What's the Point of “Knowledge” Anyway?

Episteme

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 53-66

  Kelp, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861737031     PISSN: 17423600     EISSN: 17500117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3366/epi.2011.0006     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Cohen S. 1999. “Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons.” Philosophical Perspectives 13: 57–89.
2. Craig E. 1990. Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. DeRose K. 1992. “Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 912–29.
4. Fricker M. 2008. “Scepticism and the Genealogy of Knowledge.” Philosophical Papers 37: 27–50.
5. Greco J. 2007. “The Purpose of Knowledge and the Nature of Ability.” Philosophical Issues 17: 57–69.
6. Greco J. 2008. “What's Wrong with Contextualism?” The Philosophical Quarterly 58: 416–35.
7. Kusch M. 2009. “Testimony and the Value of Knowledge.” In Haddock A., Millar A., and Pritchard D. (eds.), Epistemic Value, pp. 60–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Kvanvig J. 2003. The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Millikan R. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Pritchard D. 2009. Knowledge. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Pritchard D. 2010. “Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology.” Manuscript.
12. Riggs W. 2008. “The Value Turn in Epistemology.” In Hendricks V. and Pritchard D. (eds.), New Waves in Epistemology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.