Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes

Genetics Research

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 73-83

  Wang, H ^a   Misztal, I ^a   Aguilar, I ^b   Legarra, A ^c   Muir, W M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA INIA   (Uruguay)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC TRAIT; GENOTYPE; HERITABILITY; HUMAN; MALE; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GENOME; GENOTYPE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84861840812     PISSN: 00166723     EISSN: 14695073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0016672312000274     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aguilar, I., Misztal, I., Johnson, D. L., Legarra, A., Tsuruta, S. & Lawlor, T. J. (2010). Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 743-752.
2. Aguilar, I., Misztal, I., Legarra, A. & Tsuruta, S. (2011). Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 128, 422-428.
3. Bennett, B. J., Farber, C. R., Orozco, L., Kang, H. M., Ghazalpour, A., Sie mers, N., Neubauer, M., Neuhaus, I., Yordanova, R., Guan, B., Truong, A., Yang, W. P., He, A., Kayne, P., Gargalovic, P., Kirchgessner, T., Pan, C., Castellani, L. W., Kostem, E., Furlotte, N., Drake, T. A., Eskin, E. & Lusis, A. J. (2010). A highresolution association mapping panel for the dissection of complex traits in mice. Genome Research 20, 281-290.
4. Bolormaa, S., Pryce, J. E., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. E. (2010). Multivariate analysis of a genome-wide association study in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 3818-3833.
5. Chen, C. Y., Misztal, I., Aguilar, I., Legarra, A. & Muir, W. M. (2011). Effect of different genomic relationship matrices on accuracy and scale. Journal of Animal Science 89, 2673-2679.
6. Christensen, O. F. & Lund, M. S. (2010). Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Genetics Selection Evolution 42, 2.
7. Forni, S., Aguilar, I. & Misztal, I. (2011). Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 1.
8. Garrick, D. J., Taylor, J. F. & Fernando, R. L. (2009). Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Genetics Selection Evolution 41, 55.
9. Gianola, D., de los Campos, G., Hill, W. G., Manfredi, E. & Fernando, R. L. (2009). Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics 183, 347-363.
10. Goddard, M. E. & Hayes, B. J. (2009). Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nature Reviews Genetics 10, 381-391.
11. Habier, D., Fernando, R. L., Kizilkaya, K. & Garrick, D. J. (2010). Extension of the Bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. In The 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, p. 468. German Society for Animal Science, Leipzig, Germany.
12. Henderson, C. R. (1973). Sire evaluation and genetic trends. Journal of Animal Science 1973, 10-41.
13. Hirschhorn, J. N. & Daly, M. J. (2005). Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nature Reviews Genetics 6, 95-108.
14. Karlsson, E. K., Baranowska, I., Wade, C. M., Salmon Hillbertz, N. H., Zody, M. C., Anderson, N., Biagi, T. M., Patterson, N., Pielberg, G. R., Kulbokas, E. J., Comstock, K. E., Keller, E. T., Mesirov, J. P., von Euler, H., Kampe, O., Hedhammar, A., Lander, E. S., Andersson, G., Andersson, L. & Lindblad-Toh, K. (2007). Efficient mapping of mendelian traits in dogs through genome-wide association. Nature Genetics 39, 1321-1328.
15. Legarra, A., Aguilar, I. & Misztal, I. (2009). A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 4656-4663.
16. Legarra, A. & Ducrocq, V. (submitted). Computational strategies for national integration of phenotypic, genomic and pedigree data in a single-step BLUP. Journal of Dairy Science.
17. Legarra, A. & Misztal, I. (2008). Technical note: Computing strategies in genome-wide selection. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 360-366.
18. Legarra, A., Robert-Granie, C., Croiseau, P., Guillaume, F. & Fritz, S. (2011). Improved Lasso for genomic selection. Genetics Research 93, 77-87.
19. Meuwissen, T. H., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. E. (2001). Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819-1829.
