The binding problem lives on: Comment on Di Lollo

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 307-308

  Wolfe, Jeremy M ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; BINDING PROBLEM; LETTER; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

AWARENESS; HUMANS; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84861698440     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.013     Document Type: Letter

References (9)

1. Di Lollo V. The feature-binding problem is an ill-posed problem. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:317-321.
2. Malsburg, von der C. The correlation theory of brain function. Models of Neural Networks II: Temporal Aspects of Coding and Information Processing in Biological Systems 1981, 95-119. Springer-Verlag, (reprinted in1994). J.L. Domany (Ed.).
3. Treisman A. The binding problem. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1996, 6:171-178.
4. Wolfe J.M., Cave K.R. The psychophysical evidence for a binding problem in human vision. Neuron 1999, 24:11-17.
5. Rosenholtz R., et al. A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains. J. Vis. 2012, 12. article 14.
6. Wolfe J.M., Bennett S.C. Preattentive object files: shapeless bundles of basic features. Vis. Res. 1997, 37:25-43.
7. Rensink R.A. Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vis. Res. 2000, 40:1469-1487.
8. Li F.F., et al. Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:9596-9601.
9. Serre T., et al. A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:6424-6429.