Whom to talk to? A stakeholder perspective on business process development

Universal Access in the Information Society

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 125-150

  Fleischmann, Albert ^a   Stary, Christian ^b  

^a Metasonic ^*  (Germany)

^b JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Agile business development; Business process execution; Business process modelling; Organization design; Process prototyping; Representation; Subject orientation

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT; BUSINESS PROCESS EXECUTION; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELLING; ORGANIZATION DESIGN; REPRESENTATION;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SPECIFICATIONS;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 84861612586     PISSN: 16155289     EISSN: 16155297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10209-011-0236-x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Acosta, A., Leon, Y. J., Conrad, C. R., Malave, C. O.: Global Engineering: Design, Decision Making and Communication. CRC Press, London (2009).
2. Agarwal, A., Amend, M., Das, M., Ford, M., Keller, C., Kloppmann, M., König, D., Leymann, F., Müller, R., Pfau, G., Plösser, K., Rangaswamy, R., Rickayzen, A., Rowley, M., Schmidt, P., Trickovic, I., Yiu, A., Zeller, M: WS-BPEL Extension for People-BPEL4People, Version 1. 0, June 2007.
3. Bach, V.: Role specific portal design (in German) duv, Wiesbaden (2006).
4. Bandara, W., Gable, G. G., Rosemann, M.: Factors and measures of business process models: model building through a multiple case study. Eur J Inf Syst 14, 347-360 (2005).
5. Brown, J., Duguid, P.: Organizing knowledge. Reflections 1(2). Society of Organizational Learning (1999a).
6. Brown, J., Duguid, P.: The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1999).
7. Chakraborthy, D.: Extending the reach of business processes. IEEE Comput 37(4), 78-80 (2004).
8. De Marco, T.: Structured Analysis and Systems Specification. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1978).
9. Denert, E.: Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin (1991).
10. Eapen, G.: Flexible Companies for the Uncertain World. CRC Press, London (2009).
11. Ehrig, M.: Ontology Alignment. Bridging the Semantic Gap. Springer, Berlin (2007).
12. Fleischmann, A., Chin, S. T., Effelsberg, W.: Specification and implementation of an ISO session layer. IBM Syst J 25(3), 255-275 (1987).
13. Fleischmann, A.: Distributed systems-software design and implementation. Springer, Berlin (1994).
14. Fleischmann, A.: Subjektorientiertes Geschäftsprozessmanagement, White Paper@ www. jcom1. com: jCOM1 AG, Rohrbach (2007).
15. Fleischmann, A., Lippe, S., Meyer, N., Stary, C.: Coherent task modelling and execution based on subject-oriented representations. In: Proceedings TAMODIA'09, Task Modelling and Diagrams for User Interface Design. Brussels, Springer, September 2009.
16. González, A., España, S., Pastor, O.: Towards a communicational perspective for enterprise information systems modelling. In: The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 15, Part 2, pp. 62-76 (2009).
17. Groff, T. R., Jones, T. P.: Introduction to Knowledge Management: Knowledge Management in Business. Butterworth/Heinemann, Amsterdam (2003).
18. Haeckel, S. S.: Adaptive Enterprise: Creating and Leading Sense-AND-Respond Organizations. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA (1999).
19. Harel, D., Rumpe, B.: Meaningful modelling: what's the semantics of "semantics"? IEEE Comput. 37(10), 64-72 (2004).
20. Havey, M.: Essential Business Process Modelling. O′Reilly, New York (2005).
21. Heftberger, S., Stary, C.: Partizipatives Organisationales Lernen-Ein Prozessorientierter Ansatz. DUV, Wiesbaden (2004).
22. Herrmann, T., Hoffmann, M., Kunau, G., Loser, K. U.: A modelling method for the development of groupware applications as socio-technical systems. Behav. Inf. Technol. 23(2), 119-135 (2004).
23. Herrmann, T.: SeeMe in a nutshell-the semi-structured, socio-technical modeling method. http://www. imtm-iaw. rub. de/imperia/md/content/seeme/seeme_in_a_nutshell. pdf (2006).
24. Hoare, C.: Communicating sequential processes, CACM (1978).
25. Hoare, C.: Communicating sequential processes, Prentice Hall (1984).
26. Holmes, T., Vasko, M., Dustdar, S.: VieBOP: extending BPEL engines with BPEL4People. Parallel, distributed and networked-based processing. In: Proceedings of the 16th Euromicro Conference on PDP, pp. 547-555 (2008).
