Differences in the ability of spermatozoa from individual boar ejaculates to withstand different semen-processing techniques

Animal Reproduction Science

Volumn 132, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 66-73

  Parrilla, Inma ^a   del Olmo, David ^a   Sijses, Laurien ^a   Martinez Alborcia, María J ^a   Cuello, Cristina ^a   Vazquez, Juan M ^a   Martinez, Emilio A ^a   Roca, Jordi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cryopreservation; Liquid storage; Pig; Semen; Sex sorting

Indexed keywords

MALONALDEHYDE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SURVIVAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DNA FRAGMENTATION; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPERM PRESERVATION; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; SWINE;

ANIMALS; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SURVIVAL; CRYOPRESERVATION; DNA FRAGMENTATION; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; MALE; MALONDIALDEHYDE; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA; SWINE;

SUIDAE; SUS;

EID: 84861673767     PISSN: 03784320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agarwal A., Makker K., Sharma R. Clinical relevance of oxidative stress in male factor infertility: an update. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2008, 59:2-11.
2. Awda B.J., Mackenzie-Bell M., Buhr M.M. Reactive oxygen species and boar sperm function. Biol. Reprod. 2009, 81:553-561.
3. Boe-Hansen G.B., Christensen P., Vibjerg D., Nielsen M.B., Hedeboe A.M. Sperm chromatin structure integrity in liquid stored boar semen and its relationships with field fertility. Theriogenology 2008, 69:728-736.
4. Boe-Hansen G.B., Morris I.D., Ersbøll A.K., Greve T., Christensen P. DNA integrity in sexed bull sperm assessed by neutral Comet assay and sperm chromatin structure assay. Theriogenology 2005, 63:1789-1802.
5. Caballero, I., Parrilla, I., Almiñana, C., del Olmo, D., Roca, J., Martínez, E.A., Vázquez, J.M. Seminal plasma proteins as modulators of the sperm function and their application in sperm biotechnologies. Reprod. Domest. Anim., in press. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02028.x.
6. Cremades T., Roca J., Rodriguez-Martinez H., Abaigar T., Vazquez J.M., Martinez E.A. Kinematic changes during the cryopreservation of boar spermatozoa. J. Androl. 2005, 26:610-618.
7. De Ambrogi M., Spinaci M., Galeati G., Tamanini C. Viability and DNA fragmentation in differently sorted boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2006, 66:1994-2000.
8. Didion B.A., Kasperson K.M., Wixon R.L., Evenson D.P. Boar fertility and sperm chromatin structure status: a retrospective report. J. Androl. 2009, 30:655-660.
9. Enciso M., Muriel L., Fernández J.L., Goyanes V., Segrelles E., Marcos M., Montejo J.M., Ardoy M., Pacheco A., Gosálvez J. Infertile men with varicocele show a high relative proportion of sperm cells with intense nuclear damage level, evidenced by the sperm chromatin dispersion test. J. Androl. 2006, 27:106-111.
10. Flowers W.L. Selection for boar fertility and semen quality-the way ahead. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 2009, 66:67-78.
11. Garner D.L. Flow cytometric sexing of mammalian sperm. Theriogenology 2006, 65:943-957.
12. Garner D.L. Sex-sorting mammalian sperm: concept to application in animals. J. Androl. 2001, 22:519-526.
13. Gosálvez J., Ramirez M.A., López-Fernández C., Crespo F., Evans K.M., Kjelland M.E., Moreno J.F. Sex-sorted bovine spermatozoa and DNA damage: II. Dynamic features. Theriogenology 2011, 75:206-211.
14. Hernandez M., Roca J., Calvete J.J., Sanz L., Muiño-Blanco T., Cebrian-Perez J.A., Vazquez J.M., Martinez E.A. Cryo-survival and in vitro fertilizing capacity post-thaw is improved when boar spermatozoa are frozen in the presence of seminal plasma from good freezer boars. J. Androl. 2007, 28:689-697.
