Research priorities for nursing professional development: A modified e-delphi study

Journal for Nurses in Staff Development

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 137-142

  Harper, Mary G ^a   Asselin, Marilyn E ^b   Kurtz, Abby C ^c   MacArthur, Susan K ^d   Perron, Sarah ^e  

^a MN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH   (United States)

^c BRONX LEBANON HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Maury Regional Medical Center   (United States)

^e ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DELPHI STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED NURSING; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; MANPOWER; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH; NURSING DISCIPLINE; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TIME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ADVISORY COMMITTEES; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (U.S.); MIDDLE AGED; NURSING ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; SPECIALTIES, NURSING; STAFF DEVELOPMENT; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84861831917     PISSN: 10987886     EISSN: 15389049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NND.0b013e3182551543     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. American Nurses Association & National Nursing Staff Development Organization. (2010). Nursing professional development scope and standards of practice. Silver Spring, MD: Nursesbooks.org.
2. Blackwood, B., Albarran, J. W., & Latour, J. (2011). Research priorities of adult intensive care nurses in 20 European countries: A Delphi study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(3), 550Y562.
3. Cannon, S., & Boswell, C. (2012). Evidence-based teaching in nursing: A foundation for educators. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
4. De Villiers, M. R., De Villiers, P. J., & Kent, A. P. (2005). The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Medical Teacher, 27(7), 639-643.
5. Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care. The Millbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44(3), 166-206.
6. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
7. Institute of Medicine. (2010. Future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
8. Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. (2011). The Delphi technique in nursing and health research.West Sussex, UK:Wiley-Blackwell.
9. Krugman, M., & Warren, J. (2011). Professional development research literature from 1996-2006. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 27(3), 104-115.
10. Shultz, C. (Ed.). (2009). Building a science of nursing education: Foundation for evidence-based teaching-learning. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
11. Vernon, W. (2009). The Delphi technique: A review. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(2), 69-76.
12. Wiener, B., Chacko, S., Brown, T., Cron, S., & Cohen, M. (2009). Delphi survey of research priorities. Journal of Nursing Management, 17(5), 532-538.
13. Wilson, S., Ramelet, A., & Zuiderduyn, S. (2010). Research priorities for nursing care of infants, children and adolescents: AWest Australian Delphi study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(13/14), 1919-1928.
14. Zeigler, V., & Decker-Walters, B. (2010). Determining psychosocial research priorities for adolescents with implantable cardioverter defibrillators using Delphi methodology. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 25(5), 398-404.