27. Kloppmann, M., Koenig, D., Leymann, F., Pfau, G., Rickayzen, A., von Riegen, C., Schmidt, P., Trickovic, I.: WS-BPEL extension for people-BPEL4People, A Joint White Paper by IBM and SAP, July 2005.
28. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jorgensen, H.: Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15, 91-102 (2006).
29. Lankhorst, M., et al.: Enterprise Architecture at Work. Modelling, Communication, and Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2005).
30. Lewis, M., Young, B., Mathiassen, L., Rai, A., Welke, R.: Business process innovation based on stakeholder perceptions. Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag. 6, 7-17 (2007).
31. Lohr, J., Deppe, A.: Der CMS-Guide. Content-Management-Systeme: Erfolgsfaktoren, Geschäftsmodelle, Produktübersicht. Vieweg, Wiesbaden (2001).
32. Milner, R.: Calculus of Communicating Systems. Springer, Berlin (1980).
33. Neubauer, M.; Oppl, S.; Stary, C.: Towards intuitive modelling of business processes: prospects for flow- and natural language-orientation. In: Proceedings TAMODIA'09, Task Modelling and Diagrams for User Interface Design. Brussels, Springer, September 2009.
34. Pinker, St.: The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. Allen Lane, London (2007).
35. Rittgen, G.: A language-mapping approach to action-oriented development of information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15, 70-81 (2006).
36. Rouse, W. B. (ed.): Enterprise transformation: understanding and enabling fundamental change. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2006).
37. Rumpfhuber, M.; Fichtenbauer, C.; Stary, C.: Sprachgerechte unternehmensnahe Modellierung von ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten-Zur adäquaten Aus- und Weiterbildung von ModelliererInnen. In: Proceedings EPK-2002, Workshop 'Ereignisgesteuerte Prozessketten', GI, Springer Lecture Notes, pp. 109-118 (2002).
38. Sarini, M., Simone, C.: Recursive articulation work in Ariadne: the alignment of meanings. In: Proceedings of COOP 2002, pp. 191-206 (2002).
39. Scheer, A.-W.: ARIS-Modellierungsmethoden, Metamodelle, Anwendungen, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin (2001).
40. Schmidt J. E., Rabanus S., Vilmos A.: Syntax http://www. web. uni-marburg. de/dsa//Direktor/Rabanus/SS2005/Grundlagen. pdf (2005).
41. Schmidt, W., Fleischmann, A., Gilbert, O.: Subjektorientiertes Geschäftsprozessmanagement. In: HMD-Handbuch der Wirtschaftsinformatik (2009).
42. Scholz, M., Holl, A.: Objektorientierung und Poppers Drei-Welten-Modell als Theoriekerne der Wirtschaftsinformatik. In: Schütte, R. et al. (eds.) Universität Essen, Essen (1999).
43. Smith, H., Fingar, P.: Business Process Management: The Third Wave. Meghan-Kiffer, Tampa (2003).
44. Stary, C.: TADEUS: seamless development of task-based and user-oriented interfaces. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A 30(5): 509-525 (2000).
45. Stephenson, S. V., Sage, A.: Architecting for enterprise resource planning. Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag. 6, 81-121 (2007).
46. Strosnider, J. K., Nandi, P., Kumaran, S., Ghosh, S., Arsanjani, A.: Model-driven synthesis of SOA solutions. IBM Syst. J 41(5), 415-432 (2008).
47. UN/CEFACT: UN/CEFACT core components technical specification, version 3. 0. http://75. 43. 29. 149: 8080/download/attachements/3801818/Specification_CCTS3p0+2nd+Public+Review+16APR2007. pdf?version=1 (2007).
48. Vernadat, F. B.: Enterprise Modelling and Integration: Principles and Application. Chapman and Hall, London (1996).
49. Vogel, T., Schmidt, A., Lemm, A., Österle, H.: Service and document based interoperability for European eCustoms solutions. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Comm. Res. 3(3), 31-37 (2008).
50. Weick, K. E.: The Social Psychology of Organizations. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA (1999).
51. Wieden, W.: Corporate linguistics: a knowledge management approach to language. AAA-Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 31(2), 185-207 (2006).
52. Winograd, T.: A language/action perspective on the design of collaborative work. In: Greif, I. (ed.) Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. A Book of Readings, pp. 623-653. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA (1988).
53. Wood, L. E. (ed.): User Interface Design: Bridging the Gap from User Requirements to Design. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1998).
54. Yankee Group: The Yankee group report: interoperability emerges as new core competency for enterprise architects. http://www. intersystems. com/ensemble/analysts/yankee. pdf (2008).