Foreshadowing of performance accuracy by event-related potentials: Evidence from a minimal-conflict task

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Masaki, Hiroaki ^a   Murphy, Timothy I ^b   Kamijo, Keita ^a   Yamazaki, Katuo ^a   Sommer, Werner ^c  

^a WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONFLICT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROMYOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ALISMATACEAE;

BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84861694883     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038006     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Freude G, Ullsperger P, Krüger H, Pietschmann M, (1989) Bereitschaftspotential and the efficiency of mental task performance. Journal of Psychophysiology 3: 377-385.
2. Casini L, Macar F, (1996) Can the level of prefrontal activity provide an index of performance in humans? Neuroscience Letters 219: 71-74.
3. Ford JM, (1999) Schizophrenia: The broken P300 and beyond. Psychophysiology 36: 667-682.
4. Vidal F, Burle B, Bonnet M, Grapperon J, Hasbroucq T, (2003) Error negativity on correct trials: a reexamination of available data. Biological Psychology 64: 265-282.
5. Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoormann J, Blanke L, (1991) Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 78: 447-455.
6. Gehring WJ, Goss B, Coles MGH, Meyer DE, Donchin E, (1993) A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science 4: 385-390.
7. Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, et al. (1998) Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Error Detection, and the Online Monitoring of Performance. Science 280: 747-749.
8. Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD, (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 108: 624-652.
9. Hoffmann S, Falkenstein M, (2010) Independent component analysis of erroneous and correct responses suggests online response control. Hum Brain Mapp 31: 1305-1315.
10. Coles MGH, Scheffers MK, Holroyd CB, (2001) Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing. Biological Psychology 56: 173-189.
11. Scheffers MK, Coles MGH, (2000) Performance monitoring in a confusing world: Error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26: 141-151.
12. Ridderinkhof K, (2003) Errors are foreshadowed in brain potentials associated with action monitoring in cingulate cortex in humans. Neuroscience Letters 348: 1-4.
13. Allain S, Carbonnell L, Falkenstein M, Burle B, Vidal F, (2004) The modulation of the Ne-like wave on correct responses foreshadows errors. Neuroscience Letters 372: 161-166.
14. Hajcak G, Nieuwenhuis S, Ridderinkhof KR, Simons RF, (2005) Error-preceding brain activity: Robustness, temporal dynamics, and boundary conditions. Biological Psychology 70: 67-78.
15. Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW, (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics 16: 143-149.
16. Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E, (1992) Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 121: 480-506.
17. Sturmer B, Leuthold H, Soetens E, Schroter H, Sommer W, (2002) Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 28: 1345-1363.
18. Simon JR, Rudell AP, (1967) Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology 51: 300-304.
19. Burle B, Allain S, Vidal F, Hasbroucq T, (2005) Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control: Does conflict really matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 31: 831-837.
20. Kawabe S, Ohtsuki T, (1982) Correction of error reaction caused by feinting stimulus: on the time necessary for switching of the motor command between contralateral wrist flexors. Japanese Journal of Physical Education 27: 217-227.
21. Notebaert W, Houtman F, Opstal FV, Gevers W, Fias W, et al. (2009) Post-error slowing: an orienting account. Cognition 111: 275-279.
22. Padilla ML, Wood RA, Hale LA, Knight RT, Lapses in a prefrontal-extrastriate preparatory attention network predict mistakes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 1477-1487.
23. Jentzsch I, Sommer W, (2001) Sequence-sensitive subcomponents of P300: Topographical analyses and dipole source localization. Psychophysiology 38: 607-621.
24. Sommer W, Leuthold H, Soetens E, (1999) Covert signs of expectancy in serial reaction time tasks revealed by event-related potentials. Perception & Psychophysics 61: 342-353.
25. Eichele T, Debener S, Calhoun VD, Specht K, Engel AK, et al. (2008) Prediction of human errors by maladaptive changes in event-related brain networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 6173-6178.
26. Oldfield RC, (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113.
27. Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E, (1983) A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 55: 468-484.
28. Masaki H, Takasawa N, Yamazaki K, (2000) An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. Psychophysiology 37: 464-472.
29. Smid H, Mulder G, Mulder LJM, Brands GJ, (1992) A psychophysiological study of the use of partial information in stimulus-response translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 18: 1101-1119.