|
Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 286-291
|
A clinical evaluation comparing two H2O2 concentrations used with a light-assisted chairside tooth whitening system.
a a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
HYDROGEN PEROXIDE;
TOOTH BLEACHING AGENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CANINE TOOTH;
CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COLOR;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DENTAL PROCEDURE;
DENTIN SENSITIVITY;
DRUG EFFECT;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
GEL;
GINGIVA;
GINGIVITIS;
HUMAN;
INCISOR;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
MOUTH MUCOSA;
PATHOLOGY;
PHOTOCHEMOTHERAPY;
SAFETY;
TIME;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ADULT;
AGED;
COLOR;
CUSPID;
DENTIN SENSITIVITY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
GELS;
GINGIVA;
GINGIVITIS;
HUMANS;
HYDROGEN PEROXIDE;
INCISOR;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
MOUTH MUCOSA;
PHOTOCHEMOTHERAPY;
SAFETY;
TIME FACTORS;
TOOTH BLEACHING;
TOOTH BLEACHING AGENTS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
YOUNG ADULT;
|
EID: 84861709258
PISSN: 15488578
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (0)
|