Propensity scores: From naïve enthusiasm to intuitive understanding

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 273-293

  Williamson, Elizabeth ^a,b,c   Morley, Ruth ^a,b   Lucas, Alan ^d   Carpenter, James ^e  

^a MURDOCH CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

confounding; inverse probability weighting; matching; observational study; propensity score; stratification

Indexed keywords

BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; BREAST FEEDING; BREAST MILK; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INFANT NUTRITION; INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT; METHODOLOGY; MOTHER; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PROPENSITY SCORE; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; WECHSLER INTELLIGENCE SCALE; ARTICLE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PROBABILITY;

CAUSALITY; HUMANS; PROBABILITY;

EID: 84861837320     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: 14770334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0962280210394483     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (58)

1. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983 ; 70: 41-55
2. Senn S, Graf E, Caputo A. Stratification for the propensity score compared with linear regression techniques to assess the effect of treatment or exposure. Stat Med. 2007 ; 26: 5529-5544
3. D'Agostino RB. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998 ; 17: 2265-2281
4. Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR. Invited commentary: Propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 ; 150: 327-333
5. Austin PC, Mamdani MM. A comparison of propensity score methods: A case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use. Stat Med. 2006 ; 25: 2084-2106
6. Kurth T, Walker AM, Glynn RJ, et al. Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect. Am J Epidemiol. 2006 ; 163: 262-270
7. Austin PC. Discussion of 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003'. Stat Med. 2008 ; 27: 2066-2069
8. Austin PC. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med. 2008 ; 27: 2037-2049
9. Rodgers B. Feeding in infancy and later ability and attainment: a longitudinal study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1978 ; 20: 421-426
10. Weschler D Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children, Anglicized revised edition. Sidcup, Kent: The Psychological Corporation Ltd. ; 1974 :
11. Holland PW. Statistics and causal inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 1986 ; 81: 945-960
12. Imbens GW. Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Rev Econ Stat. 2004 ; 86: 4-29
13. Cole SR, Hernán MA. Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. Am J Epidemiol. 2008 ; 168: 656-664
14. Rubin DB. Bias reduction using Mahalanobis-metric matching. Biometrics. 1980 ; 36: 293-298
15. Little R, Rubin D. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches. Ann Rev Public Health. 2000 ; 21: 121-145
16. Hullsiek KH, Louis TA. Propensity score modeling strategies for the causal analysis of observational data. Biostatistics. 2002 ; 3: 179-193
17. Lunceford JK, Davidian M. Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study. Stat Med. 2004 ; 23: 2937-2960
18. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc. 1984 ; 79: 516-524
19. Baser O. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching. Value Health. 2006 ; 9: 377-385
20. Hill J. Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: Comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine. Stat Med. 2008 ; 27: 2055-2061
21. Zhao Z. Using matching to estimate treatment effects: Data requirements, matching metrics, and Monte Carlo evidence. Rev Econ Stat. 2004 ; 86: 91-107
22. Rubin DB. On principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safe. 2004 ; 13: 855-857
23. Weitzen S, Lapane KL, Toledano AY, Hume AL, Mor V. Principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research: a systematic literature review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safe. 2004 ; 13: 841-853
24. Drake C. Effects of misspecification of the propensity score on estimators of treatment effect. Biometrics. 1993 ; 49: 1231-1236
25. Zhao Z. Sensitivity of propensity score methods to the specifications. Econ Lett. 2008 ; 98: 309-319
26. McCaffrey DF, Ridgeway G, Morral AR. Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychol Methods. 2004 ; 9: 403-425
27. Setoguchi S, Schneeweiss S, Brookhart MA, Glynn RJ, Cook EF. Evaluating uses of data mining techniques in propensity score estimation: a simulation study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safe. 2008 ; 17: 546-555
