Towards a data quality management framework for digital soil mapping with limited data

Digital Soil Mapping with Limited Data

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 137-149

  Krol, B G C M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861626705     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8592-5_11     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Bishop, T. F. A., McBratney, A. B., Whelan, B. M., 2001. Measuring the quality of digital soil maps using information criteria. Geoderma 103, 95-111.
2. Bishop, T. F. A., Minasny, B., 2006. Digital soil-terrain modelling: the predictive potential and uncertainty. In: S. Grunwald (Ed.), Environmental Soil-Landscape Modeling: Geographic Information Technologies and Pedometrics. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
3. Bishop, T. F. A., Minasny, B., McBratney, A. B., 2006. Uncertainty analysis for soil-terrain models. International Journal of Geographical Information Sciences 20, 117-134.
4. Bui, E. N., Moran, C. J., 2003. A strategy to fill gaps in soil survey over large spatial extents: an example from the Murray-Darling basin of Australia. Geoderma, 111(1-2), 21-44.
5. Chapman, A. D., 2005. Principles of Data Quality, version 1.0. Report for the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Copenhagen.
6. Chrisman, N. R., 1984. The role of quality information in the long-term functioning of a geographic information system. Cartographica, 21, 79-87.
7. Dalcin, E. C., 2004. Data Quality Concepts and Techniques Applied to Taxonomic Databases. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton.
8. Davis, J. C., 2002. Statistics and data analysis in geology, third edition. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
9. Devillers, R., Gervais, M., Bedard, Y., Jeansoulin, R., 2002. Spatial data quality: from metadata to quality indicators and contextual end-user manual, OEEPE/ISPRS Joint Workshop on Spatial Data Quality Management, 21-22 March 2002, Istanbul.
10. EPA, 2001. EPA Requirements for quality assurance project plans, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
11. EPA, 2003. Guidance for geospatial data quality assurance project plans, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
12. Finke, P. A., 2007. Quality assessment of digital soil maps: producers and users perspectives. In: P. Lagacherie, A. B. McBratney, M. Voltz, (Eds.), Digital Soil Mapping: An Introductory Perspective. Developments in Soil Science, Vol. 31. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
13. Forbes, T., Rossiter, D., Van Wambeke, A., 1982. Guidelines for evaluating the adequacy of soil resource inventories, 1987th edition. SMSS Technical Monograph No. 4. Cornell University, Department of Agronomy, Ithaca, NY.
14. Godfrey, S., Howard, G., 2004. Water Safety Plans (WSP) for urban piped water supplies in developing countries. Water, Engineering and Development Centre, Loughborough University, Leicesterhsire, UK.
15. Grunwald, S., Bruland, G. L., Goovaerts, P., Bloom, S. A., 2005. Independent validation of soil predictions - the act of testing the truth. Abstract book, Pedometrics 2005 meeting, 12-14 September 2005, Naples, FL., USA.
16. Grunwald, S., 2006. What do we really know about the space-time continuum of soil-landscapes. In: S. Grunwald (Ed.), Environmental Soil-Landscape Modeling: Geographic Information Technologies and Pedometrics. CRC Press, New York.
17. Hengl, T., Husnjak, S., 2006. Evaluating adequacy and usability of soil maps in Croatia. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70, 920-929.
18. Hunter, G. J., Jones, S. D., Bregt, A., Masters, E. G., 2003. Spatial data quality. In: C. M. Bauzer Medeiros (Ed.), Advanced Geographic Information Systems. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Oxford, UK.
19. ISO, 2000. Quality Management Systems - Fundamentals and Vocabulary (ISO 9000:2000), International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
20. ISO, 2002. Geographic Information - Quality Principles; first edition (ISO 19113:2002), International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
21. Jones, B. E., 1999. Principles and practices for quality assurance and quality control. US Geological Service Open File Report 98-636. http//ma.water.usgs.gov/fhwa/products/ofr98-636.pdf.
22. Kahn, B. K., Strong, D. M., Wang, R. Y., 2002. Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance. Communications of the ACM 45, 184-192.
23. Kerr, K., 2006. The institutionalisation of data quality in the New Zealand health sector. PhD thesis. University of Auckland, New Zealand.
24. Krol, B., Rossiter, D. G., Siderius, W., 2007. Ontology-based multi-source data integration for digital soil mapping. In: P. Lagacherie, A. B. McBratney, M. Voltz (Eds.), Digital Soil Mapping: An Introductory Perspective. Developments in Soil Science, Vol. 31. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 119-133.
25. Lagacherie, P., Legros, J. P., Burrough, P. A., 1995. A soil survey procedure using the knowledge of soil pattern established on a previously mapped reference area. Geoderma, 65(3-4), 283-301.
26. Lagacherie, P., McBratney, A. B., 2007. Spatial soil information systems and spatial soil inference systems: perspectives for digital soil mapping. In: P. Lagacherie, A. B. McBratney, M. Voltz (Eds.), Digital Soil Mapping: An Introductory Perspective. Developments in Soil Science, Vol. 31. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
27. McBratney, A. B., Mendonça Santos, M. L., Minasny, B., 2003. On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117, 3-52.
28. Moran, C. J., Bui, E. N., 2002. Spatial data mining for enhanced soil map modelling. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16, 533-550.
29. Schmidley, R. W., 1997. Quality control in mapping: some fundamental concepts. Surveying and Land Information Systems 57, 31-36.
30. Strong, D. M., Lee, Y. W., Wang, R. Y., 1997. Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM 40, 103-110.
31. Wand, Y., Wang, R. Y., 1996. Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Communications of the ACM 39, 86-95.
32. Wang, R. Y., Strong, D. M., 1996. Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems 12(4), 5-34.
33. Wang, R. Y., 1998. A product perspective on total data quality management. Communications of the ACM 41, 58-65.
34. Webster, R., Oliver, M., 2001. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.
35. Zhang, J., Goodchild, M., 2002. Uncertainty in Geographical Information. Research Monographs in Geographic Information Systems. Taylor and Francis, London.