Complex motor representations may not be preserved after complete spinal cord injury

Experimental Neurology

Volumn 236, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 46-49

  Olsson, C J ^a,b  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

FMRI; Motor imagery; Motor representations; Spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT; ADULT; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROIMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINAL CORD INJURY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; PARAPLEGIA; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 84861684322     PISSN: 00144886     EISSN: 10902430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.03.022     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alkadhi H., Brugger P., Boendermaker S.H., Crelier G., Curt A., Hepp-Reymond M.-C., Kollias S.S. What disconnection tells about motor imagery: evidence from paraplegic patients. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15(2):131-140.
2. Cabeza R., Nyberg L. Imaging cognition II: an empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000, 12(1):1-47.
3. Coull J.T., Nobre A.C. Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18(18):7426-7435.
4. de Lange F.P., Hagoort P., Toni I. Neural topography and content of movement representations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17(1):97-112.
5. Desmurget M., Sirigu Angela A parietal-premotor network for movement intention and motor awareness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13(10):411-419.
6. Egner T., Monti J.M.P., Trittschuh E.H., Wieneke C.A., Hirsch J., Mesulam M.-M. Neural integration of top-down spatial and feature-based information in visual search. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28(24):6141-6151.
7. Fogassi L., Ferrari P.F., Gesierich B., Rozzi S., Chersi F., Rizzolatti G. Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science 2005, 308(5722):662-667.
8. Halsband U., Lange R.K. Motor learning in man: a review of functional and clinical studies. J. Physiol. (Paris) 2006, 99(4-6):414-424.
9. Heinze H.J., Mangun G.R., Burchert W., Hinrichs H., Scholz M., Münte T.F., Gös A., et al. Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans. Nature 1994, 372:543-546.
10. Holmes P.S., Collins D.J. The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: a functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2001, 13(1):60-83.
11. Hotz-Boendermaker S., Funk M., Summers P., Brugger P., Hepp-Reymond M.C., Curt A., Kollias S.S. Preservation of motor programs in paraplegics as demonstrated by attempted and imagined foot movements. NeuroImage 2008, 39(1):383-394.
12. Jackson P.L., Lafleur M.F., Malouin F., Richards C., Doyon J. Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2001, 82:1133-1141.
13. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage 2001, 14(1):S103-S109.
14. Johnson S.H. Imagining the impossible: intact motor representations in hemiplegics. Neuroreport 2000, 11(4):729-732.
15. Johnson-Frey S.H. Stimulation through simulation? Motor imagery and functional reorganization in hemiplegic stroke patients. Brain Cogn. 2004, 55(2):328-331.
16. Jurkiewicz M.T., Mikulis D.J., McIlroy W.E., Fehlings M.G., Verrier M.C. Sensorimotor cortical plasticity during recovery following spinal cord injury: a longitudinal fMRI study. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2007, 21(6):527-538.
17. Kennerley S.W., Sakai K., Rushworth M.F.S. Organization of action sequences and the role of the pre-SMA. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 91(2):978-993.
18. Malouin F., Richards C.L., Jackson P.L., Dumas F., Doyon J. Brain activations during motor imagery of locomotor-related tasks: a PET study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2003, 19:47-62.
19. Meister I., Krings T., Foltys H., Boroojerdi B., Müller M., Töpper R., Thron A. Effects of long-term practice and task complexity in musicians and nonmusicians performing simple and complex motor tasks: implications for cortical motor organization. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2005, 25(3):345-352.
20. Olsson C.-J., Nyberg L. Motor imagery: if you can't do it, you won't think it. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2010, 20(5):711-715.
21. Olsson C.-J., Nyberg L. Brain simulation of action may be grounded in physical experience. Neurocase 2011, 17(6):501-505.
22. Olsson C.-J., Jonsson B., Larsson A., Nyberg L. Motor representations and practice affect brain systems underlying imagery: an fMRI study of internal imagery in novices and active high jumpers. Open Neuroimaging 2008, 2:5-13.
23. Owen A.M., Coleman M.R., Boly M., Davis M.H., Laureys S., Pickard J.D. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 2006, 313(5792):1402.
24. Picard N., Strick P.L. Activation of the supplementary motor area (SMA) during performance of visually guided movements. Cereb. Cortex 2003, 13(9):977-986.
25. Ranganath C., Johnson M.K., D'Esposito M. Prefrontal activity associated with working memory and episodic long-term memory. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(3):378-389.
26. Snyder L.H., Batista A.P., Andersen R.A. Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature 1997, 386:167-170.
27. Talairach J., Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain 1988, Thieme, New York, NY.