15. Hernandez M., Roca J., Gil M.A., Vazquez J.M., Martinez E.A. Adjustments on the cryopreservation conditions reduce the incidence of boar ejaculates with poor sperm freezability. Theriogenology 2007, 67:1436-1445.
16. Holt W.V., Medrano A., Thurston L.M., Watson P.F. The significance of cooling rates and animal variability for boar sperm cryopreservation: insights from the cryomicroscope. Theriogenology 2005, 63:370-382.
17. Johnson L.A., Weitze K.F., Fiser P., Maxwell W.M. Storage of boar semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 62:143-172.
18. Johnson L.A., Flook J.P., Hawk H.W. Sex preselection in rabbits: live births from X and Y sperm separated by DNA and cell sorting. Biol. Reprod. 1989, 41:199-203.
19. Kommisrud E., Paulenz H., Sehested E., Grevle I.S. Influence of boar and semen parameters on motility and acrosome integrity in liquid boar semen stored for five days. Acta Vet. Scand. 2002, 43:49-55.
20. Leahy T., Gadella B.M. Sperm surface changes and physiological consequences induced by sperm handling and storage. Reproduction 2011, 142:759-778.
21. Lewis S.E., Agbaje I., Alvarez J. Sperm DNA tests as useful adjuncts to semen analysis. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 2008, 54:111-125.
22. Makker K., Agarwal A., Sharma R. Oxidative stress & male infertility. Indian J. Med. Res. 2009, 129:357-367.
23. Parrilla I., Vazquez J.M., Gil M.A., Caballero I., Almiñana C., Roca J., Martinez E.A. Influence of storage time on functional capacity of flow cytometrically sex-sorted boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2005, 64:86-98.
24. Radomil L., Pettitt M.J., Merkies K.M., Hickey K.D., Buhr M.M. Stress and dietary factors modify boar sperm for processing. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2011, 46(2):39-44.
25. Rath D., Bathgate R., Rodriguez-Martinez H., Roca J., Strzezek J., Waberski D. Recent advances in boar semen cryopreservation. Control of Pig Reproduction VIII 2009, 51-66. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham. H. Rodriguez-Martinez, J.L. Vallet, A.J. Ziecic (Eds.).
26. Rath D., Johnson L.A. Application and commercialization of flow cytometrically sex-sorted semen. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2008, 43(2):338-346.
27. Robinson J.A., Buhr M.M. Impact of genetic selection on management of boar replacement. Theriogenology 2005, 63:668-678.
28. Roca J., Hernandez M., Carvajal G., Vazquez J.M., Martinez E.A. Factors influencing boar sperm cryosurvival. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84:2692-2699.
29. Roca J., Parrilla I., Rodriguez-Martinez H., Gil M.A., Cuello C., Vazquez J.M., Martinez E.A. Approaches towards efficient use of boar semen in the pig industry. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2011, 46(2):79-83.
30. Roca J., Vazquez J.M., Gil M.A., Cuello C., Parrilla I., Martínez E.A. Challenges in pig artificial insemination. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2006, 41(2):43-53.
31. Thurston L.M., Watson P.F., Holt W.V. Semen cryopreservation: a genetic explanation for species and individual variation?. Cryo Lett. 2002, 23:255-262.
32. Vallorani C., Spinaci M., Bucci D., Tamanini C., Galeati G. Effects of antioxidants on boar spermatozoa during sorting and storage. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2010, 122:58-65.
33. Waberski D., Schapmann E., Henning H., Riesenbeck A., Brandt H. Sperm chromatin structural integrity in normospermic boars is not related to semen storage and fertility after routine AI. Theriogenology 2011, 75:337-345.
34. Waterhouse K.E., Hofmo P.O., Tverdal A., Miller R.R. Within and between breed differences in freezing tolerance and plasma membrane fatty acid composition of boar sperm. Reproduction 2006, 131:887-894.