Variation: Use it or misuse it - replication and its variants

Journal of Physiology

Volumn 590, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2539-2542

  Drummond, Gordon B ^a   Vowler, Sarah L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEASUREMENT; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOREPLICATION; RANDOMIZATION; SAMPLING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VARIANCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; RANIDAE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 84861709821     PISSN: 00223751     EISSN: 14697793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.234260     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Drummond GB & Vowler SL (2012a). Analysis of variance: variably complex. J Physiol 590, 1303-1306.
2. Drummond GB & Vowler SL (2012b). Categorized or continuous? Strength of an association - and linear regression. J Physiol 590, 2061-2064.
3. Festing MFW (2003). Principles: The need for better experimental design. Trends Pharmacol Sci 24, 341-345.
4. Hurlbert SH (1984). Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54, 187-211.
5. Lazic SE (2011). The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis? BMC Neurosci 11, 5.