20. Meyer, K. & Tier, B. (2012). SNP Snappy : a strategy for fast genome-wide association studies fitting a full mixed model. Genetics 190, 275-277.
21. Misztal, I., Legarra, A. & Aguilar, I. (2009). Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 4648-4655.
22. Misztal, I., Tsuruta, S., Strabel, T., Auvray, B., Druet, T. & Lee, D. H. (2002). BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). In The 7th World Congress Genetics Applicati on Livestock Production, pp. 28, Montpellier, France.
23. Mrode, R., Coffey, M. P., Straden, I., Meuwissen, T. H. E., Kaam, J. B. C. H. M. v., Kearney, J. F. & Berr, D. P. (2010). A comparison of various methods for the computation of genomic breeding values of dairy cattle using software at genomicselection.net. In the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Leipzig, Germany. Available at http://www.icbf.com/ publications/files/WCGALP2010-RMrode.pdf
24. Orr, N., Back, W., Gu, J., Leegwater, P., Govindarajan, P., Conroy, J., Ducro, B., Van Arendonk, J. A., MacHugh, D. E., Ennis, S., Hill, E. W. & Brama, P. A. (2010). Genome-wide SNP association-based localization of a dwarfism gene in Friesian dwarf horses. Animal Genetics 41 (Suppl. 2), 2-7.
25. Ostersen, T., Christensen, O. F., Henryon, M., Nielsen, B., Su, G. & Madsen, P. (2011). Degressed EBV as the response variable yield more reliable genomic predictions than traditional EBV in pure-bred pigs. Genetics Selection Evolution 43(1), 38.
26. Pryce, J. E., Bolormaa, S., Chamberlain, A. J., Bowman, P. J., Savin, K., Goddard, M. E. & Hayes, B. J. (2010). A validated genome-wide association study in 2 dairy cattle breeds for milk production and fertility traits using variable length haplotypes. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 3331-3345.
27. Sargolzaei, M. & Schenkel, F. S. (2009). QMSim: a largescale genome simulator for livestock. Bioinformatics 25, 680-681.
28. Servin, B. & Stephens, M. (2007). Imputation-based analysis of association studies: candidate regions and quantitative traits. PLoS Genetics 3, e114.
29. Sillanpaa, M. J. (2011). Overview of techniques to account for confounding due to population stratification and cryptic relatedness in genomic data association analyses. Heredity 106, 511-519.
30. Stranden, I. & Garrick, D. J. (2009). Technical note: Derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2971-2975.
31. Sun, X., Fernando, R. L., Garrick, D. J. & Dekkers, J. C. M. (2011). An iterative approach for efficient calculation of breeding values and genome-wide association analysis using weighted genomic BLUP. Journal of Animal Science 89 (E-Suppl 2), e11.
32. VanRaden, P. M., Van Tassell, C. P., Wiggans, G. R., Sonstegard, T. S., Schnabel, R. D., Taylor, J. F. & Schenkel, F. S. (2009). Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 16-24.
33. Villumsen, T. M., Janss, L. & Lund, M. S. (2009). The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 126, 3-13.
34. Visscher, P. M., Macgregor, S., Benyamin, B., Zhu, G., Gordon, S., Medland, S., Hill, W. G., Hottenga, J. J., Willemsen, G., Boomsma, D. I., Liu, Y. Z., Deng, H. W., Montgomery, G. W. & Martin, N. G. (2007). Genome partitioning of genetic variation for height from 11,214 sibling pairs. American Journal of Human Genetics 81, 1104-1110.
35. Vitezica, Z. G., Aguilar, I., Misztal, I. & Legarra, A. (2011). Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. Genetics Research 93, 357-366.
36. Wakefield, J. (2009). Bayes factors for genome-wide association studies: comparison with P-values. Genetic Epidemiology 33, 79-86.
37. Xu, S. (2010). An expectation-maximization algorithm for the Lasso estimation of quantitative trait locus effects. Heredity 105, 483-494.
38. Zhang, Z., Liu, J., Ding, X., Bijma, P., de Koning, D. J. & Zhang, Q. (2010). Best linear unbiased prediction of genomic breeding values using a trait-specific markerderived relationship matrix. PLoS One 5, e12648.
39. Zondervan, K. T. & Cardon, L. R. (2004). The complex interplay among factors that influence allelic association. Nature Reviews Genetics 5, 89-100.