Adaptation of clinical prediction models for application in local settings

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Kappen, Teus H ^a   Vergouwe, Yvonne ^a   Van Klei, Wilton A ^a   Van Wolfswinkel, Leo ^a   Kalkman, Cor J ^a   Moons, Karel G M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

clinical prediction rules; decision rules; methodology; provider decision making; statistical methods

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84861793982     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X12439755     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Reilly BM, Evans AT. Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med. 2006 ; 144: 201-9
2. Moons KG, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, Grobbee DE, Altman DG. Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how?. BMJ. 2009 ; 338: b375
3. Justice AC, Covinsky KE, Berlin JA. Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann Intern Med. 1999 ; 130: 515-24
4. Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, Royston P, Moons KG. Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model. BMJ. 2009 ; 338: b605
5. Moons KG, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, Royston P. Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice. BMJ. 2009 ; 338: b606
6. Steyerberg EW, Borsboom GJ, van Houwelingen HC, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD. Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkage. Stat Med. 2004 ; 23: 2567-86
7. Janssen KJ, Moons KG, Kalkman CJ, Grobbee DE, Vergouwe Y. Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 ; 61: 76-86
8. Janssen KJ, Vergouwe Y, Kalkman CJ, Grobbee DE, Moons KG. A simple method to adjust clinical prediction models to local circumstances. Can J Anaesth. 2009 ; 56: 194-201
9. Janssen KJ, Vergouwe Y, Donders AR, et al. Dealing with missing predictor values when applying clinical prediction models. Clin Chem. 2009 ; 55: 994-1001
10. Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, et al. A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2004 ; 350: 2441-51
11. Watcha MF, White PF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting: its etiology, treatment, and prevention. Anesthesiology. 1992 ; 77: 162-84
12. Gan TJ, Meyer TA, Apfel CC, et al. Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2007 ; 105: 1615-28
13. Van den Bosch JE, Moons KG, Bonsel GJ, Kalkman CJ. Does measurement of preoperative anxiety have added value for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting?. Anesth Analg. 2005 ; 100: 1525-32
14. Visser K, Hassink EA, Bonsel GJ, Moen J, Kalkman CJ. Randomized controlled trial of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane-nitrous oxide: postoperative nausea with vomiting and economic analysis. Anesthesiology. 2001 ; 95: 616-26
15. Ahmed AB, Hobbs GJ, Curran JP. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of combination antiemetic prophylaxis for day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000 ; 85: 678-82
16. Tseng LH, Liou SC, Chang TC, Tsai SC, Soong YK, Wong SY. A randomized blinded study of the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women after major gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 ; 13: 413-7
17. Myles PS, Leslie K, Chan MT, et al. Avoidance of nitrous oxide for patients undergoing major surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2007 ; 107: 221-31
18. Philip BK, Kallar SK, Bogetz MS, Scheller MS, Wetchler BV. A multicenter comparison of maintenance and recovery with sevoflurane or isoflurane for adult ambulatory anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1996 ; 83: 314-9
19. Moons KG, Donders RA, Stijnen T, Harrell FE. Using the outcome for imputation of missing predictor values was preferred. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 ; 59: 1092-101
20. Donders AR, van der Heijden GJ, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 ; 59: 1087-91
21. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience; 2004.
22. Cox DR. Two further applications of a model for binary regression. Biometrika. 1958 ; 45: 562-5
23. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996 ; 15: 361-87
24. Vergouwe Y, Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD. Validity of prognostic models: when is a model clinically useful?. Semin Urol Oncol. 2002 ; 20: 96-107
25. Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, et al. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology. 2010 ; 21: 128-38
26. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB, Steyerberg EW. Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med. 2011 ; 30: 11-21
27. Eberhart LH, Hogel J, Seeling W, Staack AM, Geldner G, Georgieff M. Evaluation of three risk scores to predict postoperative nausea and vomiting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000 ; 44: 480-8
28. Apfel CC, Kranke P, Eberhart LH, Roos A, Roewer N. Comparison of predictive models for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth. 2002 ; 88: 234-40
29. Van den Bosch JE, Kalkman CJ, Vergouwe Y, et al. Assessing the applicability of scoring systems for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia. 2005 ; 60: 323-31
30. Ivanov J, Tu JV, Naylor CD. Ready-made, recalibrated, or remodeled? Issues in the use of risk indexes for assessing mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 1999 ; 99: 2098-104
31. van Houwelingen HC. Validation, calibration, revision and combination of prognostic survival models. Stat Med. 2000 ; 19: 3401-15
32. Hlatky MA, Greenland P, Arnett DK, et al. Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2009 ; 119: 2408-16
33. Moons KG. Criteria for scientific evaluation of novel markers: a perspective. Clin Chem. 2010 ; 56: 537-41