Examining the effects of remote-video confederates on young women's food intake

Eating Behaviors

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 246-251

  Hermans, Roel C J ^a   Salvy, Sarah Jeanne ^b   Larsen, Junilla K ^a   Engels, Rutger C M E ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Food intake; Modeling; Remote confederate; Women

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET RESTRICTION; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; HUMAN; PORTION SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REMOTE VIDEO CONFEDERATE; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENT ATTITUDE; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT; VIDEOTAPE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EATING; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; WOMEN;

EID: 84861762349     PISSN: 14710153     EISSN: 18737358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anschutz D.J., Engels R.C.M.E., Becker E.S., van Strien T. The bold and the beautiful. Influence of body size of televised models on body dissatisfaction and actual food intake. Appetite 2008, 51:530-537.
2. Bell R., Meiselman H.L. The role of eating environments in determining food choice. Food choice and the consumer 1995, 292-310. Blackie Academic & Professional, Glasgow. D. Marshall (Ed.).
3. Bevelander K.E., Anschutz D.J., Engels R.C.M.E. Social modeling of food purchases at supermarkets in teenage girls. Appetite 2011, 57:99-104.
4. Bock B.C., Kanarek R.B. Women and men are what they eat: the effects of gender and reported meal size on perceived characteristics. Sex Roles 1995, 33:109-119.
5. Brunner T.A. How weight-related cues affect food intake in a modeling situation. Appetite 2010, 55:507-511.
6. Chaiken S., Pliner P. Women, but not men, are what they eat: The effect of meal size and gender on perceived femininity and masculinity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1987, 13:166-176.
7. Christensen P.N., Rothgerber H., Wood W., Matz D.C. Social norms and identity relevance: A motivational approach to normative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2004, 30:1295-1309.
8. Conger J.C., Conger A.J., Costanzo P.R., Wright K.L., Matter J.A. The effects of social cues on the eating behavior of obese and normal subjects. Journal of Personality 1980, 48:258-271.
9. Deutsch M., Gerard H.G. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1955, 51:629-636.
10. Feeney J.R., Polivy J., Pliner P., Sullivan M.D. Comparing live and remote models in eating conformity research. Eating Behaviors 2011, 12:75-77.
11. Goldman S.J., Herman C.P., Polivy J. Is the effect of a social model attenuated by hunger?. Appetite 1991, 17:129-140.
12. Herman C.P., Polivy J. Normative influences on food intake. Physiology & Behavior 2005, 86:762-772.
13. Herman C.P., Polivy J. External cues in the control of food intake in humans: The sensory-normative distinction. Physiology & Behavior 2008, 94:722-728.
14. Herman C.P., Roth D.A., Polivy J. Effects of the presence of others on food intake: A normative interpretation. Psychological Bulletin 2003, 129:873-886.
15. Hermans R.C.J., Engels R.C.M.E., Larsen J.K., Herman C.P. Modeling of palatable food intake. The influence of the quality of social interaction. Appetite 2009, 52:801-804.
16. Hermans R.C.J., Herman C.P., Larsen J.K., Engels R.C.M.E. Social modeling effects on snack intake among young men. The role of hunger. Appetite 2010, 54:378-383.
17. Hermans R.C.J., Herman C.P., Larsen J.K., Engels R.C.M.E. Social modeling effects on young women's breakfast intake. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2010, 110:1901-1905.
18. Hermans R.C.J., Larsen J.K., Herman C.P., Engels R.C.M.E. Modeling of palatable food intake. Effects of perceived body size. Appetite 2008, 51:512-518.
19. Hill J.O., Peters J.C. Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. Science 1998, 280:1371-1374.
20. Leone T., Pliner P., Herman C.P. Influence of clear versus ambiguous normative information on food intake. Appetite 2007, 49:58-65.
21. Lohman T.G., Roche A.F., Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual 1998, Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, IL.
22. Nisbett R.E., Storms M.D. Cognitive and social determinants of food intake. Thought and feeling: Cognitive alteration of feeling states 1974, 190-208. Aldine, Chicago, IL. H. London, R.E. Nisbett (Eds.).
23. Pliner P., Mann N. Influence of social norms and palatability on amount consumed and food choice. Appetite 2004, 42:227-237.
24. Polivy J., Heatherton T.F., Herman C.P. Self-esteem, restraint, and eating behaviour. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1988, 97:354-356.
25. Romero N.D., Epstein L.H., Salvy S.-J. Peer modeling influences girls' snack intake. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2009, 109:133-136.
26. Rosenthal B., Marx R.D. Modeling influences on the eating behavior of successful and unsuccessful dieters and untreated normal weight individuals. Addictive Behaviors 1979, 4:215-221.
27. Roth D.A., Herman C.P., Polivy J., Pliner P. Self-presentational conflict in social eating situations: A normative perspective. Appetite 2001, 36:165-171.
28. Salvy S.-J., Coelho J.S., Kieffer E., Epstein L.H. Effects of social context on overweight and normal-weight children's food intake. Physiology & Behavior 2007, 92:840-846.
29. Tetley A., Brunstrom J., Griffiths P. Individual differences in food-cue reactivity. The role of BMI and everyday portion-size selections. Appetite 2009, 52:614-620.
30. Van Strien T., Frijters J.E.R., Bergers G.P.A., Defares P.B. The Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional and external eating behaviour. International Journal of Eating Disorders 1986, 5:295-315.
31. Vartanian L.R., Herman C.P., Polivy J. Consumption stereotypes and impression management: How you are what you eat. Appetite 2007, 48:265-277.