Comparative study on factors affecting anaerobic digestion of agricultural vegetal residues

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Volumn 5, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Cioabla, Adrian Eugen ^a   Ionel, Ioana ^a   Dumitrel, Gabriela Alina ^a   Popescu, Francisc ^a  

^a POLITEHNICA UNIVERSITY OF TIMISOARA   (Romania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS; ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION; ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION PROCESS; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; BIOMASS POTENTIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DIRECT IMPACT; FOSSIL FUEL RESOURCES; GREEN ENERGY; MONITORING PROCESS; PH VALUE; PROCESS CONDITION; PROCESS PARAMETERS; TEMPERATURE REGIMES; WHEAT BRAN;

AGRICULTURE; ALTERNATIVE FUELS; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIOGAS; BIOMASS; FERMENTATION; FOSSIL FUELS;

SUBSTRATES;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOGAS; BIOMASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FERMENTATION; PH; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; WHEAT;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84861819287     PISSN: 17546834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-39     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Samir KK, Rao YS, Tian CZ, Buddhi PL, Tyagi RD, Kao CM, Bioenergy and biofuel from biowastes and biomass Reston:American Society of Civil Engineers 2010 44
2. Regulation and innovation in biogas technology in selected European countries. Decker T, Menrad K, Int J Public Policy 2007 2 Nos. 89
3. Anaerobic digestion of vegetable market waste in India, World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable. Kumar S, Mukherjee S, Devotta S, Development 2010 7 No. 3 217
4. Modelling of anaerobic digestion-a review. Lyberatos G, Skiadas IV, Global Nest: The International Journal 1999 1 2 63 76
5. Production of methane from sugar beet silage without manure addition by a single-stage anaerobic digestion process. Demirel B, Scherer P, Biomass Bioenerg 2008 32 3 203 209 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.09.011 (Pubitemid 351226554)
6. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Ward AJ, Hobbs PJ, Holliman PJ, Jones DL, Bioresource Technol 2008 99 7928 7940 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.044
7. Comparative assessment of anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. Surroop D, Mohee R, Int J Environ Technol Manag 2011 14 Nos. 1/2/3/4 238
8. The effects of digestion temperature and temperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Chae KJ, Jang A, Yim SK, Kim IS, Bioresource Technol 2008 99 1 6 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.063 (Pubitemid 47516657)
9. Effect of temperature on the anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent. Choorit W, Wisarnwan P, Electron J Biotechn 2007 10 No.3, Issue of July 15 376
10. Anaerobic digestion of onion residuals using a mesophilic Anaerobic Phased Solids Digester. Romano RT, Zhang R, Biomass Bioenerg 2011 35 Issue 10 4174 4179
11. Effect of different solid concentration on biogas yield and composition during anaerobic fermentation process. Wu L, Hao Y, Sun C, Liu R, International Journal Global Energy Issues 2009 31 Nos. 3/4 240
12. Performance study for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a single phase reactor. Kumar S, Intl J Environ Pollut 2010 43 Nos. 1/2/3 16
13. Study connected with wood residues behavior during anaerobic fermentation process. Cioabla AE, Ionel I, Popescu F, Environ Eng Manag J 2010 9 10 1411 1416
14. Correlative comparison of two optoelectronic carbon monoxide measuring instruments. Ionel I, Ionel S, Nicole D, Jl Optoelectron Adv Ms 2007 9 11 3541 3545
15. Ensiling of crops for biogas production: effects on methane yield and total solids determination. Kreuger E, Nges IA, Björnsson L, Biotechnol Biofuels 2011 4 44 10.1186/1754-6834-4-44 22032645