Visitor management policy of national parks, national wildlife areas and refuges in canada and the united states: A policy analysis of public documents

Leisure/ Loisir

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 475-499

  Hyslop, Kristine E ^a   Eagles, Paul F J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

National parks; Park agency; Policy analysis; Protected areas; Public; Tourism; Visitor management; Wildlife areas

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861644052     PISSN: 14927713     EISSN: 21512221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14927713.2007.9651392     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. American Customer Satisfaction Index. 2001. Report on U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, Washington, DC:Author.
2. Bergerson, T., 2000. The NPS Visitor Survey Card:First year survey and implications for park management. Park Science, 20(1):1–4.
3. Brown, K., and Carpenter, T., 2002. National Wildlife Refuge Visitor Satisfaction Survey—Data Analysis and Report, Washington, DC:U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
4. Canadian Nature Federation. 2002. Conserving Wildlife on a Shoestring Budget—Opportunities and Challenges for Canada's National Wildlife Areas, Migratory Bird Sanctuaries and Marine Wildlife Areas, Ottawa:Author.
5. Canadian Wildlife Service. 2000. Strategic Plan 2000, Ottawa:Author.
6. Caudill, J., and Henderson, E., 2005. Banking on Nature 2004:The Economic Benefits to Local Communities of National Wildlife Refuge Visitation, Washington:U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Division of Economics. Retrieved October 19, 2005, from http://library.fws.gov/Refuges/ BankingOnNature_2004_final.htm
7. Hornback, K.E., and Eagles, P.F.J., 1999. Guidelines for Public Use Measurement and Reporting at Parks and Protected Areas, Gland, Switzerland:World Commission on Protected Areas.
8. Eagles, P., McCool, S., and Haynes, C., 2002. Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas—Guidelines for Planning and Management, Gland, Switzerland:IUCN.
9. Golding, D., and Tuler, S., 2002. A Comprehensive Study of Visitor Safety in the National Park System:Final Report, Worcester, MA:Clark University.
10. Hagen, K., Ostergren, D., and Solop, F., 2003. Ethnic and Racial Diversity of National Park System Visitors and Non-Visitors—Technical Report, Flagstaff, AZ:Northern Arizona University.
11. IUCN. June 14–15 2004. Report from World Protected Areas Leadership Forum June 14–15, Savonlinna, Finland 2004. Retrieved February 15, 2005, from http://www.iucn.org/themes/wcpa/wcpa/WPALF_Doc/wpalffinal.pdf
12. National Park Service. 2001. Management Policies 2001, Washington, DC:Author.
13. National Park Service. 2002. National Park 2002 Visitor Use Summary Retrieved February 1, 2005, from http://www2.nature.nps.gov/stats/ summary2002.pdf
14. National Park Service. 2003a. Acreage Summary Statistics, Washington, DC:Land Resources Division. Retrieved January 26, 2005, from http:// www2.nature.nps.gov/stats/acresum03cy.pdf
15. National Park Service. 2003b. Statistical Abstract 2003, Washington, DC:Author.
16. National Park Service. 2004a. Doing Business with the National Park Service Retrieved February 1, 2005, from http://www.nps.gov/legacy/ business.html. Updated February 26, 2004
17. National Park Service. February 1 2004b. National Park System February 1, 2005, from http://www.nps.gov/pub_aff/refdesk/classlst.pdf
18. National Park Service. October 18 2005a. Fiscal Year 2006 Budget Justifications:Park Management-Visitor Services October 18, 2005, from http://data2.itc.nps.gov/budgetweb/fy2006/ONPS_VS.pdf
19. National Park Service. 2005b. Serving the Visitor 2004, Moscow, ID:Inst-Prints.
20. Parks Canada. 2001. Guide to Management Planning, Gatineau, QC:Author. Available on microlog.
21. Parks Canada. 2002. The Parks Canada Charter, Gatineau, QC:Author.
22. Canada, Parks. January 12 2003a. Guiding Principles and Operational Policies January 12, 2005, from http://www.pc.gc.ca/docs/pc/poli/princip/index _E.asp. Updated October 14, 2003
23. Parks Canada. 2003b. State of Protected Heritage Areas 2001 Report, Gatineau, QC:Author.
24. Parks Canada. 2004a. 2004–2005 Estimates:A Report on Plans and Priorities, Gatineau, QC:Author.
25. Parks Canada. 2004b. Parks Canada Agency Annual Report 2003–2004, Gatineau, QC:Author.
26. Parks Canada. 2005. State of Protected Heritage Areas 2003 Report, Gatineau, QC:Author. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.pc.gc.ca/ docs/pc/rpts/etat-state-2003/index_E.asp
27. Payne, R.J., and Nilsen, P.W., 2002. “ Visitor Planning and Management ”. In Parks and Protected in Canada:Planning and Management, 2nd ed., Edited by:Dear-den, P., and Rollins, R., 148–178. Toronto:Oxford University Press.
28. Thomas, L., 1998. Economic Values of Protected Areas:Guidelines for Protected Area Managers, Gland, Switzerland:World Commission on Protected Areas.
29. U.S. Department of the Interior. 2001. 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation, Washington, DC:Author.
30. U.S. Department of the Interior. 2002. FY 2002 Annual Performance Plan; FY 2000 Annual Performance Report—Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC:Author.
31. U.S. Department of the Interior. February 23 2005a. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service—Fiscal Year 2005 Budget Justifications February 23, 2005, from http://budget.fws.gov/2005/fy%202005%20GB/toc.html
32. U.S. Department of the Interior. 2005b. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service—Fiscal Year 2006 Budget Justifications Retrieved October 18, 2005, from http://www.fws.gov/budget/2006/fy%202006%20GB/toc.html
33. U.S. Department of the Interior. 2005c. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service—Visitor Satisfaction Survey Retrieved October 24, 2005 from http://www.fws.gov/refuges/generallnterest/vss.html
34. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. February 22 2005a. America's National Wildlife Refuge System February 22, 2005, from http://refuges.fws.gov/. Updated February 11, 2005
35. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005b. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service—Visitors Hugely Satisfied with Refuge System. Refuge Update, 2(2)