. Picton T.W., Alain C., Otten L., Ritter W., Achim A. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol. Neurootol. 2000, 5:111-139.
36. Rajan R., Cainer K.E. Ageing without hearing loss or cognitive impairment causes a decrease in speech intelligibility only in informational maskers. Neuroscience 2008, 154:784-795.
37. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Park D.C. Human neuroscience and the aging mind: a new look at old problems. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2010, 65B:405-415.
38. Rimmele J., Sussman E.S., Keitel C., Jacobsen T., Schröger E. Electrophysiological evidence for age effects on sensory memory processing of tonal patterns. Psychol. Aging 2011, Advance online publication. 10.1037/a0024866.
39. Rogers W., Bregman A. An experimental evaluation of three theories of auditory stream segregation. Percept. Psychophys. 1993, 53:179-189.
40. Schröger E. Mismatch negativity: a microphone into auditory memory. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 21:138-146.
41. Shinn-Cunningham B.G. Object-based auditory and visual attention. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:182-186.
42. Snyder J.S., Alain C. Age-related changes in neural activity associated with concurrent vowel segregation. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005, 24:492-499.
43. Snyder J.S., Alain C. Sequential auditory scene analysis is preserved in normal aging adults. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:501-512.
44. Sussman E., Ritter W., Vaughan H.G. Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system. Brain Res. 1998, 789:130-138.
45. Trainor L.J., Trehub S.E. Aging and auditory temporal sequencing: ordering the elements of repeating tone patterns. Percept. Psychophys. 1989, 45:4117-4426.
46. van Norden, L.P.A.S., 1975. Temporal Coherence in the Perception of Tone Sequences. Doctoral dissertation, Technical University Eindhoven.
47. Verhaeghen P., Cerella J. Everything we know about aging and response times: a meta-analytic integration. The Handbook of Cognitive Aging: Interdisciplinary Perspectives 2008, 134-150. Sage, L.A. S.M. Hofer, D.F. Alwin (Eds.).
48. Winkler I. Interpreting the mismatch negativity. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 21:147-163.
49. Winkler I., Denham S.L., Mill R., Bohm T.M., Bendixen A. Multistability in auditory stream segregation: a predictive coding view. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 367:1001-1012.
50. Winkler I., Denham S.L., Nelken I. Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13:532-540.
51. Winkler I., Kushnerenko E., Horváth J., Čeponiene R., Fellman V., Huotilainen M., Näätänen R., Sussman E. Newborn infants can organize the auditory world. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:11812-11815.
52. Winkler I., Sussman E., Tervaniemi M., Horvith J., Ritter W., Näätänen R. Preattentive auditory context effects. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2003, 3:57-77.
53. Yordanova J., Kolev V., Hohnsbein J., Falkenstein M. Sensorimotor slowing with ageing is mediated by a functional dysregulation of motor-generation processes: evidence from high-resolution event-related potentials. Brain 2004, 127:351-362.