28. Judkins DR, Morganstein D, Zador P, Piesse A, Barrett B, Mukhopadhyay P. Variable selection and raking in propensity scoring. Stat Med. 2007 ; 26: 1022-1033
29. Gu XS, Rosenbaum PR. Comparison of multivariate matching methods: structures, distances and algorithms. J Comput Graph Stat. 1993 ; 2: 405-420
30. Brookhart MA, Schneeweiss S, Rothman KJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Stuürmer T. Variable selection for propensity score models. Am J Epidemiol. 2006 ; 163: 1149-1156
31. Austin PC. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safe. 2008 ; 17: 1218-1225
32. Austin PC. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safe. 2008 ; 17: 1202-1217
33. Stuart EA. Developing practical recommendations for the use of propensity scores: Discussion of 'A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine. Stat Med. 2008 ; 27: 2062-2065
34. Stuürmer T, Schneeweiss S, Avorn J, Glynn RJ. Adjusting effect estimates for unmeasured confounding with validation data using propensity score calibration. Am J Epidemiol. 2005 ; 162: 279-289
35. Weitzen S, Lapane KL, Toledano AY, Hume AL, Mor V. Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: the case of the omitted confounder. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safe. 2005 ; 14: 227-238
36. Rosenbaum PR Observational studies. 2 nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002. New York: Springer-Verlag ; 2002 :
37. Heckman J, Ichimura H, Smith J, Todd P. Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica. 1998 ; 66: 1017-1098
38. Austin PC, Grootendorst P, Normand SLT, Anderson GM. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: A Monte Carlo study. Stat Med. 2007 ; 26: 754-768
39. Austin PC. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 ; 61: 537-545
40. Greenland S, Robins JM, Pearl J. Confounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference. Stat Sci. 1999 ; 14: 29-46
41. Martens EP, Pestman WR, Klungel OH. Letter to the Editor: Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: A Monte Carlo study. Stat Med. 2007 ; 26: 3205-3212
42. Forbes A, Shortreed S. Inverse probability weighted estimation of the marginal odds ratio: Correspondence regarding 'The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios'. Stat Med. 2008 ; 27: 5556-5559
43. Austin PC. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios. Stat Med. 2007 ; 26: 3078-3094
44. Greenland S. Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 ; 125: 761-768
45. Imbens GW. The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika. 2000 ; 87: 706-710
46. Williamson E, PhD thesis, Inference from estimates of exposure effects using stratification on the propensity score London: London School of Hygiene &Tropical Medicine ; 2008 :
47. Hill J, Reiter JP. Interval estimation for treatment effects using propensity score matching. Stat Med. 2006 ; 25: 2230-2256
48. Tu WZ, Zhou XH. A bootstrap confidence interval procedure for the treatment effect using propensity score subclassification. Health Serv Outcome Res Methodol. 2002 ; 3: 135-147
49. Lucas A, Morley R, Cole TJ, Lister G, Leeson-Payne C. Breast-milk and subsequent intelligence quotient in children born preterm. Lancet. 1992 ; 339: 261-264
50. Lucas A, Gore SM, Cole TJ, et al. Multicenter trial on feeding low-birthweight infants - effects of diet on early growth. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1984 ; 59: 722-730
51. Lucas A, Morley R, Cole TJ, et al. Early diet in preterm babies and developmental status at 18 months. Lancet. 1990 ; 335: 1477-1481
52. Carpenter J, Bithell J. Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med. 2000 ; 19: 1141-1164
53. Robins JM, Mark SD, Newey WK. Estimating exposure effects by modeling the expectation of exposure conditional on confounders. Biometrics. 1992 ; 48: 479-495
54. Fitzmaurice G. Confounding: propensity score adjustment. Nutrition. 2006 ; 22: 1214-1216
55. Shah BR, Laupacis A, Hux JE, Austin PC. Propensity score methods gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 ; 58: 550-559
56. Rubin DB, Thomas N. Combining propensity score matching with additional adjustments for prognostic covariates. J Am Stat Assoc. 2000 ; 95: 573-585
57. Mattei A. Estimating and using propensity score in presence of missing background data: an application to assess the impact of childbearing on wellbeing. Stat Methods Appl. 2009 ; 18: 257-273
58. Qu Y, Lipkovich I. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a mutiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach. Stat Med. 2009 ; 28: 1402-1414