Cochlear implant performance in geriatric patients

Laryngoscope

Volumn 122, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1361-1365

  Lenarz, Minoo ^b   Sönmez, Hasibe ^b   Joseph, Gert ^a   Büchner, Andreas ^a   Lenarz, Thomas ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; geriatric patients; performance

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GERIATRIC PATIENT; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING CURVE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; GERMANY; HEARING LOSS, BILATERAL; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861810779     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.23232     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Francis HW, Chee N, Yeagle J, Cheng A, Niparko JK,. Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults. Laryngoscope 2002 112: 1482-1488.
2. Vermeire K, Brokx JP, Wuyts FL, Cochet E, Hofkens A, Van de Heyning PH,. Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26: 188-195.
3. Budenz CL, Cosetti DH, Coelho DH, et al. The effect of cochlear implantation on speech perception in older adults. Am Geriatr Soc 2011; 59: 446-453.
4. Gates GA, Mills JH,. Presbycusis. Lancet 2005; 366: 1111-1120.
5. Hahlbrock KH,. Speech audiometry and new word-tests. Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd 1953; 162: 394-431.
6. De Filippo CL, Scott BL,. A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 1186-1192.
7. Hochmair I, Nopp P, Jolly C, et al. MED-EL cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future. Trends Amplif 2006; 10: 201-219.
8. Herzog M, Schon F, Muller J, Knaus C, Scholz L, Helms J,. Long term results after cochlear implantation in elderly patients [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 2003; 82: 490-493.
9. Friedland DR, Runge-Samuelson C, Baig H, Jensen J,. Case-control analysis of cochlear implant performance in elderly patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136: 432-438.
10. Humes LE,. Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 1112-1132.
11. Wong PCM, Uppunda AK, Parrish TB, Dhar S,. Cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51: 1026-1041.
12. Wong PCM, Ettlinger M, Sheppard JP, Gunasekera GM, Dhar S,. Neuroanatomical characteristics and speech perception in noise in older adults. Ear Hear 2010; 31: 471-479.
13. Frisina DR, Frisina RD,. Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hear Res 1997; 106: 95-104.
14. Akeroyd MA,. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol 2008; 47: 53-71.
15. Harris KC, Dubno JR, Keren NI, Ahlstrom JB, Eckert MA,. Speech recognition in younger and older adults: A dependency on low-level auditory cortex. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 6078 - 6087.
16. Anderson S, Parbery-Clark A, Yi HG, Kraus N,. Neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults. Ear Hear 2011; 32: 750-757.